1 / 13

Oakland 2010 Program Committee Meeting

The Oakland 2010 Program Committee Meeting focuses on the review process for research submissions, particularly analyzing the status of papers submitted for review. Discussion topics include classifications of submissions into accept, reject, or revisit categories. The committee will assess the strengths and weaknesses of various papers, ensuring transparency while upholding reviewer anonymity. Final decisions will be made during the meeting, emphasizing the importance of constructive feedback and improvements from previous years. Participants are advised to communicate effectively and maintain confidentiality.

efrat
Télécharger la présentation

Oakland 2010 Program Committee Meeting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Oakland 2010Program Committee Meeting

  2. belittle authentication dischargeable bid electioneer indecipherable inheritability inexactitude public relations sanction vomit-grass

  3. Avail yourself of these means to communicate to us at seasonable intervals a copy of your journal, notes & observations of every kind, putting into cipher whatever might do injury if betrayed. Jefferson’s instructions to Captain Lewis

  4. Review Process SoK One-two more reviews One more review Two Reviews

  5. Reviewing Lowlights/Highlights Out of 237+30research+SoKsubmissions: • Number of papers with no “weak reject” (3) or worse reviews: • Number of papers with no “reject” (2) or worse reviews: • Total number of reviews with overall merit 6: 0 For every submitted paper, there is at least one PC member who thinks that paper should be rejected! 3+5 3+1 300% improvement from last year!

  6. Plan for Meeting • Today: (now-~5:30) • Discuss each “discuss” paper • Classify as: accept, reject, revisit • Research papers first, SoKpapers • Tomorrow: (8:30-1pm) • Make final decisions on all papers To see the discussion order: Search: order:order Target: Accept ~30 research papers, 2-5 SoK papers 2009: 26 2008: 28

  7. Discussion Lead • Summarize neutrally what the paper is about • Summarize the non-attending reviews • Present your own views • Update your review to reflect any important issues that come up in discussion

  8. Reminders • No decision is final until meeting closes • People in the room may have conflicts with other papers: avoid making unnecessary comparisons • Please don’t leak information that compromises reviewer anonymity

More Related