1 / 15

Adapting SME Learning Environments for Adaptivity

Adapting SME Learning Environments for Adaptivity. Angelo Wentzler, Alexandra Cristea, Egbert Heuvelman and Paul De Bra Information System Department, Faculty of Mathematics and Computing Science Eindhoven University of Technology. Outline. Introduction LAOS MOT, Content-e, AHA!

Télécharger la présentation

Adapting SME Learning Environments for Adaptivity

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Adapting SME Learning Environments for Adaptivity Angelo Wentzler, Alexandra Cristea, Egbert Heuvelman and Paul De Bra Information System Department, Faculty of Mathematics and Computing Science Eindhoven University of Technology

  2. Outline • Introduction • LAOS • MOT, Content-e, AHA! • Content-e/LAOS • Conclusion

  3. Motivation • There is a serious need of personalization and adaptation in commercial environments • AEH can provide a systematic framework • Our work is one of the first attempts of marrying the two worlds: commercial & AEH

  4. LAOS • domain model (DM) • goal and constraints model (GM) • user model (UM) • presentation model (PM) • adaptation model (AM)

  5. From LAOS layers to adaptive product

  6. Content-e/LAOS • Equivalent to MOT, functioning in C-e • Extend functionality • Improve UI How: • New Concept / Goal map content-types • Import / publish CAF • Use AHA! for delivery

  7. Conclusion • MOT was viewed as more stable, while C-e/LAOS was more appealing • More specific/limited is appreciated over flexible/complex • MOT: functional (SUS), C-e/LAOS: overall impression (specific questionnaire) • C-e/LAOS: higher learning threshold; might in the long run be more appreciated for its extra options. • This work represents one of the first attempts to systematically create an authoring environment for personalized learning in a commercial setting, therefore adapting commercial learning environments for adaptivity.

  8. Thank you.http://www.stack.nl/~angelo/

More Related