170 likes | 459 Vues
WB VC 15.06.07. eGov Strategy of Kazakhstan. Arvo Ott, PhD, arvo.ott@ega.ee e-Governance Academy www.ega.ee. Framework. I N F O R M A T I O N P O L I C Y. President / Parliament. N A T I O N A L D E V E L O P M E N T S T R. eGOV A C T I O
E N D
WB VC 15.06.07 eGov Strategy of Kazakhstan Arvo Ott, PhD, arvo.ott@ega.ee e-Governance Academy www.ega.ee
Framework I N F O R M A T I O N P O L I C Y President / Parliament N A T I O N A L D E V E L O P M E N T S T R. eGOV A C T I O N P L A N Government Ministries Advisory Council
eGOV Development Strategy or Information Society Strategy? • Favourable conditions for development of competitive economy • E-democracy and effective, accountable and transparent public sector • Protecting national language and culture • Fight against Digital Divide
National Programme for eGOV (I) • Good long-run commitment • Situation analyses gives a good picture of the field • Good document for awareness building • Inventory of needs… perhaps prioritization mechanism is missing • Connection to more general state development plans and/or public reforms strategy • E-democracy and effective, accountable and transparent public sector. In theory sometimes eDemocracy issues are handled separately but these should be focused in some way.
National Programme for eGOV (II) • Relations to some general aspects and policy decisions (Information Society Policy?). • For example the role of private sector. In case of Estonia the strategy was to support private businesses and to avoid the appearance of new government institutions (see § 5.5.4.) • Needs to be neutral in different technologies and platforms. • Etc. • Some intention to give exact list of eServices might be complicated. Depends on the skills and state of implementing organizations. • Need for more focus on organizational and coordination matters?
National Programme for eGOV (III) • It would be good to describe shortly the process of preparation, prioritization, institutional support of annual action plans. It would be dangerous to make very exact project plans for more then 1 year. • There is the risk to over-regulate the field (see pg 2… at least 100 standards and technical regulations) • Academic approach is good… in theory… but there should be good balance between pragmatics • Some duplications in the text
National Programme for eGOV (IV) • Perhaps some more focus on shared services – both technology and organizational aspect • Infrastructure (incl. PKI, tools and methods of identification and auhtorization of users) • Organizational, legislative and technical aspects of data protection • Common use of GIS systems (Open GIS?) • State systems of Classification Systems • Common use and principles of State address system
Basic components under development: Infrastructure related: • eGov Portal • Certification Center for Government Agencies • PKI for National Identification Center • Public Access Points for eServices Regisisters and Information Systems: • Public (?) Database for Individuals • DB for Legal Entities • DB for Real Estate (legal rights and cadastre?) • Address Register DB • Electronic Document Management System • State register of Information resources and IS
Thank you for your attention! Arvo Ott, PhD Member of Management Board eGovernance Academy arvo.ott@ega.ee www.ega.ee