1 / 12

Strands of Effective STEM Instruction

Strands of Effective STEM Instruction. Inquiry Based. Effective STEM Instruction. Science. Technology. Career Awareness. Thematic/ Big Idea Instruction. Co-Teaching. Standards. Math. Cooperative Learning. Carefully Timed Explicit Instruction. Engineering. STEM Education.

dobry
Télécharger la présentation

Strands of Effective STEM Instruction

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Strands of Effective STEM Instruction

  2. Inquiry Based Effective STEM Instruction Science Technology Career Awareness Thematic/ Big Idea Instruction Co-Teaching Standards Math Cooperative Learning Carefully Timed Explicit Instruction Engineering STEM Education

  3. References Inquiry Learning Amaral, O. M., Garrison, L., & Klentschy, M. (2002). Helping english learners increase achievement through inquiry-based science instruction. Bilingual Research Journal, 26(2), 213. Barrows, H. S. (1996). Problem-based learning in medicine and beyond: A brief overview; accession number: 9703301040; authors: Barrows, howard S.; subject: CURRICULUM change; subject: PROBLEM-based learning; subject: MCMASTER university (hamilton, ont.); subject: ONTARIO; subject: HAMILTON (ont.); subject: CANADA; number of pages: 9p. New Directions for Teaching & Learning, (68), 3. Cote, D., & Cote, D. (2007). Problem-based learning software for students with disabilities Dalton, B., Morocco, C. C., & Dalton, B. (1997). Supported inquiry science: Teaching for conceptual change in urban and suburban science classrooms Fradd, S. H., & Lee, O. (1999). Teachers' roles in promoting science inquiry with students from diverse language backgrounds. Educational Researcher, 28(6), 14-42. Harmer, A. J., Cates, W. M., & Harmer, A. J. (2007). Designing for learner engagement in middle school science: Technology, inquiry, and the hierarchies of engagement Hmelo-Silver, C., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to kirschner, sweller, and clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99-107. Hmelo-Silver, C., & Hmelo-Silver, C. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., Mantzicopoulos, P., Sturgeon, A., Goodwin, L., Chung, S., et al. (1998). `A place where living things affect and depend on each other': Qualitative and quantitative.. Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., Norland, J. J., Berkeley, S., McDuffie, K., Tornquist, E. H., et al. (2006). Differentiated curriculum enhancement in inclusive middle school science: Effects on classroom and high-stakes tests. Journal of Special Education, 40(3), 130-137. McCarthy, C. B., & McCarthy, C. B. (2005). Effects of thematic-based, hands-on science teaching versus a textbook approach for students with disabilities Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (1993). Reading versus doing: The relative effects of textbook-based and inquiry-oriented approaches to.. Journal of Special Education, 27(1), 1. Simons, K. D. (2007). The impact of scaffolding and student achievement levels in a problem-based learning environment Woodward, J., Carnine, D., & Gersten, R. (1988). Teaching problem solving through computer simulations. American Educational Research Journal, 25(1), 72-86.

  4. References Explicit Instruction Fradd, S. H., & Lee, O. (1999). Teachers' roles in promoting science inquiry with students from diverse language backgrounds. Educational Researcher, 28(6), 14-42. Fradd, S. H., Lee, O., Sutman, F. X., & Saxton, M. K. (2001). Promoting science literacy with english language learners through instructional materials development: A case study. Bilingual Research Journal, 25(4), 479. Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (1993). Reading versus doing: The relative effects of textbook-based and inquiry-oriented approaches to.. Journal of Special Education, 27(1), 1. Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (2000). The effectiveness of mnemonic instruction for students with learning and behavior problems: An update and research synthesis Steele, M. (2007). TEACHING SCIENCE to STUDENTS with LEARNING DIFFERENCES. Science Teacher, 74(3), 24-27. Steele, M. M., & Steele, M. M. (2008a). HELPING STUDENTS with LEARNING DISABILITIES SUCCEED Steele, M. M., & Steele, M. M. (2008b). Section 3: Science success for students with special needs Trundle, K. C., & Trundle, K. C. (2007). Chapter 7: Inquiry-based science instruction for students with disabilities Co-Teaching Bouck, E. C. (2007). Co-Teaching…Not just a textbook term: Implications for practice. Preventing School Failure, 51(2), 46-51. Cook, L., & Friend, M. (1995). Co-teaching: Guidelines for creating effective practices. (cover story). Focus on Exceptional Children, 28(3), 1. Dieker, L. A., & Murawski, W. W. (2003). Co-teaching at the secondary level: Unique issues, current trends, and suggestions for success. High School Journal, 86(4), 1. Gately, S. E., Gately Jr., F. J., & Gately, S. E. (2001). Understanding coteaching components Magiera, K., Smith, C., Zigmond, N., & Gebauer, K. (2005). Benefits of co-teaching in secondary mathematics classes. Teaching Exceptional Children, 37(3), 20-24. Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., Graetz, J., Norland, J., Gardizi, W., & McDuffie, K. (2005). Case studies in co-teaching in the content areas: Successes, failures, and challenges. Intervention in School & Clinic, 40(5), 260-270. Murawski, W. W. (2005). Introduction to special issue. Intervention in School & Clinic, 40(5), 259-259. Murawski, W. W. (2006). Student outcomes in co-taught secondary english classes: How can we improve? Murawski, W. W., & Hughes, C. E. (2009). Response to intervention, collaboration, and co-teaching: A logical combination for successful systemic change. Preventing School Failure, 53(4), 267-277. Rice, D., & Zigmond, N. (2000). Co-teaching in secondary schools: Teacher reports of developments in australian and american classrooms Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., & McDuffie, K. A. (2007). Co-teaching in inclusive classrooms: A metasynthesis of qualitative research. Exceptional Children, 73(4), 392-416. Spraker, J. Teacher teaming in relation to student performance: Findings from the literature

  5. References Cooperative Learning Abrami, P. C., Poulsen, C., & Chambers, B. (2004). Teacher motivation to implement an educational innovation: Factors differentiating users and non-users of cooperative learning. Educational Psychology, 24(2), 201-216. Amaral, O. M., Garrison, L., & Klentschy, M. (2002). Helping english learners increase achievement through inquiry-based science instruction. Bilingual Research Journal, 26(2), 213. de Romero, N. Y., Slater, P., & DeCristofano, C. (2006). Design challenges are "ELL-ementary". Science & Children, 43(4), 34-37. Devine-Wright, P., Devine-Wright, H., & Fleming, P. (2004). Situational influences upon children's beliefs about global warming and energy. Environmental Education Research, 10(4), 493-506. Dinan, F. J. (2006). Opening day: Getting started in a cooperative classroom. Journal of College Science Teaching, 35(4), 12-14. Gillies, R. M. (2008). The effects of cooperative learning on junior high school students' behaviours, discourse and learning during a science-based learning activity. School Psychology International, 29(3), 328-347. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, F. P. (2003). Joining together: Group theory and group skills (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1990). Cooperative learning and achievement. In S. Sharan (Ed.), Cooperative learning, theory and research (pp. 23-37). New York: Praeger. Johnson, D.W., & R.T. Johnson. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365. doi:DOI: 10.3102/0013189X09339057 Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., Mantzicopoulos, P., Sturgeon, A., Goodwin, L., Chung, S., et al. (1998). `A place where living things affect and depend on each other': Qualitative and quantitative.. Ross, J. A. (2007). Explanation giving and recieving in cooperative learning groups. In R. M. Gillies, A. F. Ashman & J. Terwel (Eds.), The teacher's role in implementing cooperative learning in the classroom (pp. 222-237) Springer US. Souvignier, E., & Kronenberger, J. (2007). Cooperative learning in third graders' jigsaw groups for mathematics and science with and without questioning training. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(4), 755-771. Sutman, F. X. (1993). Teaching science effectively to limited english proficient students. ERIC Clearinghouse on Urban Education, 87 Trundle, K. C., & Trundle, K. C. (2007). Chapter 7: Inquiry-based science instruction for students with disabilities Webb, N. M., Farivar, S. H., & Mastergeorge, A. M. (2002). Productive helping in cooperative groups. Theory into Practice, 41(1), 13. Webb, N. M., Nemer, K. M., & Ing, M. (2006). Small-group reflections: Parallels between teacher discourse and student behavior in peer-directed groups. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(1), 63-119. Big Idea Instruction Carnine, D. (1994). Introduction to the mini-series: Diverse learners and prevailing, emerging, and research-based.. School Psychology Review, 23(3), 341. Freund, L., & Rich, R. (2005). Teaching students with learning problems in the inclusive classroom. New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc. Steele, M. (2007). TEACHING SCIENCE to STUDENTS with LEARNING DIFFERENCES. Science Teacher, 74(3), 24-27. Steele, M. M., & Steele, M. M. (2008a). HELPING STUDENTS with LEARNING DISABILITIES SUCCEED Steele, M. M., & Steele, M. M. (2008b). Section 3: Science success for students with special needs Sutman, F. X. (1993). Teaching science effectively to limited english proficient students. ERIC Clearinghouse on Urban Education, 87

More Related