1 / 9

A critical look at your sources

A critical look at your sources. ”Dagspressens kilder” ( Sources in the Daily Press ) Center for Journalism and Education , 2006. 2.359 oral sources. 3 month/06. 751 answers. 8 out of 10 sources are men. 55% have an academic degree (5% in DK).

duff
Télécharger la présentation

A critical look at your sources

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A critical look at your sources

  2. ”Dagspressens kilder”(Sources in the DailyPress)Center for Journalism and Education, 2006 • 2.359 oral sources. 3 month/06. 751 answers. • 8 out of 10 sources are men. • 55% have an academic degree (5% in DK). • 69% interviewed +10 times during last 3 years (applies to less than 1 % of Danish population). • 10% only representing them selves (not organisations, companies, professions, institutions.)

  3. …”Dagspressens kilder” • 25% do not feel informed on the contents of the article. • 33% do not feel sufficiently informed on how they will be quoted. • 2 out of 3 judge the journalist as well prepared. • 30% judge that the journalist wanted them to say something in particular. • 5% feel they were quoted wrongly. • 12% acknowledge quotes, but not the context. • 20 % find that the paper overdramatises. • 25% find the headline misleading. • 50% identify one or more mistakes and inaccuracies in the text.

  4. Assess your sources

  5. Assess your sources

  6. The motives of your sources • Who (individuals/institutions) have a self-interest in the case? • Who has an interest in disclosure? And who do not? • To whom would a solution to the problem be an advantage? To whom wouldn’t it? … double check with an extra source if the information is controversial.

  7. Testingcompetence… by Jesper Tynell Winner of the Cavling-prize, 2009

  8. As far as cases are concerned… • Case = an example of something = inductive • Strategically representative selection • Validation of sources: Representativity, loyalty, tendency, expertise…

  9. Credibility of written sources Scientific publications, non-fiction books and dictionaries have undergone control: • Set of rules • Peer reviewing • Control by publisher • Private publisher?

More Related