1 / 21

Indicators

Indicators. Legislative and financial base support for civil society Civil society participates in the design and implementation of policies Civil society is actively involved in the ratification and promotion of the Convention

dorian
Télécharger la présentation

Indicators

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Indicators • Legislative and financial base support for civil society • Civil society participates in the design and implementation of policies • Civil society is actively involved in the ratification and promotion of the Convention • In addition, this chapter will explore some key indicators of the ‘capacity to partner’: • Resources • Capacities • Connections

  2. Two spheres • At the national level – civil society partnership with government • At the international level – civil society’s participation in the Convention processes

  3. Data sources • Civil society survey • More in-depth interviews with civil society leaders • QPRs • Interviews with people involved in expert facility missions • UNESCO Culture for Development Indicators (Governance Dimension) • CIVICUS’ annual survey of members of the Affinity Group of National Associations (AGNA)

  4. QPR analysis • Three kinds of QPR • Many more examples of civil society-initiated actions than state-initiated actions • Issues of attribution, impact, how much is new

  5. Civil society-led actions – domestic (1) • Advocacy • Austria, Chile, Cuba, Demark, France, Germany, Kenya, Madagascar, Palestine, Portugal, Quebec, Senegal, Slovakia, Switzerland, Tunisia, Uruguay, Zimbabwe • Statements, inputs to consultations and legislative processes • Resources and creative industry development, trade deals, creative freedom • Civil society meetings • Afghanistan, Austria, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Cuba, Denmark, France, Kenya, Quebec, Slovakia, Sweden, Switzerland, Tunisia, Zimbabwe • Trade deals, resourcing, cultural policy

  6. Civil society-led actions – domestic (2) • Research and generating data • Austria (gender and social class-disaggregated data), Brazil, Canada, France, Indonesia, Italy (cultural employment, social impact, audience development), Kenya, Slovakia, Switzerland (gender gaps), Zimbabwe • Disseminating publications • Austria, Brazil, Denmark, France, Indonesia, Italy, Kenya, Slovakia, Spain • Online: Brazil, Canada, Chile, Indonesia, Quebec, Slovakia, Switzerland, Tunisia, Zimbabwe • New groups / networks • Austria, Greece, Kenya, Palestine, Senegal, Tunisia, Vietnam, Zimbabwe

  7. Civil society-led actions – domestic (3) • Training • Afghanistan, Brazil, Indonesia, Kenya, Palestine, Tunisia, Zimbabwe • Monitoring • Brazil, Germany, Italy, Kenya, Latvia, Switzerland, Zimbabwe • Public debate • Austria, Belarus, Chile, Germany, Senegal, Slovakia • Little reported • Working with broader civil society (only reported in relation to trade deals)

  8. International civil society actions • Regional networking (Cuba, Greece, Indonesia, Italy, Portugal, Slovakia) • Bilateral working (Austria, France, Kenya, Spain, Zimbabwe) • As part of IFCCD (Austria, Canada+Quebec, France, Portugal, Slovakia, Sweden, Switzerland)

  9. State-led actions • Invited inputs to consultations • Afghanistan, Austria, Brazil, Canada, Cuba, Cyprus, Germany, Latvia, Namibia, Palestine, Tunisia • Working parties / commissions / advisory bodies • Brazil, Latvia, Quebec, Slovakia • Awareness-raising activities • Afghanistan, Germany, Quebec • Involving civil society in data collection • Estonia, Lithuania, Madagascar

  10. Challenges (1) • Awareness, knowledge and understanding • Austria, Bulgaria, France, Indonesia, Namibia, Slovakia, Switzerland, Tunisia, Zimbabwe • Low civil society awareness, lack of understanding by those working in the field • Resources • Austria, Canada, Chile, Indonesia, Latvia, Senegal, Switzerland, Zimbabwe • Funding cutbacks, ongoing civil society capacity challenges

  11. Challenges (2) • Civil society-state connection • Belarus, Lithuania , Switzerland • Representativeness and connectedness of civil society • Brazil, Canada, Switzerland • Lack of an enabling legislative framework

  12. Solutions • Improved dialogue and partnership across sectors • Belarus, Indonesia, Italy, Lithuania, Namibia, Tunisia, Zimbabwe • Better connections of civil society in the culture field • Italy, Lithuania, Tunisia • International working • Brazil, Italy, Lithuania • Capacity strengthening • Brazil, France, Italy • Better connections with other fields • Austria, Italy

  13. AGNA survey • No relevant members: • Bolivia, Jamaica, Kyrgyzstan, Latvia, Nepal, Nicaragua, Pakistan, Tanzania, Venezuela • Some relevant members: • Argentina, Colombia, Japan, Togo, Turkey • Sizeable number of relevant members: • Finland, Mexico

  14. Introduction This chapter will examine the extent to which the 2005 Convention has opened up new opportunities for civil society and States Parties to work together on issues related to cultural policy, as well as the extent to which civil society has been able to engage with the processes of the Convention itself. It will explore what opportunities have been enabled by States Parties for civil society to engage, what independent actions civil society has taken and what capacity challenges civil society encounters in seeking to engage.

  15. SDGs • SDG 16 • Develop effective, accountable and transparent institutions at all levels. • Ensure responsive, inclusive, participatory and representative decision-making at all levels. • SDG 17 • Encourage and promote effective public, public-private and civil society partnerships, building on the experience and resourcing strategies of partnerships

  16. Understanding partnerships • Restating the Convention’s definition of civil society • Why partnerships are important • Supply and demand side of partnerships • Capacity to partner • Methodology

  17. Summary of actions taken • Summaries of key action types from QPRs: civil society-led, state-led • Use these to establish a typology of responses • Case study of a successful/sustainable action drawn from QPRs

  18. Four dimensions • Laws, regulations, policies – indicator 1, 2 • Access to financial resources – indicator 1 • Capacities – indicator 2 • Connections – indicator 2 • How enabling are these? • What have the changes and challenges been? • What have been the actions to improve these? • What is needed?

  19. Indicator 3 • Awareness • Participation in national level processes • Participation in international processes

  20. Case studies • History of civil society’s engagement with the Convention • Innovative approach to resourcing • A sustained and growing network • A partnership that has overcome challenges and achieved impact

  21. Recommendations • Laws, regulations and policies • Resources • Capacities • Connections • Civil society engagement with Convention processes, including QPRs • Indicators for the next report

More Related