1 / 9

Chapter 1

Chapter 1. Lawyers, Legal Assistants, and the Regulation of the Legal Profession. A Legal Ethics Genealogy. 1850s Alabama Judge George Sharswood’s lectures lead to the book, Professional Ethics 1887 Alabama Bar Association Code of Ethics 1908 ABA Canons of Professional Ethics

dolan-tran
Télécharger la présentation

Chapter 1

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Chapter 1 Lawyers, Legal Assistants, and the Regulation of the Legal Profession

  2. A Legal Ethics Genealogy • 1850s Alabama Judge George Sharswood’s lectures lead to the book, Professional Ethics • 1887 Alabama Bar Association Code of Ethics • 1908 ABA Canons of Professional Ethics • 1969 ABA Model Code of Professional Responsibility • 1983 ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct • 1997 ABA Ethics 2000 Commission created • 2002 ABA House of Delegates conclude voting on the Ethics 2000 recommendations

  3. The ABA Model Code of Professional Responsibility Adopted by the ABA in 1969 Replaced the ABA Canons of Professional Ethics (1908) Has a structure of Canons, Ethical Considerations, and Disciplinary Rules The ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct Adopted by the ABA in 1983 Replaced the ABA Model Code of Professional Responsibility Has a structure of Rules and Comments Has some rules that are substantively different than the Model Code The ABA Model Code vs. The ABA Model Rules

  4. Ethics 2000 • What is It? • The name of the process designed to examine and recommend changes to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct • What was the Process? • 1997 – The Ethics 2000 Commission was appointed • 2000 – The Ethics 2000 Commission issued its first report • 2001 – The Ethics 2000 Commission issued its second report • 2002 – The ABA House of Delegates completed its voting on accepting or rejecting the Ethics 2000 commission’s recommendations • Why does it Matter? • Eventually, jurisdictions that used the ABA Model Rules are likely to adopt the Ethics 2000 changes • Paralegals working in jurisdictions that will adopt the Ethics 2000 changes will need to adjust their actions accordingly • For example, the Ethics 2000 version of MR 1.10 has an accepted Comment that allows for the screening of paralegals in order to prevent imputed disqualification of the law firm

  5. Jurisdictions and Their Sources of Attorney Ethics Rules

  6. Types of Attorney Discipline • Private Reprimand • This might protect the attorney’s name from being disclosed • Short Suspension • Usually, the attorney’s reinstatement is automatic after the suspension • Significant Suspension • Usually, the attorney needs to apply for reinstatement • Disbarment • Disbarment is not always permanent (Florida has a five year disbarment option)

  7. For Disbarment A lawyer lied under oath This lawyer was also the president The Ark. Disc. Comm. Recommended disbarment Against Disbarment The president never lied The president’s under oath statements concerned his private life The president was acting as a client, not as a lawyer The Arguments For and Against the Clinton Disbarment

  8. Understanding Legal Ethics Professional Ethics Case Law Rules of Professional Ethics Ethics Opinions

  9. How to Brief a Case • Facts What are the key facts important to the case’s resolution? What carries the “story” forward? • Issue What is the legal conflict presented? What does the court need to resolve? What are the key facts that make the issue come alive? What legal conflict needs to be created if none is presented? • Holding What is the answer to the issue, or issues? • Reasoning What is the court’s explanation for its decision? What rule of law, or ethics rule, is being applied? What key facts are discussed in the reasoning? • Decision What is the court’s conclusion?

More Related