70 likes | 225 Vues
This document examines the jurisdiction regarding probate and administration as detailed in the Probate and Administration Act sections 40-90. It highlights significant case law, including landmark cases like "In the Goods of Morton" (1864) and "In re Carlton" (1924). The document explores various aspects of grants of representation and the position of NSW Trustees based on notable cases. This comprehensive analysis serves to clarify the legal precedents and statutory provisions relevant to the jurisdiction of probate in New South Wales.
E N D
JURISDICTION OF THE PROBATE • Probate and Administration Act, ss 40, 40A, 40B, 40C, 40D, 41, 41A, 63, 74, 90
JURISDICTION • In the Goods of Morton (1864) 164 ER 1338 (para. 8.55) • In re Carlton [1924] VLR 237 (para. 8.50) • In the Goods of Tamplin [1897] P 39 (para. 8.60) • New York Breweries v A-G [1899] AC 62 (para. 8.70) • Boyd v Leslie [1964] VR 728 (para. 8.140)
Estates pending grants of representation (1) Position of NSW Trustee • Andrews v Hogan (1952) 86 CLR 223 (para. 9.20) • Oxford Meat Co v McDonald (1963) 63 SR (NSW) 423 (para. 9.25)
Estates pending grants of representation (2) Executor de son tort • Re Birch (1951) 51 SR (NSW) 345 (para. 9.35) • Cash v Nominal Defendant (1969) 90 WN (pt 1) (NSW) 77 (para. 9.40) • Will of Colless (1941) 41 SR (NSW) 133 (para. 10.45)
Grants of representation • Bath v British and Malayan Trustees (1969) 90 WN (pt 1) (NSW) 44 (para. 10.55) • In the Will of Sands (1944) 44 SR (NSW) 281 (para. 10.60) • Bates v Messner (1967) 67 SR (NSW) 187 (para. 10.75) • Re Devoy [1943] St R Qd 137 (para. 10.40)
Grants of representation • Re N [1950] VLR 139 (para. 10.70) • Bailey v Bailey (1924) 34 CLR 558 (para. 10.85) • Tyrrell v Painton [1894] P 151 (para. 10.90)