1 / 13

I Thematic Session: Disaster Resilient cities, schools and hospitals

I Thematic Session: Disaster Resilient cities, schools and hospitals. Learning on Urban Disaster Risk in the Caribbean summary of findings Oxfam GB Isabelle Bremaud. 14-03-2011. 4 case studies of DP experiences by Oxfam GB and Intermon Oxfam – by Mark Pelling

donal
Télécharger la présentation

I Thematic Session: Disaster Resilient cities, schools and hospitals

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. I Thematic Session: Disaster Resilient cities, schools and hospitals Learning on Urban Disaster Risk in the Caribbean summary of findings Oxfam GB IsabelleBremaud 14-03-2011

  2. 4 case studies of DP experiencesby Oxfam GB and Intermon Oxfam – by Mark Pelling • Workshop – August 2010 70 participants – 19 countries 48 institutions- organizations And in collaborationwiththeurbanriskplatform

  3. Generation of risk in Caribbeancities • Accumulation (contermporydevelopment gaps + unresolvedpastchallenges) • Coastalareas • Concentration of services in a single exposedcity + visibility of risk

  4. Main learning - facilitating factors Un(der) employment can provideopportunitiestoengagethroughmoneyorfoodforworkschemes Logisitics are easier, bothtomobilisepeople and materials Inter-agencycommunicationiseasier

  5. Main learning – hindering factors Hazard • Oftengeneratedoutsideurbanspaces • natural and social hazardsoverlap Vulnerabilities • Intense and concentrated populations • Concentrated land use means fewer options for mitigation measures

  6. Mainlearning – hinderingfactors (cont.) • Rapid demographicgrowthexceedsmanagementcapacity • Failuretoregulateland use and building • Heterogeneouscommunitiesgeneratetensions • In-migrantshave no knowledge of local disasterhistory • Skills, knowledge and social connectionslostthroughout-migration

  7. Mainlearning – hinderingfactors (cont.) • Little flexibility and longworking-commutinghours in theurbaneconomylimits time forparticipation • Drugscrimeis a barrierespeciallyforyouth • Little establishedsolidarityorhistory of collectiveaction • Volunteersmaybeavailablebutwant-needpaiment • Leadersputthemselves at personnal – politicalrisk

  8. Mainlearning – hinderingfactors (cont.) • City and local government are too busy to take on new policy agendas, even if mandated • Overlapping roles between municipal, regional and national government entities • Few urban social development NGOs that could act as actors - implementers • Need agreement from government for interventions

  9. Mainlearning – hinderingfactors (cont.) • Educational system, policy system etc may be oriented towards rural development e.g. restricting access to technical skills like civil engineering • Relocation is difficult and costly • Risk may be seen as only amenable to large scale engineering projects.

  10. Otherconsiderationsfromtheaugust 2010 workshop • infrastructure-based vs socially-based responses • The importance of scale • climate change key issue in urban context

  11. Remaining gaps: forresearch and assessment • Root causes and symptoms • Social difference • Measuring effectiveness

  12. Remaining gaps: forpolicydevelopment • Decentralisation • Grassrootframework • Private sector • Structure of thesystem - Local committesfunction and scope in urbancontext

  13. ThankyouGracias Información de contacto: IsabelleBremaud Institución Oxfam GB Correo electronico Presentador ibremaud@oxfam.org.uk

More Related