1 / 16

EUROHEAT & POWER CLIMESPACE PRESENTATION

EUROHEAT & POWER CLIMESPACE PRESENTATION. Cooling – The New Market Dimension.  Paris District Cooling Network. Cooling – The New Market Dimension. Contents : Growing demand of cooling in Europe Paris Cooling Network Advantages and Environemental impact. Growing Demand in Europe.

eman
Télécharger la présentation

EUROHEAT & POWER CLIMESPACE PRESENTATION

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. EUROHEAT & POWER CLIMESPACE PRESENTATION

  2. Cooling – The New Market Dimension  Paris District Cooling Network

  3. Cooling – The New Market Dimension • Contents : • Growing demand of cooling in Europe • Paris Cooling Network • Advantages and Environemental impact

  4. Growing Demand in Europe • Market share of district cooling in Europe is between 2 to 3 TWh cooling • DC should be able to take 25 % share of market, which can be between 500 and 700 TWh in 2012 • Why Such an interest ? • The case of Paris

  5. Company • Concessionaire for Paris City since 1991 • Turnover in 2003 : 37 M€ • Turnover in 2004 : 43 M€ • Turnover in 2005 : 50 M€ • Shareholders : • Cofathec : 50 % • Elyo : 28 % • CPCU : 22 % • Investments since 1991 : 273 M€ • Staff : 76 people. Groupe SUEZ Groupe GdF

  6. Network • Power : 33 MW • Industrial chillers • Including 20 MWh for ice storage • Cooling Tower • Power : 8 MW • Cooling Tower • Power : 42 MW • Indusrtial chillers • Ice Storage under construction • Cooling Tower • Under construction : 52 MW • Industrial chillers • Free cooling • River Cooling • Power : 52 MW • Industrial chillers • River Cooling • Capacity : 12 000 m3 • Equivalent installed power : 10 MW • Power : 33 MW • Industrial chillers • River Cooling

  7. Connected power {275 MW 260 235 210 185 160 MW 135 110 85 60 35 10 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Years

  8. Environnemental Comparison between Paris Network and Conventional cooling • Climespace • 5 Sites • 1 Network • 400 Clients Conventional Cooling - 400 conventional Chillers  Studies asked to an independant university specialized in cooling solution (Armines)  Comparison : Electric consumption Frigorific gases impact Global Nuisances : Water Chemical Product Sanitary Risk Noise Visual Impact Local Nuisances : Architecture constraint Space saving

  9. Comparison Between Climespace Network and owned conditionning system • Method : • Analyze of Climespace Network performance • Electricity cnsumption • Energy sold • Frigorific gases leakage • Analyze of Climespace Client profile and Consumption • Comparison : • ARMINES took figures of conventional chillers per client profile • ARMINES made a model changing all our client putting adapted conventional chillers, corresponding to their consumption profile

  10. Clients per activity

  11. Total Equivalent Warming Impact • This index determines CO2 impact, taking into account: • Direct effect: frigorific gases leakage (measure for CLIMESPACE, and estimation for conventional chillers) • Indirect effect: Electricity consumption (Climespace consumption / performance data for conventional chillers)

  12. Water and chemical products Consumption • Water consumed by Climespace / consumption estimated for autonomous chillers with cooling tower

  13. Global Environnemental Impact Electrical Consumption - 20% Global Nuisances Frigorific Gas Impact - 30% TEWI (Total Equivalent Warming impact) -30% Water Consumption - 55 % - 80% Chimical Product

  14. Local Environnemental Impact Sanitary Risk Noise reduction Visual Impact Local Nuisances Architectural Impact Space Saving

  15. local impact

  16. local impact

More Related