1 / 57

Geoff Willis

Risk Manager. Geoff Willis. Geoff Willis & Juergen Mimkes. Evidence for the Independence of Waged and Unwaged Income, Evidence for Boltzmann Distributions in Waged Income, and the Outlines of a Coherent Theory of Income Distribution. Income Distributions - History.

eddy
Télécharger la présentation

Geoff Willis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Risk Manager Geoff Willis

  2. Geoff Willis & Juergen Mimkes Evidence for the Independence of Waged and Unwaged Income, Evidence for Boltzmann Distributions in Waged Income, and the Outlines of a Coherent Theory of Income Distribution.

  3. Income Distributions - History • Assumed log-normal - but not derived from economic theory • Known power tail – Pareto - 1896 - strongly demonstrated by Souma Japan data - 2001

  4. Income Distributions - Alternatives • Proposed Exponential - Yakovenko & Dragelescu – US data • Proposed Boltzmann - Willis – 1993 – New Scientist letters • Proposed Boltzmann - Mimkes & Willis – Theortetical derivation - 2002

  5. UK NES Data • ‘National Earnings Survey’ • United Kingdom National Statistics Office • Annual Survey • 1% Sample of all employees • 100,000 to 120,000 in yearly sample

  6. UK NES Data • 11 Years analysed 1992 to 2002 inclusive • 1% Sample of all employees • 100,000 to 120,000 in yearly sample • Wide – PAYE ‘Pay as you earn’ • Excludes unemployed, self-employed, private income & below tax threshold “unwaged”

  7. Three Parameter Fits • Used Solver in Excel to fit two functions: • Log-normal F(x) = A*(EXP(-1*((LN(x)-M)*((LN(x)-M)))/(2*S*S)))/((x)*S*(2.5066)) Parameters varied: A, S & M

  8. Three Parameter Fits • Used Solver in Excel to fit two functions: • Boltzmann F(x) = B*(x-G)*(EXP(-P*(x-G))) Parameters varied: B, P & G

  9. Reduced Data Sets • Deleted data above £800 • Deleted data below £130 • Repeated fitting of functions

  10. Two Parameter Fits • Boltzmann function only • Reduced Data Set F(x) =B*(x-G)*(EXP(-P*(x-G))) It can be shown that: B =10*No*P*P where No is the total sum of people (factor of 10 arises from bandwidth of data:£101-£110 etc)

  11. Two Parameter Fits • Boltzmann function, Red Data Set F(x) =B*(x-G)*(EXP(-P*(x-G))) B =10*No*P*P So: F(x) =10*No*P*P*(x-G)*(EXP(-P*(x-G))) Parameters varied: P & G only

  12. One Parameter Fits • Boltzmann function, Reduced Data Set F(x) =10*No*P*P*(x-G)*(EXP(-P*(x-G))) Parameters varied: P & G only • It can be further shown that: P =2 / (Ko/No – G) where Ko is the total sum of people in each population band multiplied by average income of the band • Note that KoWill be overestimated due to extra wealth from power tail

  13. One Parameter Fits • Boltzmann function analysed only • Fitted to Reduced Data Set F(x) = B*(x-G)*(EXP(-P*(x-G))) • Can be re-written as: F(x) =10*No*(2/((Ko/No)-G))*(2/((Ko/No)-G))*(x-G)*(EXP(-(2/((Ko/Pop)-G))*(x-G))) Parameter varied: G only

  14. Defined Fit • Ko & No can be calculated from the raw data • G is the offset - can be derived from the raw data - by graphical interpolation Used solver for simple linear regression, 1st 6 points 1992, 1st 12 points 1997 & 2002

  15. Defined Fit • Used function: F(x) =10*No*(2/((Ko/No)-G))*(2/((Ko/No)-G))*(x-G)*(EXP(-(2/((Ko/Pop)-G))*(x-G))) • Parameter No derived from raw data • Parameter Ko derived from raw data • Parameter G extrapolated from graph of raw data Inserted Parameter into function and plotted results

  16. US Income data • Ultimate source: US Department of Labor, Bureau of Statistics • Believed to be good provenance • Details of sample size not know • Details of sampling method not know

  17. US Income data • Note: No power tail Data drops down, not up Believed to be detailed comparison of manufacturing income versus services income • Assumed that only waged income was used

More Related