1 / 4

State of debate and standard table for EGSS

State of debate and standard table for EGSS. Anton Steurer – Eurostat E2 – Environmental accounts and climate change. London Group meeting 12-14 November 2013, ONS, London. Handbooks OECD/Eurostat manual 1999 Eurostat handbook 2009 SEEA 2012 New ILO guidelines (Oct. 2013)

dritch
Télécharger la présentation

State of debate and standard table for EGSS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. State of debate and standard table for EGSS Anton Steurer – Eurostat E2 – Environmental accounts and climate change London Group meeting 12-14 November 2013, ONS, London

  2. Handbooks OECD/Eurostat manual 1999 Eurostat handbook 2009 SEEA 2012 New ILO guidelines (Oct. 2013) Eurostat practical guide 2013 (minimalistic method – 'survey-free') Classifications (EP and RM is covered) CEPA (OK – will eventually need some fine-tuning of explanatory notes) CReMA and provisional part of CEA for resource management Categories (producers, products) (some categories not that helpful, e.g. specialist producers as very many EGSS producers are not specialist – shares rather than specialisation principle; or sole purpose products, environmental technologies breakdown – none required by EU Regulation) Is what we have good for now or do we need more? Existing guidance 2

  3. A lot but few so far make comprehensive estimates Presentations to come by Netherlands, Sweden, France Methods quite variable Some have specific surveys Some use registers (or make their special EGSS registers) but without survey Some use only existing sources – often activity-based Demand varies at national level Markets, jobs, exports – sometimes with focus on specific sectors (renewable energy) Increasingly related to green economy, partly going beyond EGSS Often jobs are the key interest Work in countries 3

  4. Comprehensive estimates require data integration – do we need more conceptual guidance on how e.g. 'environmental technologies' relate to the capital formation for EPE, terms we use in different modules (adapted, cleaner products…)? Scope (only 'natural' resources – e.g. forests/timber; natural hazards out – only forest fires in, water supply?) Classification for RM part (to split basic data by resources requires heroism – is lower data quality really worth it – do users need monetary data by resource – e.g. recycling activities by materials?) Shall we test first or rush to change classifications? EGSS and green economy. How do you see this? Simple core table proposed: industries by environmental domains for output, jobs, exports, VA – is that enough? LET US RETURN TO THESE QUESTIONS DURING OR AFTER THE COUNTRY PRESENTATIONS Outstanding issues 4

More Related