1 / 31

The Semantics of Classification Motivating the New Part 2

The Semantics of Classification Motivating the New Part 2. Jim Carpenter Bureau of Labor Statistics. WG2 Meetings Santa Fe, NM January 27-31, 2003. Note on this Presentation.

dshell
Télécharger la présentation

The Semantics of Classification Motivating the New Part 2

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Semantics of ClassificationMotivating the New Part 2 Jim Carpenter Bureau of Labor Statistics WG2 Meetings Santa Fe, NM January 27-31, 2003

  2. Note on this Presentation • This presentation focuses on the semantics of “Object X is classified by category Y” and describes the new attributes to record the semantics. • Other new attributes were discussed in the Open Forum tutorial on Part 2. These attributes are presented in the UML diagrams at the end of this presentation, although they have been updated.

  3. Outline • The nature of classification • Meaning of the proposition: • “Object X is classified by category Y” • Use cases of classification in 11179 MDR • Attributes of classification schemes that should be in a 11179 MDR • Proposed model of classification region

  4. Definition of Classification Scheme • the descriptive information for an arrangement or division of objects into groups based on characteristics, which the objects have in common. • Will use for motivation

  5. Process of classifying Dividing objects into groups MDR should provide descriptive information to facilitate this process Result of classifying Description information that helps us to understand the classified item MDR should provide descriptive information to understand the statement “object X is classified by the category Y” Views of Classification“descriptive information for the division of objects into groups” Following use cases

  6. Fundamental Proposition • facilitate the classification process • facilitate understanding the classified item The MDR should provide the attributes that:

  7. Example of Classification • Scheme for classifying writing instruments • Writing instrument: an object used for making marks on some material • Differentiating characteristic: material in the writing instrument that makes the mark • MaterialName of category • chalk chalk • ink pen • lead pencil • “Object X is classified as a pen” has meaning

  8. Meaning • “Object X is classified as a pen” is equivalent to • “Object X is a writing instrument that uses ink to make marks” • We naturally substitute the category label with the description of the category • Just like a concise terminological definition • Experiment • If I give you a funny looking object and tell you it is a pen, you know more about it if you know about “pen”. • If you don’t know, then the classification scheme provides the descriptive information

  9. Object X is classified as a “pen” • Object X is a subtype of the class pen. • But not all classifications are subtype relationships

  10. Question • What is the meaning of: • Data element X is classified by the category of “pen” ? • Answer: Data element X is associated in some way with objects that are pens.

  11. Data element X is classified by the category of “pen” • Data element identifier: xxx • Data element name: Pen Ink Color • Context: office supply database • Object class: pen • Property: color of ink • Data element concept: ink color for a pen • Data element xxx has a data element concept with the object class “pen”

  12. Use Case Setting Classify data elements according to the day of the week in which they were created. • Objects to classify: data elements • Characteristic used to classify: the day of the week in which an object was created • Category names: Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, Saturday, Sunday • Category type description: • day of the week in which an event occurred

  13. Common Semantics • Day of the week is a time interval • A time interval describes an event (occurrence)

  14. Use Case Setting, cont. • Data element - Identifier : 111 • Data element - Creation date: Monday, January 27, 2003

  15. Use Case 1: Classification Scheme 1 • Classification Scheme – Identifier : 0001 • Classification Scheme – Name : Days of the week • Classification Scheme – Type name : List • Category – Values : Mon, Tue, Wed, Thu, Fri, Sat, Sun • Category – Type name : abbreviation for the name of a day of the week (when an event occurred) • Result : the proposition “data element 111 is classified by the Category with value = Sun” “D.E. 111 is associated with an event that happened on a Sunday”

  16. Use Case of current MDR model: Missing Information • Known by the classifier: • Data element creation date • “Data element 111 was created on a Wednesday.” • “was created on” is an attribute of the classification relationship • to be supplied by the classifier

  17. Conclusion 1 • The classification relationship in ISO 11179 needs an attribute • The attribute should describe the characteristic of the administered item used by the classifier

  18. Use Case 2: Classification Scheme 2 • Classification Scheme – Identifier : 0002 • Classification Scheme – Name : Days of the week • Classification Scheme – Type name : List • Category – Values : 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 • Category – Type name : Numerical designation for a day of the week (when an event occurred) • Result : the proposition “data element 111 is classified by the Category with value = 7, which represents a day of the week”

  19. Missing Information • Attribute value of the classification relationship • Creation date • Meaning of the value 7 • Which day of the week is 7? • Could be provided by a reference document • Inconvenient • Not machine readable

  20. Conclusion 2 • Need an attribute of Category that states the meaning of the Category value

  21. Complex Categories • Complexity from users viewpoint • Multiple characteristics • Fuzzy boundaries • Technical terms • Numerous types and instances of category relationships

  22. Conclusion 3 • Users need more than concise terminological definitions of categories • Included concepts • Excluded concepts • Examples • Illustrations (picture, sound, animation, …)

  23. Non-English Language Speaking User • All information is missing • Need translations of attribute values

  24. Conclusion 4 • Designations and definitions of terms should be represented in the languages of the MDR users

  25. Proposed Model Summary of Changes • Make category an administered item • Expand Terminological Entry class • Signs – language independent • More definitional types • Make classification relation an administered item • Other useful attributes

  26. Note: The following diagrams use inheritance as discussed this morning. Administration_Record is removed as an attribute from all Administered_Item types

More Related