1 / 13

Colangiocarcinoma extrahepático polipoideo-intraductal

Colangiocarcinoma extrahepático polipoideo-intraductal. Colangiocarcinoma intrahepático polipoideo-intraductal. Colangiocarcinoma extrahepático polipoideo-intraductal: plano radial SSFSE con TR 2528 y TE 1477.1, de grosor 50.0.

elina
Télécharger la présentation

Colangiocarcinoma extrahepático polipoideo-intraductal

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Colangiocarcinoma extrahepático polipoideo-intraductal

  2. Colangiocarcinoma intrahepático polipoideo-intraductal

  3. Colangiocarcinoma extrahepático polipoideo-intraductal: plano radial SSFSE con TR 2528 y TE 1477.1, de grosor 50.0

  4. Colangiocarcinoma extrahepático polipoideo-intraductal: plano coronal SSFSE con TR 1910 y TE 119.0, de grosor 7.0

  5. Colangiocarcinoma extrahepático polipoideo-intraductal: plano axial SSFSE con TR 1910 y TE 120.6, de grosor 3.0

  6. Colangiocarcinoma extrahepático polipoideo-intraductal: plano axial SSFSE con TR 1910 y TE 120.6, de grosor 3.0

  7. Colangiocarcinoma extrahepático polipoideo-intraductal: plano radial SSFSE con TR 2574 y TE 1431.0, de grosor 50.0

  8. RESULTADOS: HUMS

  9. CONCLUSIONES • Distribución ligeramente mayor en varones. • Localización hiliar la más frecuente. • TC > 90%, RM casi 50%. • AP adenocarcinoma en 96%. • Técnicas de elección para estudio: TC y RM para tumores intrahepáticos , ERCP y colangioRM para extrahepáticos.

  10. AGRADECIMIENTOS Al servicio de Anatomía Patológica del H. U. Miguel Servet de Zaragoza, en particular a la Dra. Ana Fuertes, por su colaboración con las imágenes de las piezas quirúrgicas

  11. BIBLIOGRAFÍA • 1. Jae Hoon Lim. Cholangiocarcinoma: Morphologic classification according to growth pattern and imaging findings. AJR 2003; 181:819-27. • 2. Slattery JM, Sahani DV. What is the current state of the art imaging for detection and staging of cholangiocarcinoma? Oncologist 2006; 11: 913-22. • 3. Bismuth H, Majno PE. Biliary strictures: classification based on the principles of surgical treatment. World J Surg 2001; 25: 1241- 44. • 4. Lee HY, Kim SH, Lee JM, Kim SW, Jang JY, Han JK, Choi BI. Preoperative assessment of resectability of hepatic hilar cholangiocarcinoma: combined CT and cholangiography with revised criteria. Radiology. 2006 Apr;239(1):113-21. • 5. Asayama Y, Yoshimitsu K, Irie H, Tajima T, Nishie A, Hirakawa M, Nakayama T, Kakihara D, Taketomi A, Aishima S, Honda H.Delayed-phase dynamic CT enhancement as a prognostic factor for mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Radiology. 2006 Jan;238(1):150-5.

  12. 6. Joon Koo Han, Byung Ihn Choi, Ah Young Kim, Su Kyung An, Joon Woo Lee, Tae Kyung Kim, and Sun-Whe Kim. Cholangiocarcinoma: Pictorial Essay of CT and Cholangiographic Findings. RadioGraphics 2002; 22: 173-187. • 7. Yuji Watanabe, Masako Nagayama, Akira Okumura, Yoshiki Amoh, Takashi Katsube, Tsuyoshi Suga, Shingo Koyama, Kohya Nakatani, and Yoshihiro Dodo. MR Imaging of Acute Biliary Disorders. RadioGraphics 2007; 27: 477-495. • 8. Jae Hoon Lim, Kee-Taek Jang, Dongil Choi, Won Jae Lee, and Hyo Keun Lim. Early Bile Duct Carcinoma: Comparison of Imaging Features with Pathologic Findings. Radiology 2006 238: 542-548. • 9. Mi-Suk Park, Tae Kyoung Kim, Kyyoung Won Kim, Sung Won Park, Jeong Kyung Lee, Jung-Sun Kim et al. Differentiation of extrahepatic bile duct cholangiocarcinoma from benign stricture: findings at MRCP versus ERCP. Radiology 2004; 233: 234-240.

More Related