1 / 28

JAPAN'S SPENT FUEL AND PLUTONIUM MANAGEMENT CHALLENGES

Asian Energy Security Project Meeting Beijing, Oct 31-Nov.2, 2007. JAPAN'S SPENT FUEL AND PLUTONIUM MANAGEMENT CHALLENGES. Tadahiro Katsuta and Tatsujiro Suzuki University of Tokyo. CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. Spent fuel management 3. Plutonium balance 4. Impact of Chetsu Earthquake

dulcea
Télécharger la présentation

JAPAN'S SPENT FUEL AND PLUTONIUM MANAGEMENT CHALLENGES

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Asian Energy Security Project Meeting Beijing, Oct 31-Nov.2, 2007 JAPAN'S SPENT FUELAND PLUTONIUM MANAGEMENT CHALLENGES Tadahiro Katsuta and Tatsujiro Suzuki University of Tokyo CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. Spent fuel management 3. Plutonium balance 4. Impact of Chetsu Earthquake 5. Conclusion

  2. 1. Introduction Japan’s Plutonium Policy: Current Status • At the end of 2006, Japan had 25.3t(f) (~37.8t(t)) of separated plutonium in Europe recovered under contracts with BNFL and COGEMA and about 6.7t from its domestic reprocessing plants, i.e. the total is now 44.5 t. • On March 31, 2006, the Rokkasho reprocessing plant by JNFL started active testing. If this plant operates at nominal capacity, about 8t of plutonium will be recovered annually. During 2006, 738kg of Pu was separated at Rokkasho plant. • Japanese utilities plan to recycle all plutonium, into existing Light Water Reactors (LWRs), but no single reactor has been loaded with MOX fuel as of May 2006. • Therefore, it is likely that more plutonium will be accumulated once the Rokkasho plant starts operating. • Rokkasho plant is now preparing for its full operation planned in early next year.

  3. Rokkasho Reprocessing Plant • - Owner : JNFL • - 800 tHM /yr of capacity • - 3,000tHM of spent fuel storage capacity. • Active testing started March.31, 2006. • -Plutonium separated and MOX powder was produced in November, 2006 • - Commercial operation: early 2008

  4. Reactor on-site pools are filling up Table 1. Amount of Spent Fuel at Each Site (As of end of March 2004)

  5. Three types of spent fuel storage capacity At-reactor storage Storage capacity: 16,940 tHM/16 sites On-site dry cask storage is not allowed by local governments (Fukushima-1 was allowed one time). Rokkasho reprocessing plant Storage capacity:3,000tHM (Received 1,776 tHM as of April 2006) Construction cost: $18 billion Mutsu Interim storage site Dry storage Capacity : 5,000 tHM Operation: 2010 (Status : Planned) Construction cost: $0.8 billion (including dry casks)

  6. Cost Estimates of Rokkasho Project (40-year life time cost) Report of Study Group on Cost Estimate for Nuclear Fuel Cycle (METI, 2004)

  7. Cost Comparison of Fuel Cycle Options by Japan Atomic Energy Commission (2004) *Assumes that all nuclear power plants would be shut down due to shortage of spent fuel storage capacity and have to be replaced with fossil-fueled power plants.

  8. Comparison of projected cumulative spent fuel discharges with currently planned storage capacity 2024 2028 Figure 1. Cumulative inventory and management of spent fuel in the future

  9. Spent fuel storage Inflexibilities • Although total spent fuel storage capacity is large enough to store spent fuel up to mid-2020s, inflexibilities of spent fuel storage management make situation more complex: • No transfer of spent fuel between utilities is allowed. • Storage pool at Rokkasho plant (3,000tU) is divided into three sections; 1,000tU of PWR spent fuel, 1,000tU of BWR spent fuel and 1,000tU for either type of spent fuel. • Mutsu interim storage facility (5,000 tU) owned by only two utilities; TEPCO (4000 tons), and JAPCO (1,000tU). • As a result, some utilities with PWRs may face shortage of spent fuel storage as early as 2014. • Local mayors and governor of Aomori demand that the recycling program continue in order to guarantee that spent fuel will be removed from the site within 50 years.

  10. 3. Plutonium balance Current stockpile Figure 3. Management of plutonium (As of March 2004)

  11. Japan’s Pu Stockpile (2006)

  12. 81tPu 74tPu 81tPu 37tPu 48tPu 6tPu Figure 4. Future plutonium stockpile until 2020 Assumption (a) Oversea Pu used first (b) Overseas Pu not recycled before 2020 (c) Operation of Rokkasho postponed After2005 : Demand MOX fuel:From 2012, 9.3 tPu/year/plants x18 plants Monju: re-start from 2010, 0.47tPU/year Supply Rokkasho reprocessing plant: start from 2006 (2 -6tPu/year from 2006-2009, 8tPu/year from 2010)

  13. Progress of MOX fuel program as of September 2006 ? ?

  14. Japan's stockpile of separated plutonium

  15. Plutonium Balance Change in Japan (2006)

  16. Plutonium stockpile owned by Utilities (as of September 2006, tonPuf) Unit: tons of fissile Plutonium • 平成22年までに16-18基でMOX利用を実施する予定。 • 実施の当初は海外で加工したMOX燃料を利用する予定。国内MOX燃料加工工場竣工後は、同工場で製造したMOX燃料も順次利用予定。

  17. Utilities’ Pu stockpile in Japan(kgPuf)

  18. Impact of Advanced Fuel Cycle (GNEP)

  19. Impact of Advanced Fuel Cycle(GNEP)

  20. Chuetsu Earthquake and its impact on Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Nuclear Plant(1) • Kashiwazaki-Kariwa is the biggest nuclear plant site in Japan, hosting 7 units, total of 7965 MWe net capacity. • On July 16, 2007, a strong earthquake occurred at 10:13 am, with a magnitude of M 6.8(JMA scale). Its epicenter was about 16 km north of the site, and its hypocenter below the seabed of the Jo-chuetsu area in Niigata (37.33N, 138.37E) • At that time, four reactors were in operation (Unit 2,3,4,and 7), and the other three (Unit 1,5, and 6) were in shutdown for planned outages. • All of them are now shutdown and safety investigation has started, and it is not clear when plants will be back into operation

  21. Chuetsu Earthquake and its impact on Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Nuclear Plant(2)

  22. Siting in Japan would be more difficult Source: Katsuhiko Ishibashi, “Nuclear Plant safety from viewpoint of Seismic Conditions,” (2003

  23. Design Base Earthquake and Actual Responses

  24. Niigata Earthquake and its Impacts on Kashiwazaki-Kariha Nuclear Plant Source; Tokyo Electric Power

  25. Impact of Earthquake • TEPCO lost 7GW of planned nuclear capacity, and there was concern about supply during summer peak. • Estimated peak was ~ 61-65 GW and total planned capacity without nuclear was 58 GW • Emergency power supply arrangements plus start up of old power plants added up about 4.7 GW, and finally peak demand conservation contract saved its peak (~ 1GW), and peak was finally met. • TEPCO lost about 600 billion yen(~$5.5 bill) due to the earthquake, resulting in estimated 95 billion yen loss for FY 2007. • Future repair cost is uncertain • Need to purchase CO2 credit from overseas

  26. HLW Disposal Issues • Voluntary siting process of HLW disposal facility • In Jan, 2007, Mayor of Toyo-town of Kochi Prefecture officially requested “investigation of feasibility” of HLW disposal facility (first such request made by a town) • The town would receive \1 billion just for this investigation. • The proposal was accepted by METI, but local opposition stopped the process • In Oct. 2007, METI adv. comm. proposed to modify the process • Gov’t can propose to local community

  27. Conclusions (1) • Japan continues its reprocessing program, and the Rokkasho reprocessing plant separated 0.7 ton of plutonium during its test operation. • Meanwhile plutonium recycling program has made little progress. • As a result, Japan’s plutonium stockpile has steadily increased to 44.5 ton. • The introduction of advanced fuel cycle would increase cost of fuel cycle and will not likely to reduce area requirements.

  28. CONCLUSION (2) • The Chuestu earthquake and shutdown of all 7 nuclear plants at Kashiwazaki-Kariwa site have had significant impact on Japan’s nuclear debate. • Safety concerns remain, and future of KK plants are uncertain • Financial risk and CO2 emission increase are also sources of concern

More Related