1 / 18

Breaking Down the Argument

Breaking Down the Argument. Step 1: Identify the conclusion Step 2: Identify the given premises Step 3: Identify the implied premises. Breaking Down the Argument. Step 1: Identify the conclusion. Words like hence, thus , so, and therefore signal the conclusion.

emelda
Télécharger la présentation

Breaking Down the Argument

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Breaking Down the Argument Step 1: Identify the conclusion Step 2: Identify the given premises Step 3: Identify the implied premises

  2. Breaking Down the Argument Step 1: Identify the conclusion. • Words like hence,thus, so, and therefore signal the conclusion. • Words like because or since signal premises. No reptiles have fur, and since all snakes are reptiles it follows that no snakes have fur Conclusion= Eat your peas because they are good for you. Conclusion=

  3. Breaking Down the Argument Step 1: Identify the conclusion. • Words like hence,thus, so, and therefore signal the conclusion. • Words like because or since signal premises. No reptiles have fur, and since all snakes are reptiles it follows that no snakes have fur Conclusion= No snakes have fur Eat your peas because they are good for you. Conclusion= You should eat your peas.

  4. Step 1: Identify the Conclusion The student did not do the homework, therefore he is lazy. Conclusion= Bill must be a basketball player because he is tall. Conclusion= You’re a vegetarian? You do realize that Hitler was a vegetarian, too? Conclusion= Dan White ate a lot of Twinkies and then killed the Mayor of San Francisco. If I were a mayor, I’d ban Twinkies so no one would kill me. Conclusion=

  5. Step 1: Identify the Conclusion The student did not do the homework, therefore he is lazy. Conclusion= He is lazy Bill must be a basketball player because he is tall. Conclusion= Basketball players are tall You’re a vegetarian? You do realize that Hitler was a vegetarian, too? Conclusion= You shouldn’t be a vegetarian Dan White ate a lot of Twinkies and then killed the Mayor of San Francisco. If I were a mayor, I’d ban Twinkies so no one would kill me. Conclusion= Twinkies cause people to commit murder.

  6. Identify the Conclusion MA Men are statistically more aggressive than I women.  Therefore, I, a male, must be more aggressive than you, a female.

  7. Fill in the Argument Form and Syllogism M A Men are statistically more aggressive than I women.  Therefore, I, a male, must be more aggressive than you, a female.

  8. Breaking Down the Argument Step 1: Identify the conclusion Step 2: Identify the Major and Minor premises Step 3: Identify the implied premises

  9. Step 2: Identify the premises. • The majorpremise is the claim that contains the predicate of the conclusion (the verb and ending) M A Men are statistically more aggressive than women. Therefore, I I, a male, must be more aggressive than you, a female

  10. Step 2: Identify the premises. • The minor premise is the claim that contains the subject of the conclusion (the “doer” of the verb) M A Menare statistically more aggressive than women. Therefore, I I, a male, must be more aggressive than you, a female.

  11. Fill in the Argument Form and Syllogism MA Men are statistically more aggressive than I women.  Therefore, I, a male, must be more aggressive than you, a female.

  12. What’s the conclusion? If those protesters really loved their country, then they wouldn’t question their government.

  13. What’s the Major Premise? P L If those protesters really loved their country, they wouldn’t question their government. Q

  14. What’s the Minor Premise? P L If those protesters really loved their country, they wouldn’t question their government. Q

  15. P L If those protesters really loved their country, they wouldn’t question their government. Q

  16. Complete the Chart Below Coal does not exist in infinite supply because it is a non-renewable resource.

  17. Fill in the Argument Form and Syllogism C E Coal does not exist in infinite supply because it is a non-renewable resource. N

  18. Fill in the Argument Form and Syllogism C E Coal does not exist in infinite supply because it is a non-renewable resource. N

More Related