html5-img
1 / 15

Ethics in Research

Ethics in Research. The Ethical Standards of the American Psychological Association http://www.apa.org/ethics/ (2002 Ethics code, to be effective June 1, 2003) http://www.apastyle.org

duff
Télécharger la présentation

Ethics in Research

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Ethics in Research • The Ethical Standards of the American Psychological Association http://www.apa.org/ethics/ (2002 Ethics code, to be effective June 1, 2003)http://www.apastyle.org • Ethics in Cyberspace Research: Consent, Privacy and Contribution http://www.rider.edu/users/suler/psycyber/ethics.html • Ethical and legal aspects of human subjects research in cyberspace (a report from the American Association for the Advancement of Science) http://www.aaas.org/spp/dspp/sfrl/projects/intres/main.htm

  2. Ethics for Social Scientists / psychologists* • General Standards • Evaluation, assessment, or intervention • Advertising and other public statements • Therapy • Privacy and confidentiality • Teaching, training supervision, research, and publishing • Forensic activities • Resolving ethical issues * Thanks to Lawrence R. Gordon, University of Vermont (http://www.uvm.edu/~lgordon/)

  3. Research Ethics (background) • Where it comes from • Cost-benefit considerations (Utilitarianism) • Respect for human dignity (Deontology) • Major principles underlying modern codes • Respect for persons - autonomy/consent • Beneficence - max benefit and min harm • Justice - benefits and burdens distributed fairly

  4. Ethics of Human Research • We can’t just do whatever we want! • Protocols prepared and submitted to the Institutional Review Board (IRB) for approval • IRB needs to give you permission to do your study

  5. What Is the IRB? • Committee responsible for reviewing all proposed research involving human participants at all schools receiving federal funds for research • Members include faculty members from different departments, at least one community member, at least one nonscientist (at least 5 total members)

  6. IRB @ MSU (UCRIHS) • At MSU, The Office of Research Ethics and Standards (ORES), houses among other things, the human subjects review • IRB at MSU is called UCHRIHS (University Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects) • http://www.msu.edu/user/ucrihs/] • Contains forms, FAQ, Tutorials, Regulations and contant info.

  7. What the IRB Does • Its chief function: Considers costs and benefits of the research • Is the research question worth the use of human participants? • Because human participants do not need to participate in studies, their rights are the highest priority

  8. Issues • Voluntary participation • Informed consent • need to know what might keep them for consenting • need to be able to consent • need to know the right to withdraw • Coercion • vulnerable populations • payment/compensation

  9. Issues • Deception • Is the value of the study worth it? • Alternatives? [Must be last alternative!] • Needs to be explained ASAP [Dehoaxing] • Debriefing • Explain purpose of study • remove bad feelings [Desensitizing] • get information • thank participants

  10. Informed consent • Documented agreement with participants • clarifies the nature of the research and the responsibilities of each party • Use language that is reasonably understandable • Obtained prior to any data collection • Explain significant factors that may influence the person's willingness to participate • risks, discomfort, adverse effects, or limitations on confidentiality and other aspects about which the person may inquire. • Tell participants that they can withdraw from the research at any time • If participants are legally incapable of giving informed consent, provide an appropriate explanation, obtain the person's consent, AND obtain permission from a legally authorized person • Inform participants of how data will be used (privacy/confidentiality) • Provide an opportunity to the participants to obtain information about research findings • Give contact information for researcher and IRB official

  11. Issues • Experimenter conduct • PI has assumes all responsibility for fair treatment of participants (e.g. by assistants) • 6 P’s of conduct • Present • Prompt • Prepared • Polite • Private • Professional

  12. Submitting Protocols • Exempt from review • Expedited review • Full review

  13. Full review • Full review • study of vulnerable populations • use of physically invasive techniques (e.g. drugs, exercise, x-rays) • psychological or emotional distress • behavior manipulation (includes ALL deception) • sensitive data (with ID) (e.g. drugs, sex, crime) • videotaping (potential for ID)

  14. Expedited review • Expedited review • voice recordings (e.g. study of speech defects) • studies of behavior w/o manipulation or stress • study of existing documents that are not publicly available • use of noninvasive clinical assessments (such as weight, sensory acuity, EKG, but NOT x-rays)

  15. Exempt from review • Exempt from review • Educational practices • Anonymous survey, interview, or naturalistic observation (no identifiers) • Study of existing data, documents, or archival records that are publicly available (no ID) • Consumer surveys (ex. Quality of dining hall food)

More Related