1 / 4

Systems Engineering Effectiveness Committee SE Effectiveness Study Redux

Systems Engineering Effectiveness Committee SE Effectiveness Study Redux. NDIA SE Division Meeting 18 August 2010. History. For the projects that did the least SE, only 15% delivered the best project performance. SE Effectiveness Study conducted by NDIA in 2006-2007

dragon
Télécharger la présentation

Systems Engineering Effectiveness Committee SE Effectiveness Study Redux

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Systems Engineering Effectiveness CommitteeSE Effectiveness Study Redux NDIA SE Division Meeting 18 August 2010

  2. History For the projects that did the least SE, only 15% delivered the best project performance. • SE Effectiveness Study conducted by NDIA in 2006-2007 • Surveyed 46 programs to identify relationships between SE activities and project performance as measured by cost, schedule, and requirements conformance. • Conducted anonymously to encourage participation and maintain confidentiality • Found strong relationships between Project Performance and IPT, Architecture, Trade Studies, and Requirements activities. PROJECT PERFORMANCE vs. TOTAL SE CAPABILITY 1.00 Best Performance ( x > 3.0 ) Moderate Performance ( 2.5  x  3.0 ) Lower Performance ( x < 2.5 ) 12% 56% 15% 59% 46% 0.75 0.50 13% 39% 0.25 31% 29% For the projects that did the most SE, 56% delivered the best project performance 0.00 Lower Capability ( x  2.5 ) N = 13 Moderate Capability ( 2.5 < x < 3.0 ) N = 17 Higher Capability (x  3.0 ) N = 16 Gamma = 0.32 p = 0.04 Report available at http://www.sei.cmu.edu/library/abstracts/reports/08sr034.cfm

  3. Recent Events • Briefed Mr. Welby on 06-May on the results of the study • Recognized the value of the study • Wanted a wider sample to confirm results • Formed consortium with IEEE Aerospace and Electronics Society to expand study to a wider audience • Committee chaired by Bill Lyons (Boeing) • Support from OSD (Mike McLendon) • Support from USAF (AFMC/EN) • Technical support from SEI

  4. Current Efforts • Developing a research proposal for future work 1: Identify SE activities linked to improved program performance via survey of defense suppliers 2: Assist OSD in updating policy, guidance, training, and tools to deploy proven practices in acquisition programs 3: Assist OSD in establishing a means of routinely collecting data from future programs to facilitate continuous improvement • Preparing an update to the prior survey • Improving questionnaire • Improving solicitation and sampling • Improving analysis You will be receiving an email surveying the willingness of your organization to participate in this study

More Related