270 likes | 376 Vues
Explore the challenges and growth of second-year students in college, addressing academic, social, and personal development. Compare and contrast institutional approaches, discuss student outcomes, and share program interventions. Dive into theories and models guiding student development phases, from acculturation to mastery. Gain insights on sophomores' struggles, including the sophomore slump and crisis points. Discover program suggestions and initiatives across different institutions to support students' transition from the first to the second year.
E N D
The Second Year Experience: More than just a re-mix Nora Allen Assistant Director for Advisor Development Undergraduate Affairs, Office of Advising Practice
Presentation Preview • Group work • Overview of student development • Second-year psyche • Issues that face second-year students • Compare and contrast by institutional type • Programs and interventions • Q&A
Second-year vs. Sophomore • Sophomore is marked by an arbitrary collection of credit hours • Some students come in with enough credits to be a sophomore • Some students don’t have enough credits to be a sophomore after the first year • Cause of stress
Group Time! • What were your experiences as a second-year student? • How did the second year differ from the first year?
What theory can do for you…. • Explain and chart student growth and development • Guide programs, policies, and procedures • Explain student attrition
The main questions that development seeks to answer….. • What interpersonal and intrapersonal changes occur while the student is in college? • What factors lead to development? • What aspects of the college environment foster or hamper growth? • What are the developmental outcomes institutions seek to achieve? According to Knefelkamp, Widick, & Parker (1978)
Tinto’s model of student departure • Pre-entry variables: aptitude, abilities, background • Institutional interactions that modify the pre-entry variables • Level of commitment to goals and institution • Motivation
Student Development Phases in Higher EducationAllen 2005 • Acculturation • Crystallization • Immersion • Mastery, Completion, Closure
Acculturation • Pre-entry variables • External focus: distracted by demands of new environment • Expectations vs. reality • May not be ready for serious planning and goal setting
Social Organizational Stages as Applied to StudentsYarbrough, B., and Brown, M.H. (2003). • Anticipatory • Encounter • Metamorphosis
Crystallization • Internal conflict • Why am I here? • Disillusioned • More settled and looking for direction • Advising, career, financial planning are critical
Now what?!?!?! • Competencies • Values • Motivation • Cost/benefit • Choices
Molly Schaller’s Stages of the Sophomore Year • Random exploration • Focused exploration • Tentative choices • Commitment
Lemons & Richmond (1987) • Applied Chickering’s vectors to second-year students • Achieving competence • Developing autonomy • Establishing identity • Developing purpose
Crisis and Conflict • Erikson (1969): concept of crisis and commitment • Parks (1986): faculty serve as center for conflict by challenging students to move beyond set worldview; faculty assist students in working to rebuild belief systems
What is Sophomore Slump? • Lemons & Richmond (1987) define the slump as a period of confusion • Feldman & Newcomb (1969) define the slump as a time of dissatisfaction with college and self • Lack of involvement and motivation
Pattengale’s (2000) Categories: • Academic • Developmental • Institutional
Academic • Not committed to a major • Forced to choose a major too soon • More difficult curriculum • Competition for grades • No “Plan B” • Loss of scholarship • Delayed consequences of negative behavior • Disconnect between general education and major • Weed out
Developmental • Uncertain about life goals • Cost/benefit • What am I here • Lack of support • Co-curricular issues • Honeymoon period is over • Career and academic advising • Financial concerns
Institutional • No connection to the institution • Bad experiences • Fiscal mismanagement • Housing loss • Value fit • Support • Transition into major doesn’t pick up where first-year initiatives left off
Student Learning Outcomes • What do you want students to: • Know • Do • Value • Look for common themes, categories, or groupings: • Academic • Developmental • Institutional
Who are your students? • Type of institution • Student characteristics/demographics • Student sub-groups
Public vs. Private (Juillerat, 2000) • Private • High expectations • Issues related to academic excellence • Connected to campus experience; pride in campus • Value opportunities for self exploration • Public • High value on services • Financial aid and billing policies • Faculty availability • Advising • Registration process; availability of courses; course offerings • Intramurals • Library staff • Health services • Parking
Program Suggestions • Pattengale • Sophomore orientation in each major • Intentional support • Study abroad, internships, service learning • General Education • Leadership opportunities; campus work opportunities • Beloit College: Second-Year Initiative • Colorado College: Sophomore Jump Program • Colgate: Second-Year Experience • Kennesaw State: Year 2 • Second-year seminar • Support to connect with major, navigate gen. ed., plug into campus resources, closely monitor progress • Sophomore peer leaders
Group Time Re-Mix • What are the issues that face second-year students at UofL? • What policies, procedures and programs could help or hamper student success? • How can Academic and Student Affairs collaborate to foster second-year success?
Put it into practice…. • Review services and programs • Look at policy and procedure • Examine daily practice • Identify who needs assistance • Don’t simply repackage first-year programs
References • Chickering, A.W., & Reisser, L. 1993 (2nd edition). Education and identity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. • Erikson, E. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: Norton. • Feldman, K. A., & Newcomb, T.M. (1969). The impact of college on students. Washington, DC: Jossey-Bass. • Juillerat, S. (2000). Assessing the expectations and satisfaction levels of sophomores: How are they unique? In Schreiner, L. A., & Pattengale, J. (Eds.). (2000). Visible solutions for invisible students: Helping sophomores succeed. (Monograph No. 31). Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina, National Resource Center for the First-Year Experience and Students in Transition. • Lemons, L. J., & Richmond, D. R. (1987, Winter). A developmental perspective of the sophomore slump. NASPA Journal, 24 (3), 15-19. • Pattengale, J. (2007). Policy and practice to enhance sophomore success. In Tobolowsky, B. F., & Cox, B. E. (Eds.). (2007). Shedding light on sophomores: An exploration of the second college year. (The First Year Experience Monograph Series). Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina, National Resource Center for the First-Year Experience and Students in Transition. • Schaller, M.A. (2006, Nov.). Complexities in understanding the experience of sophomore students. Plenary address at the 13th National Conference on Students in Transition. St. Louis, MO. • Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. • Yarbrough, B. & Brown, M.H. (2003). Understanding organizational socialization: Insight for academic advisors. NACADA Journal. 23 (1&2), 66-73.