1 / 14

Search for Bottom Counterparts of X(3872) and Y(4260) via p + p - 

Search for Bottom Counterparts of X(3872) and Y(4260) via p + p - . July 28, 2006, ICHEP ’ 06 @ Moscow. Outline. I Introduction II X b  p + p -  at Tevatron/LHC III Y b  p + p -  in e + e -  ( g ISR ) Y b IV Discussion and Conclusion. based on hep-ph/0606016

didier
Télécharger la présentation

Search for Bottom Counterparts of X(3872) and Y(4260) via p + p - 

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Search for Bottom Counterparts of X(3872) and Y(4260) via p+p- July 28, 2006, ICHEP’06 @ Moscow

  2. Outline I Introduction II Xbp+p- at Tevatron/LHC III Ybp+p- in e+e- (gISR)Yb IV Discussion and Conclusion based on hep-ph/0606016 (published in PRD) A simple talk to motivate the experts

  3. I. Introduction Bottomonium? [X(3940), Z(3940)] Xb, Ybp+p-  p+p-J/y  p+p-J/y  wJ/y

  4. Narrow 1++ preferred DD* threshold

  5. ISR The Y(4260) 1-- 2005 2006 G ~ 90 MeV Gee Bp+p-J/y ~ 5.5 eV Direct Scan vs 0.5 eV y(3770) LargeG(Y p+p-y) !

  6. II. Xbp+p- at Tevatron/LHC Mass: If BB* ➯ 10640 MeV If coupled BB* and s/d-wave ➯ ~10560 MeV Production: - No B  KX analogue - Fortunately prompt X(3872) dominant (~ y(2S)) Will check if rdominant when seen 4.4K/77pb-1 vs300K/40pb-1 J/y ~ 3000 X(3872) evts / fb-1 [ p+p-J/y(mm)] PRL’02 PRD’05 Xbp+p-(mm) analogue: ~ 180 evts / 8fb-1 Too Optimistic?

  7. To Do (seems on-going at CDF) - benchmark: (2S) p+p- - Look for high mass, narrow states   bb ??? Promising at Tevatron Run II More conservative: Take ratio of peaks ~ 1/800 ➯ ~ 30 evts / 8fb-1 J/y(mm) N.B. BR, production frac., etc. CDF, PRD’05 (mm) CDF, PRL’02

  8. Remarks - Much work to do to estimate cross sections - Forward cross sections even less known Should be larger ! - LHCb has forward design(w/ RICH/ECAL) ➯Spectroscopy May be best @ LHCb “Y(3940)” Any narrow state, e.g. wJ/y (K+K-J/y ?) Assured at LHC (if exist) Xbp+p-(mm) Domenech-Garret, Sanchis-Lozano, NPB’01 Huge cross section over 102 increase ➯ Expect > 103 evts / fb-1 PYTHIA fitting CDF J/y To Do for ATLAS, CMS, LHCb - benchmark: (2S) p+p- - Look for high mass, narrow states CDF, PRL’02   bb ???

  9. II. Ybp+p-in e+e- (gISR)Yb e+e- gISRp+p-J/y e+e- p+p-J/y BaBar, PRL’05 CLEO-c, PRL’06 233 fb-1 13 pb-1 ~ 125 evts ~ 35 evts stimulate s(e+e-+p-J/) ~ 50 pb Analogy: Do bothe+e- gISRp+p- and e+e- p+p-

  10. Belle (5S) Runs Bs motivated June 21-23, 2005 1.86 fb-1 @ 10869 MeV Energy scan: 10825 10845 10865 10885 10905 each 30 pb-1 Repeated June, 2006 21.7 fb-1 ! ~ 1 fb-1/day Do Bothe+e- p+p- and e+e- gISR p+p- ~ 24 fb-1 on (5S)at hand Direct ScanQuick and Easy Yb Mass ? Cross Section ?

  11. Guestimates ─ Mass: Use QQg hybrid (CLEO favored) lattice work to illustrate - 10600 - 10900 MeV(Michael) Could scale down, ∵ccg prediction typically higher than Y(4260) ➯ Could show up in ISR on (5S) - 10900 – 11000 MeV (Juge, Kuti, Morningstar) Predicted ccg state ~ 4260 ➯ Prefers Higher Energy Scan Width: 100 MeV (~ Yc = Y(4260)) plausible Product BR: Assume ~ Could be smaller or larger ─ 10865 ─ BaBar/CLEO

  12. Yb p+p- Evt Guestimates Cross Section: ISR on (5S) g energy fraction in CM Direct 10900 11000 ─ ─ ~1/s scaling Even for ~ 1 eV, Comparable to BaBar CLEO-c for Y(4260) ~ 125 ISR evts @ 10700 MeV, for 25 fb-1 on (5S) ~ 45 Direct Scan evts / 30 pb-1 Promising ! More effective ?

  13. IV. Discussion and Conclusion • Only Tevatron confirmed X(3872) — Need Highest Energy • - Only narrow states at hadronic colliders: Go for Xb • - Too much combinatorics (p+p-) for heavy ion collisions • 1++not easy at e+e-, so/but LHCb should • - Be prepared for other Narrow States • - Aim for diverse modes (e.g. K+K-  or w) and JPC determination • Available (5S) at Belle should be exploited for ISR Yb • Probably hard for BaBar to collect equivalent data • Both Belle and BaBar should try • Quick energy scan 10600 – 11000 MeV Profitable ! (?) • If Yb found, can run a little longer around direct e+e-  Yb • Study different channels (K+K-? p0p0?) and properties (be ingenious)

  14. Conclusion 233 fb-1 125 evts BaBar (gISR +) ppat B Factories ? ppat Tevatron/LHC ? Xb, YbMaybe Discovered in Near Future !

More Related