1 / 88

ETM5221 Engineering Teaming: Application and Execution

ETM5221 Engineering Teaming: Application and Execution. Nicholas C. Romano, Jr. Nicholas-Romano@mstm.okstate.edu Paul E. Rossler prossle@okstate.edu. Week 4 April 23, 2002 Group Dynamics . Agenda. A quick review of difficulties with groups Helping direct group dynamics

dinah
Télécharger la présentation

ETM5221 Engineering Teaming: Application and Execution

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ETM5221 Engineering Teaming: Application and Execution Nicholas C. Romano, Jr.Nicholas-Romano@mstm.okstate.eduPaul E. Rosslerprossle@okstate.edu

  2. Week 4 April 23, 2002Group Dynamics

  3. Agenda • A quick review of difficulties with groups • Helping direct group dynamics • Jelled teams and productive workplaces • The mythical man-month • Key features of the Group System Concept

  4. Meeting purposes: Almost 2/3 involve complex group processes (Monge, P. R., McSween, C., & Wyer, J. 1989)

  5. Look who’s talking • Traditional Teamwork • Boss talked 33% of time • Next person 22% • Technology Supported Teamwork • Boss talked 5 % • Next person 8% (From Romano)

  6. A quick review of difficulties with groups • Some tasks are simply not well suited for group methods or processes • Often develop preferred ways of looking at problems that can inhibit innovation • Synergistic effect can be absent • For example, brainstorming doesn’t exceed performance of individually produced and combined results

  7. Difficulties (continued) • Politics, power, and position can dominate methods or results • Or can suppress contributions of others • A group fulfills social needs, but group seldom has ways of regulating amount • Fairly reliable characteristic of groups to get off track and get stuck there

  8. Difficulties (continued) • Groups tend to have relatively low aspiration levels with respect to quality of solutions accepted • Once some level of acceptance is inferred, little further search happens • Often lack concern and method for dealing with way to best utilize and communicate members’ knowledge

  9. Difficulties (continued) • Strongly influenced by cultural norms • In natural groups, members tend to be conservative, circumspect • If the group’s efforts do not appear reinforced, effort is reduced • As group size increases, effort contributed by each individual member tends to decrease

  10. Difficulties (continued) • Reliably exhibit norms against devoting time to planning their methods • Move immediately to attacking problem, relying on implicitly shared methods • Considerable likelihood that method is poorly adapted to task and only modestly effective • Seldom have ability to change the method when things not going well

  11. Effective use of roles and process help direct dynamics • Group process management roles • Group process member roles • Task • Maintenance • Non-productive • Group process communication patterns • Team member roles

  12. An input-process-output model of teamwork Group Task Process Outcome Context Technology (Source: Doug Vogel)

  13. Artificial IntelligenceSensemaking

  14. Hi Idea Generation Idea Organization Prioritizing Policy Development Satisfaction Lo 1 1 1/2 1/2 1 - 2 Time Satisfaction as a Function of Task

  15. AI Categorizer • Analyzes semantic content • Finds and clusters like ideas • Performs as well or better • as an expert human

  16. Group process management roles • Leader • Plans agenda (including what’s offline) • Decides process • Ensures closure and continuity

  17. Group process management roles (cont’d.) • Facilitator • Uses group processes to help group • Engage in divergent thinking • Survive stress relief, catharsis stage • Formulate creative proposals • Bring agreements to closure • Ensures procedural fairness

  18. Group processmanagement roles (cont’d.) • Recorder • Assists facilitator • Captures action items and decisions • Process observer • Makes note of roles played by group members • Notes communication patterns • Comments on process quality when appropriate

  19. Task Roles Initiating Activity • Proposing solutions • Suggesting new ideas, problem definitions, approaches, or organization of material

  20. Task Roles (cont’d.) Seeking Information • Asking for clarification of suggestions, requesting additional information, or facts

  21. Task Roles (cont’d.) Seeking Opinion • Looking for an expression of feeling about something from members • Seeking clarification of values, suggestions, or ideas

  22. Task Roles (cont’d.) Giving Information • Offering facts or generalizations • Relating one's own pertinent experience to the group problem to illustrate points

  23. Task Roles (cont’d.) Giving Opinion • Stating an opinion or belief concerning the value of a suggestion or one of several suggestions

  24. Task Roles (cont’d.) Elaborating • Clarifying, giving examples or developing meanings • Trying to envision how a proposal might work if adopted

  25. Task Roles (cont’d.) Coordinating • Showing relationships among various ideas or suggestions • Attempting to draw together activities, ideas, or suggestions of various subgroups or members.

  26. Task Roles (cont’d.) Summarizing • Restating suggestions after the group has discussed them

  27. Maintenance Roles Encouraging • Being friendly, warm, responsive to others • Praising others and their ideas • Agreeing with and accepting contributions of others

  28. Maintenance Roles (cont’d.) Gatekeeping • Trying to make it possible for another member to make a contribution to the group

  29. Maintenance Roles (cont’d.) Standard Setting • Expressing standards for the group to use in choosing its content, procedures, decision making • Reminding the group to avoid decisions which conflict with group standards

  30. Maintenance Roles (cont’d.) Following • Going along with decisions of the group • Thoughtfully accepting ideas of others • Serving as audience during group discussion

  31. Maintenance Roles (cont’d.) Expressing Group Feeling • Summarizing what group feeling is sensed to be • Describing reactions of the group to ideas or solutions

  32. Combination Task and Maintenance Roles Evaluating • Submitting group decisions or accomplishments to comparison with group standards • Measuring accomplishments against goals

  33. Combination Task and Maintenance Roles (cont’d.) Diagnosing • Determining sources of difficulties, appropriate steps to take next • Analyzing the main block to progress

  34. Combination Task and Maintenance Roles (cont’d) Mediating • Harmonizing • Conciliating differences in points of view • Suggesting compromise solutions

  35. Combination Task and Maintenance Roles (cont’d) Relieving Tension • Draining of negative feelings by jesting • Putting a tense situation in wider context

  36. Combination Task and Maintenance Roles (cont’d) Testing for Consensus • Tentatively asking for group opinions in order to find out whether the group is nearing consensus on a decision • Sending up trial balloons to test group opinions • Purpose is not necessarily for decision making but rather to suggest where effort needs to be focused

  37. Managing agreeement • Endorsement – “I like it” • Endorsement with minor point of contention • Agreement with reservations – “I can live with it” • Abstain Kaner, S., Facilitator's Guide to Participatory Decision-Making. 1996, Gabriola Island, British Columbia: New Society Publishers.

  38. Managing agreement (cont’d.) • Stand aside – “I don’t like this, but I don’t want to hold up the group” • Formal disagreement but willing to go with majority • Formal disagreement with requirement to be absolved of any responsibility for implementation Kaner, S., Facilitator's Guide to Participatory Decision-Making. 1996, Gabriola Island, British Columbia: New Society Publishers.

  39. Ways to poorly manage agreement • Agree on top 20 priorities • Delegate a job to someone who is already overworked • Establish a policy that has no accountability built into it

  40. Ways to poorly manage agreement • Create a committee to do the same work over again • Make an agreement that will be vetoed by someone who is not present • Agree to “try harder” from now on

  41. We don’t vote here, we arrive • at a natural consensus

  42. Nonproductive Roles Being Aggressive • Criticizing or blaming others • Showing hostility against the group or some individual • Deflating the ego or status of others

  43. Nonproductive Roles (cont’d.) Self-Confessing • Using the group as a sounding board • Expressing personal, non group-oriented feelings or points of view

  44. Nonproductive Roles (cont’d.) Competing • Vying with others to produce the best idea, talk the most, play the most roles, gain favor with the leader

  45. Nonproductive Roles (cont’d.) Blocking • Going off on a tangent • Citing personal experiences unrelated to the problem • Arguing too much on a point • Rejecting ideas without consideration

  46. Nonproductive Roles (cont’d.) Seeking Sympathy • Trying to induce other group members to be sympathetic to one's problems or misfortunes • Deploring one's own situation • Disparaging one's own ideas to gain support

  47. Nonproductive Roles (cont’d.) Special Pleading • Introducing or supporting suggestions related to one's own pet concerns or philosophies, lobbying

  48. Nonproductive Roles (cont’d.) Horsing Around Seeking Recognition • Attempting to call attention to one's self by loud or excessive talking, extreme ideas, unusual behavior

  49. Nonproductive Roles (cont’d.) Withdrawal • Acting indifferent or passive, resorting to excessive formality, daydreaming, doodling, whispering to others, wandering from the subject

  50. Patterns of communication • Who talks? For how long? How often? • At whom do people look when they speak? a. Single-out individuals, possible potential supporters b. The group c. No one

More Related