SlideServe
Télécharger Obtenir Pro
Menu
Accueil Pro
Préférences
ApparenceLight Aide et commentaires
© SlideServe · v2026

Programming and Evaluation

ellis avatar
ellis
13 diapositives · 261 Views · Sep 06, 2014

This engaging session, facilitated by Dave Lohrmann and Jim O'Neil, will empower participants to explore the journey of Coordinated School Health Programs (CSHP) implementation. Attendees will learn to articulate the progression and primary focus of CSHP for sustainable systemic change in Michiana. Key takeaways include distinguishing evaluation branches, reviewing team progress, and determining subsequent steps. This program emphasizes collaboration among stakeholders, policy implementation, resource allocation, and the importance of evaluation in enhancing health behaviors and academic performance in schools.

Programming and Evaluation - slide 1
01 / 13Programming and Evaluation
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

Programming and Evaluation
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation

  1. Programming and Evaluation Facilitated by Dave Lohrmann and Jim O’Neil (aka Data Man)

  2. By the end of this session, learners will be able to: • Explain the progression of CSHP implementation; • Recall the primary focus of Michiana as systemic change for sustainable CSHP; • Distinguish between two branches of evaluation; • Review their team’s progress to date and determine next steps.

  3. EvaluatingCSHP Implementation from Start to Finish (Part 1)

  4. CSHP Logic Model for School Districts ACTIVITIES SHORT-TERM OUTCOMES INTERMEDIATE OUTCOMES LONG-TERM OUTCOMES INPUTS OUTPUTS • Local CSHP • Infrastructure • Routinized • Secure Authorization • and Funding • External Funds • Local Funds • CSHP Policy • Component Policies Consistent with Best Practice • Review and Adoption Procedures • Assign Qualified Personnel • Component Staff • Administrator/ Coordinator • Internal Champion • Access Resources • Information Management Systems • Surveillance Data • Management Systems • Telecomm Systems • Training Systems and Workshops • Establish Communication and Linkages • School Health Team across components • School Health Coordinating Council • Between School District, Local Health Dept, and Community Providers • Stakeholders • Advocates • External Change Agent Engages Local School Corporations • Funding Source • Guidance • Federal Funds • State Funds • Private Funds • Professional Development • Awareness • Needs Assessment • Planning • Advocacy • Policy and Environmental Change • CSHP Development • Component Improvement • Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment • Technical Assistance • Needs Assessment • Policy and Environmental Change • Planning • CSHP Development • Component Improvement • Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment • Networking • Advocates • Stakeholders • Experts • Well-prepared and qualified teachers and staff • High Quality Curricula, Programs, and Services Across the Eight CSHP Components Selected or Developed and Delivered to Students, School Staff, and Families • CSHP Components • Coordinated Internally • Common Vision and Mission • Shared Resources • Joint Planning • Regular Meetings • Ongoing Communication • Public Health and Community Providers • Engaged • Joint Planning • Shared Resources • Ongoing • Communication • Approved Referral Systems Improved HealthAssessment Scores More Positive Health Attitudes Greater Intentions to Behave in Healthy Ways Positive In-School Health Behavior Changes Positive Out-of School Behavior Changes Improved Academic Achievement Scores Decreased Drop-Out Rates Better School Attendance Sustained Positive Health Behaviors Reduced Population Chronic Disease Reduced Population Infectious Disease Better Control of Health Care Costs Improved Community Health Increased Graduation Rates Improved Health Status and Quality of Life Elimination of Health Disparities Enhanced Economic Productivity

  5. Evaluation Concepts* • Evaluation is the act of placing a value, positive or negative, on something. • A less than full positive value implies that the object of the evaluation can be improved through some change. • The responsibility of the evaluator is to be an agent of change: working to improve a program in the many ways identified by evaluation results” • From Windsor, R., Baranowski, T., Clark, N., and Cutter, G. (1994). Evaluation of health promotion, health education, and disease prevention programs. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield publishing Co., p. 29.

  6. Two Branches of Evaluation • 1. CSHP (HSRC Characteristics 1-2) • A. Coordination, including essential structures AND • Policy, Planning • and Evaluation • 2. Separate aspects (HSRC Characteristics 3-11) • A. CSHP characteristics OR • B. Health issues across components/characteristics

  7. Where should we be now?

  8. RELATIONSHIP BETWEENSTATUS/INVENTORY ASSESSMENT, PROGRAM PLAN, PROCESS EVALUATION & PROGRAM GOAL GOAL = CSHP PROGRAM PLAN IMPLEMENTATION STATUS/INVENTORY ASSESSMENT (FORMATIVE EVALUATION) CONTINUOUS PROCESS EVALUATION 2-5 YEARS

  9. Implementation Guidance • Pre-Planning • Organizing • Orienting • Scoring • Reporting • Using results-- HSIP Author: David K. Lohrmann Engage and/or involve key school and community decision makers and stakeholders in every step!!!!!

  10. Reporting (pp. 111-113) • Generate ASCD output report (color-coded priorities) • Prepare work group summaries • Share across work groups • Draft overall summary report • Disseminate report

  11. Use Results(pp. 125-127) • Develop a plan based on prioritized recommendations • Use planning charts • Implement over time • Track progress (process evaluation)

  12. Progress Curve You are here Begin Year 1 Year 2 Year 3

  13. To Be Continued