1 / 6

CFRG discussion on ChaCha20

CFRG discussion on ChaCha20 . mcgrew@cisco.com TLS Working Group @ IETF 89. Background. TLS chairs asked CFRG chairs to provide an update on ChaCha and Poly1305 (2/23) CFRG chairs offered input on new ECC CFRG agenda included questions

donkor
Télécharger la présentation

CFRG discussion on ChaCha20

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CFRG discussion on ChaCha20 mcgrew@cisco.com TLS Working Group @ IETF 89

  2. Background • TLS chairs asked CFRG chairs to provide an update on ChaCha and Poly1305 (2/23) • CFRG chairs offered input on new ECC • CFRG agenda included questions http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/89/slides/slides-89-cfrg-0.pptx • We suggest that the request from TLS to CFRG be formalized • To what questions should we seek answers?

  3. ChaCha20 and Poly1305 • Points made in CFRG • ChaCha20 should not be used as a stream cipher • AEAD construction is preferable • draft-nir-cfrg-chacha20-poly1305-00 should be advanced and reviewed more • The composition of ChaCha and Poly1305 is novel and needs review • Let’s seek input from Dan Bernstein • Hum on “do you think this function is adequately secure to be used in TLS ciphersuites?” • Few agreed, 1 or 2 disagreed, many felt unsuited to respond • Note that the room has a lower proportion of cryptanalysts than list • Suggestion: • Proceed with draft-nir-cfrg-chacha20-poly1305-00, expecting tweaks, with a one month period to review draft-nir-cfrg-chacha20-poly1305-00 in CFRG

  4. New ECC • Curve25519 • draft-josefsson-tls-curve25519-01 • Montgomery form • Not suitable for signatures • draft-ladd-safecurves-01 • Montgomery and Edwards form • DJB: safecurves not all equally well performing

  5. CFRG Conclusion on New ECC • Focus on doing one new curve family • Aim for reusability beyond TLS (SSH, IKE, …) • CFRG should have an interim meeting dedicated to the discussion of New ECC • Teleconference will be accessible to more CFRG members • 20+ interested in participating • Early April (one month to prepare) • Identify goals in advance • Solicit written input and presentations

  6. What questions should we ask CFRG? • Should be specific to drafts when possible • Should be written down • Email sent to CFRG and TLS list • Could be debated on list and finalized by chairs • Should have a cutoff date (~3 months) • Should consider general suitability, and not just security • Should provide goals, or accept input on goals

More Related