1 / 55

U.S. Pork Industry Structure 2003

U.S. Pork Industry Structure 2003. Glenn Grimes Professor Emeritus University of Missouri-Columbia. Website: http://agebb.missouri.edu/mkt/index.htm. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study , 2003. Estimated Total Number of Operations & Share of U.S. Slaughter in 2003 by Size Category.

dung
Télécharger la présentation

U.S. Pork Industry Structure 2003

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. U.S. Pork Industry Structure 2003 Glenn Grimes Professor Emeritus University of Missouri-Columbia Website: http://agebb.missouri.edu/mkt/index.htm

  2. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2003 Estimated Total Number of Operations & Share of U.S. Slaughter in 2003 by Size Category University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board, Monsanto Choice Genetics, and Land O’ Lakes.

  3. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2003 Share of Annual U.S. Hog Slaughter by Year and Size Category University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board, Monsanto Choice Genetics, and Land O’ Lakes.

  4. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2003 Number of Large Firms Producing Hogs University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board, Monsanto Choice Genetics, and Land O’ Lakes.

  5. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2003 Percent of U.S. Slaughter Hogs Marketed by Large Firms University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board, Monsanto Choice Genetics, and Land O’ Lakes.

  6. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2003 Percent of U.S. Slaughter Hog Marketingsby Type of Owner University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board, Monsanto Choice Genetics, and Land O’ Lakes.

  7. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2003 Growth* Planned 2000-03 as Reported in 2000 Study Compared to Actual Growth 2000-03 *Percent increase in number of head marketed. University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board, Monsanto Choice Genetics, and Land O’ Lakes.

  8. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2003 Growth* Planned by Each Size Group2003-04 and 2003-06 *Percent increase in number of head marketed. University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board, Monsanto Choice Genetics, and Land O’ Lakes.

  9. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2003 How Firms Plan to Expand 2003-06 (percent of firms responding in each size category) University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board, Monsanto Choice Genetics, and Land O’ Lakes.

  10. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2003 Percent of Firms That Made a Profit in 2001 Firm Size (1,000 head mktd annually) University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board, Monsanto Choice Genetics, and Land O’ Lakes.

  11. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2003 Percent of Firms That Made a Profit in 2002 Firm Size (1,000 head mktd annually) University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board, Monsanto Choice Genetics, and Land O’ Lakes.

  12. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2003 Percent of Firms That Made a Profit in 2003 Firm Size (1,000 head mktd annually) University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board, Monsanto Choice Genetics, and Land O’ Lakes.

  13. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2003 Percent of Firms That Started Marketing Hogs Prior to 1975 Firm Size (1,000 head mktd annually) University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board, Monsanto Choice Genetics, and Land O’ Lakes.

  14. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2003 Percent of Firms That Started Marketing Hogs 1976 to 1985 Firm Size (1,000 head mktd annually) University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board, Monsanto Choice Genetics, and Land O’ Lakes.

  15. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2003 Percent of Firms That Started Marketing Hogs 1986 to 1995 Firm Size (1,000 head mktd annually) University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board, Monsanto Choice Genetics, and Land O’ Lakes.

  16. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2003 Percent of Firms That Started Marketing Hogs after 1995 Firm Size (1,000 head mktd annually) University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board, Monsanto Choice Genetics, and Land O’ Lakes.

  17. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2003 Production Information 2003 (average of percentages reported by individual firms) University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board, Monsanto Choice Genetics, and Land O’ Lakes.

  18. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2003 Networking Activities of ProducersMarketing 1,000-50,000 Head Annually Percent University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board, Monsanto Choice Genetics, and Land O’ Lakes.

  19. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2003 Percent of Hog Operations Producing Other Commodities University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board, Monsanto Choice Genetics, and Land O’ Lakes.

  20. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2003 Other Commodity Considered Most Important Produced on Hog Operation (percent of total firms in size category) University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board, Monsanto Choice Genetics, and Land O’ Lakes.

  21. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2003 Percent of Litters Sired by Artificial Insemination 1997, 2000, 2003 University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board, Monsanto Choice Genetics, and Land O’ Lakes.

  22. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2003 Where Firms Acquired Semen (percent of firms responding in size category) University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board, Monsanto Choice Genetics, and Land O’ Lakes.

  23. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2003 Firms Finishing Canadian-born Pigs University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board, Monsanto Choice Genetics, and Land O’ Lakes.

  24. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2003 Method of Pricing Canadian-born Pigs (percent of firms that fed Canadian pigs by size category) University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board, Monsanto Choice Genetics, and Land O’ Lakes.

  25. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2003 How Firms Marketed Slaughter Hogs, 2003 (percent of firms in size category) University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board, Monsanto Choice Genetics, and Land O’ Lakes.

  26. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2003 Number of Different Packers Sold to in 2003 (percent of firms responding in size category) University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board, Monsanto Choice Genetics, and Land O’ Lakes.

  27. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2003 Percent of Marketings Soldto Producer’s Largest Buyer University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board, Monsanto Choice Genetics, and Land O’ Lakes.

  28. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2003 Distance Hogs Are Hauled for Slaughter (percent of firms responding in size category) University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board, Monsanto Choice Genetics, and Land O’ Lakes.

  29. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2003 Percent of Hogs Sold under Marketing Contracts (average of percentages reported by each size group) University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board, Monsanto Choice Genetics, and Land O’ Lakes.

  30. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2003 Flexibility in Marketing Dates (percent of firms responding in size category) University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board, Monsanto Choice Genetics, and Land O’ Lakes.

  31. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2003 Percent of Hogs Sold on Carcass Merit Basis Percent 99 98 97 95 93 89 88 85 81 80 80 77 77 76 70 71 63 60 Firm Size (thousand head mktd. annually) University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board, Monsanto Choice Genetics, and Land O’ Lakes.

  32. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2003 Use of Hog Futures Market by Hog Firms (percent of firms responding in size category) University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board, Monsanto Choice Genetics, and Land O’ Lakes.

  33. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2003 Why Hog Producers Do Not Use Futures or Options (percent of firms responding in size category) University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board, Monsanto Choice Genetics, and Land O’ Lakes.

  34. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2003 Opinions on Marketing Contracts:Help Coordinate Slaughter Firm Size (thousand head mktd annually) Strongly disagree Strongly agree University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board, Monsanto Choice Genetics, and Land O’ Lakes.

  35. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2003 Opinions on Marketing Contracts:Felt They Were Treated Fairly under Contract Firm Size (thousand head mktd annually) Strongly disagree Strongly agree University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board, Monsanto Choice Genetics, and Land O’ Lakes.

  36. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2003 Opinions on Marketing Contracts:Plan To Continue Marketing with a Contract after Current One Matures Firm Size (thousand head mktd annually) Strongly disagree Strongly agree University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board, Monsanto Choice Genetics, and Land O’ Lakes.

  37. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2003 Opinions on Marketing Contracts:Should Be More Closely Monitored by USDA Firm Size (thousand head mktd annually) Strongly disagree Strongly agree University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board, Monsanto Choice Genetics, and Land O’ Lakes.

  38. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2003 Opinions on Marketing Contracts:Prefer To Market All Hogs on Cash Market Firm Size (thousand head mktd annually) Strongly disagree Strongly agree University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board, Monsanto Choice Genetics, and Land O’ Lakes.

  39. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2003 Opinions on Marketing Contracts:Have Caused Lower Cash Market Prices Firm Size (thousand head mktd annually) Strongly disagree Strongly agree University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board, Monsanto Choice Genetics, and Land O’ Lakes.

  40. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2003 Opinions on Marketing Contracts:Producers with Contracts Get Higher Prices Firm Size (thousand head mktd annually) Strongly disagree Strongly agree University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board, Monsanto Choice Genetics, and Land O’ Lakes.

  41. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2003 Opinions on Marketing Contracts:Packers Showed Undue Preferencein Offering Contracts Firm Size (thousand head mktd annually) Strongly disagree Strongly agree University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board, Monsanto Choice Genetics, and Land O’ Lakes.

  42. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2003 Opinions on Marketing Contracts:Should Be Made Illegal Firm Size (thousand head mktd annually) Strongly disagree Strongly agree University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board, Monsanto Choice Genetics, and Land O’ Lakes.

  43. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2003 Percent of U.S. Hogs Raised by Firms That Are Contractors, 1997-2003 University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board, Monsanto Choice Genetics, and Land O’ Lakes.

  44. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2003 Percent of U.S. Hogs Raised under Contract, 1997-2003 University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board, Monsanto Choice Genetics, and Land O’ Lakes.

  45. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2003 Average Length of Production Contracts University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board, Monsanto Choice Genetics, and Land O’ Lakes.

  46. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2003 Training and Supervision Provided byContractors to Growers University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board, Monsanto Choice Genetics, and Land O’ Lakes.

  47. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2003 When Growers Began Contract Production University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board, Monsanto Choice Genetics, and Land O’ Lakes.

  48. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2003 Grower Plans after Contract Expires University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board, Monsanto Choice Genetics, and Land O’ Lakes.

  49. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2003 Number of Contractors Per Growerin Last 5 Years University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board, Monsanto Choice Genetics, and Land O’ Lakes.

  50. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2003 Contractors’ Expectations for Next 5 Years University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board, Monsanto Choice Genetics, and Land O’ Lakes.

More Related