1 / 10

2010 Comprehensive Educational Facilities Master Plan (CEFMP) June 8 , 2010

2010 Comprehensive Educational Facilities Master Plan (CEFMP) June 8 , 2010. Purpose of Educational Facilities Master Plan.

eliana-pickett
Télécharger la présentation

2010 Comprehensive Educational Facilities Master Plan (CEFMP) June 8 , 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 2010 Comprehensive Educational Facilities Master Plan (CEFMP)June 8, 2010

  2. Purpose of Educational Facilities Master Plan • All 24 Maryland school districts must submit Educational Facilities Master Plans (EFMPs) to the State’s Interagency Committee on Public School Construction (IAC) annually on July 1st. • EFMP must reflect current state of & pending changes impacting Baltimore City Public Schools’ (City Schools’) facilities, in relationship to academic programs. • EFMP is intended as a blueprint for determining Capital Improvement Program (CIP) funding requests, submitted each fall. IAC decisions for funding CIP projects are based on data provided in our EFMP. • EFMP is also a repository of all facilities-related data for City Schools: building & program names; ages of buildings; grade ranges; dates of capital improvements (i.e. building additions/renovations, window, roof and door replacements, etc.).

  3. Components of Educational Facilities Master Plan • Per IAC instructions, our EFMP includes documentation of coordination with external agencies and School Board support: • Verification of agreement between City Schools and State Planners on ten-year enrollment projections • Documentation from the local planning agency declaring the EFMP consistent with the City’s comprehensive plan • School Board letter indicating the EFMP is accepted as a working document, as well as a Non-Discrimination statement

  4. Components of Educational Facilities Master Plan • Per IAC instructions, our EFMP also includes detailed information on the following: • Indication of City Schools’ goals, standards and guidelines • descriptions of organizational pattern; staffing ratios; transportation policies; districting and redistricting policies; provisions for Special Education, Alternative Education and Career Technology Education; and school closing procedures • Inventory and evaluation of all City Schools’ facilities • Community analysis • must be provided by local planning agency • Ten-year citywide enrollment projections for all grades • Facility needs analysis • anticipated capital improvement needs for the next several years

  5. Historical Context • 2005 - The IAC recommended that City Schools eliminate excess capacity from total school inventory, or risk losing capital funding. • Facility Solutions planning process evolved from that suggestion, with the School Board committing to the goal of eliminating 15% of City Schools’ inventory. • 2006 – The IAC required that City Schools submit a Comprehensive EFMP (CEFMP) to report our vision of how the school system will look in ten years (including specific building plans), and our plan for attaining that goal. • City Schools submitted first CEFMP, which indicated plans for realigning the school system based on the ten-year plan and process outlined in Facility Solutions. • 2007 - City Schools submitted second CEFMP, which updated plans for right-sizing, with emphasis on the 15% reduction goal. • 2008 - Due to many changes that impacted building closures & facility needs, City Schools submitted a basic one-year EFMP • 2009 - City Schools submitted cEFMP (more comprehensive than an EFMP, with a “one-year-plus” plan for City Schools’ facilities, instead of a 10-year plan) that reflected school changes to be implemented in SY09-10, and explained how decisions about future facilities changes are to be made through the Expanding Great Options (E.G.O.) process.

  6. 2010 Comprehensive EducationalFacilities Master Plan (CEFMP) • 2010 - Plan to submit CEFMP that reports on changes to be implemented in SY10-11, and provides a road map for future E.G.O. actions and facilities decisions. • The 2010 CEFMP: • reiterates the goal of providing a range of school options in communities throughout the City • explains the process by which City Schools arrived at the Expanding Great Options plan • details how, through Expanding Great Options, City Schools will utilize our facilities more efficiently, replace low-performing programs with better programs, increase options of choice for parents & students, and expand the school system’s portfolio. • documents the range of educational options in the nineteen sub-areas that were established under the Expanding Great Options plan • indicates anticipated impacts of Expanding Great Options actions on school facilities (to the greatest extent possible)

  7. Expanding Great Options in the 2010 CEFMP Short-Term Plan (SY09-10) • Close 5 under-performing academic programs(#s46,80,162,209and426) by end of 2009-2010 school year. • Provideturnaroundpartners to low performing schools(#s27,42,75,130,263,430,450). • Expand successful programs that are in demand and/or demonstrate potential(#s31,328,427). • Relocateprogramstooptimizeeducationalofferingsinsub-areas & provide more space (#s328,343,364). • OpennewTransformationSchools(#s374,377,378). Long-Term Plan (SY10-11 and beyond) • Review academic progress of all City Schools’ programs. • Consider citywide needs based on eight decision-making criteria, in context of academic programs’ status. • Assess most efficient uses of existing school facilities and outcomes in above categories over the next several years.

  8. 2010 CEFMP Timeline • May 18, 2010 - Review draft CEFMP with School Board’s Facilities Committee • May 25, 2010 - Present draft CEFMP to School Board as Informational item • June 8, 2010 - Present CEFMP at School Board meeting for vote • June 10, 2010 - Present CEFMP at Planning Commission hearing for vote and letter of approval (Required Element per IAC) • Week of June 21st- Print final version of document • Week of June 28th- Submit 2010 CEFMP to State

  9. Next Steps (following July 1st Submittal) • Secure cooperative use agreements with City Schools’ partners using dedicated space in City Schools buildings. (We must provide agreements to IAC for accurate record-keeping and SRC updates) • Continue SRC reviews of all City schools in order to obtain up-to-date State Rated Capacity and building utilization data. • Continue E.G.O. process: targeting Planning sub-areas that lack full complement of educational options & address under-utilized facilities. • Develop a longer-term view of City Schools’ programs and facilities, for ten-year plan to be reflected in next year’s CEFMP (July 2011).

  10. For More Information:Robin Allen, Director, Facilities Planning410-396-8699 / rallen05@bcps.k12.md.usJ. Keith Scroggins, Chief Operating Officer410-396-8722 / kscroggins@bcps.k12.md.us

More Related