1 / 20

Civil Rights Cases and Legislation Involving the 14 th Amendment

Civil Rights Cases and Legislation Involving the 14 th Amendment. (Begin with prejudice questionnaire). The Equal Protection Clause.

emmy
Télécharger la présentation

Civil Rights Cases and Legislation Involving the 14 th Amendment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Civil Rights Cases and Legislation Involving the 14th Amendment (Begin with prejudice questionnaire)

  2. The Equal Protection Clause • “No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law; nor deny to any person within it’s jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”

  3. Imagine… this was your beginning. Slave prison: San Sebastian

  4. Historical struggles of African Americans: Dred Scott v. Sanford 1857 The case was battling the complex issue of slavery. Scott wanted his freedom, yet in 1857 Taney & court ruled legal in all territories Slaves are “property”

  5. The Significance of the Dred Scott case

  6. Historical Struggles of African Americans: Plessy v. Ferguson (1890) An 1890 Louisiana law made railroads provide “equal but separate accommodations” Homer Plessy violated and it went to the SC In case, separate but equal was est.

  7. The significance of Plessy v. Ferguson

  8. Historical Struggles of African Americans • Brown v. Board of Education (1954) has been the most monumental case for ALL civil rights. • Linda Brown wanted to go to school closer to home • A case was brought combined with other similar ones against Topeka S.D. • The NAACP fought for Brown

  9. (DVD, if time) The Struggle for African Americans • Thurgood Marshall and team argued in front of SC • The court ruled in 1954 unanimously that in the field of public education, “separate but equal has no place” This case, under the Warren Court served as a beginning to govt. support! “Doll Test”

  10. 1947: Mendez v. Westminster • Click link above: 8 min.

  11. African Americans Win Gains • More legis. was passed in the years following • The 24th amendment made any tax related to the voting process illegal • Civil Rights Acts were passed in 64, 68, 91 • Some of these set up affirmative action

  12. What is it and can it be wrong? • Affirmative Action: programs for minorities supported by government as a means of providing equality • To “undo” the wrongs of past • Ex. forced hiring of minorities • Ex. accepting minority students over whites, regardless to qualification • Ex. “busing” • Ex. more funding for minorities from govt.

  13. U.C. Davis v. Bakke (1978) Alan Bakke: Guilty of being white? Claimed he was the victim of reverse discrimination Had been rejected from school twice even though test scores were higher! In 1978 the SC ruled school had violated his “equal protection”, but also ruled race canbe a factor!

  14. The Affirmative Action Debate • In the early 90’s legis. tried to empower the programs • The public was turning against it • 1991 law vetoed by Bush Sr., law softened • Clinton’s attitude: “mend it, not end it”

  15. Any other factors to consider?

  16. The Affirmative Action Debate The California State Board of Regents invalidated raceas a factor in admissions In 1996 California voters approved the Ca. Civil Rights Initiative (Prop 209)

  17. (Because minority enrollment decreased, California instituted a policy guaranteeing the top 10% of minority students applying!) The Affirmative Action Debate ?? It stated that race or gendercannot be taken into account in hiring.

  18. The Affirmative Action Debate: Adarand Constructors v Pena (1995) • The company Adarand Constructors took the Transportation Sec, Frederico Pena to court • Reason: laws in most states (incl. CO) allow for govt projects to give preference for work to be done by minority-owned businesses

  19. The Affirmative Action Debate Issue was even though his co. offered the same services for a lower price, the job went to a minority-owned business instead! Adarand claimed reverse discrimination under the 14th, court sided w/him, but…

  20. The debate rages on…

More Related