1 / 31

RodDirect : Two-Dimensional Input with Stylus Knob

RodDirect : Two-Dimensional Input with Stylus Knob. Motoki Miura and Susumu Kunifuji Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, JAPAN MobileHCI2006@Espoo Finland. Outline. Motivation RodDirect Concept Applications Implementation of Prototype Experiment Conclusion.

dsickels
Télécharger la présentation

RodDirect : Two-Dimensional Input with Stylus Knob

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. RodDirect :Two-Dimensional Input with Stylus Knob Motoki Miura and Susumu Kunifuji Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, JAPAN MobileHCI2006@Espoo Finland

  2. Outline • Motivation • RodDirect • Concept • Applications • Implementation of Prototype • Experiment • Conclusion

  3. Conventional Input Devices for Portable Handhelds • Consideration of Size and Weight • Common input devices • Buttons/Hot keys • Touch sensitive panel with stylus pen • Mini Keyboard • Jog Dial • Touch panel is versatile, but… • Often requires precise tapping for small GUI objects • Stylus pen is necessary for precise tapping • Drawing/Storing actions disturb smooth interaction

  4. Augmented Approach • Exploit physical movement with natural interaction • Efficient use of device portability • Embed sensors • Position & Orientation [“Chameleon”, Fitzmaurice et al. 1993] • Tilting [Rekimoto 1996] • Tactile(Haptic) [Harrison et al. 1998][Hinckley et al. 2000] • Data transfer in real world context • HyperPalette [Ayatsuka et al. 1999] • Toss-it [Yatani et al. 2004]

  5. Trend of new device development • Attaching more sensors on handheld • Detect natural behavior of human with handling devices • Recognize intension of user • We agree the direction of approach • However, we should make full use of conventional hardware as much as possible

  6. RodDirect • Novel, simple and versatile interaction technique • RodDirect utilize stylus pen as a knob/cylinder • Two types of stylus movement in the stylus holder are associated with parameters • (1) Twist (Rotation) • (2) Push/Pull (Sliding) • User can control two parameters intuitively and simultaneously

  7. Metaphors(Scrolling and Moving object)

  8. Block Breaker Space Invader Application Switching Scheduler Map Browser Applications using RodDirect

  9. Application: Map Browser 2D Scrolling Zooming by rotating while pressing button “Crutching” by pressing button

  10. Application Switching(conceptual demo) Twisting for switch command Pulling out determines screen mode

  11. Application: Scheduler(mixed with touch screen interaction) 2D Scrolling Tapping & Holding to move item

  12. Game: Block Breaker Controlling pad position directly by rotating/sliding

  13. Game: Space Invader Controlling cannon position directly by sliding Shot by rotating (player can control laser speed by rotation speed)

  14. Prototype(Optical mouse sensor detects movements of stylus) 800 counts/inch, 420 counts/rotation, 1200 counts/one-way slide

  15. Implementation of Prototype • PC receives location of stylus as ordinary mouse position • PC-PDA connection (ActiveSync) to transmit location to PDA • Application on PDA processes the location USB port TCP/IP

  16. User’s Merits • Natural and Intuitive • User can operate with normal stylus • Physical constraint of holder decreases difficulty of operation • non-dominant hand control is also possible • Friction keeps the position of stylus • User can suspend/resume tasks immediately

  17. Manufacturer’s Merits • The sensor is relatively small • It can be embedded in the device • Few restriction in exterior design • Not expensive • Provides new experience for users

  18. Tasks and Interactions with handheld Cost of Operations (incl. Pre/Post Tasks) Touch Panel with Stylus RodDirect Hot Key Cursor Keys Jog Dial Launch Application 1D Scrolling 2D Scrolling Discrete Tap&Drag (ex.Inputting Text) Task Complexity

  19. Experiment • Purpose: Investigate efficiency of RodDirect • Task: Scroll to center target & press button • Target appears on 1280x1200 virtual screen • 9 participants • 4 input methods • Drag • Walk • Tilt • RodDirect • Captured time to complete task

  20. Drag(panning by pushing background)

  21. Walk(similar to Touch-n-go [MacKay et al. 2005])

  22. Tilt (PhidgetAccelerometer attached on behind)

  23. RodDirect

  24. Result (Estimated marginal means) Bonferroni pair-wise comparison revealed: Rod<<Walk Rod<<Tilt Drag<<Walk Drag<<Tilt Walk<<Tilt But no significant differences found between Rod and Drag ** **

  25. Fitting to MacKenzie model(MT = a + b log2(Distance/Size + 1) Slope (b) • Rod:547 • Drag:769 • Walk:844 • Tilt:785 Walk Tilt Rod Drag

  26. Findings • RodDirect can operate as fast as tap&drag • Rod becomes faster when larger target size, longer target distance • User Comments • Drag suits for precise control • Drag exhausted user by back/forth dragging • Participants disrupted by reflections from room light in Tilt • Tilt is not best for screen-attentive tasks • Touch panel was worn out by frequent scratch

  27. Conclusion • RodDirect • novel, simple and versatile interaction technique • Suitable for mobile appliances • Relatively small sensor • Less influence on exterior design if embedded • Effective for scrolling task • RodDirect can be applied not only PDA with stylus but also “rod antenna” of cellular phone

  28. Questions & comments • Thank you for your attentions!! • Contact: • Motoki Miura • miuramo@jaist.ac.jp • http://css.jaist.ac.jp/~miuramo/

  29. Longer Stylus • Length: • Original: 94mm • Longer : 110mm (+16mm) (To Prevent pushing in entirely)

More Related