1 / 17

Computer-Mediated Communication

Computer-Mediated Communication. Collective Action and Public Goods II. Solutions to the Free-Rider Problem?. Selective Incentives Self-Interest. Types of Social Dilemmas. Different social dilemma games make different use of the payouts: T>R>P>S Prisoner’s Dilemma T>R>S>P Chicken

erica-oneil
Télécharger la présentation

Computer-Mediated Communication

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Computer-Mediated Communication Collective Action and Public Goods II

  2. Solutions to the Free-Rider Problem? • Selective Incentives • Self-Interest Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

  3. Types of Social Dilemmas Different social dilemma games make different use of the payouts: T>R>P>S Prisoner’s Dilemma T>R>S>P Chicken T>P>R>S Deadlock R>T>P>S Stag Hunt B 3 (R) 5 (T) 0 (S) Reward Temptation Sucker Punishment 3 (R) A 0 (S) 1 (P) 5 (T) 1 (P) Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

  4. Example: Chicken Game T>R>S>P Chicken Coop = Swerve Defect = Do Not Swerve B 3 (R) 5 (T) 1 (S) Reward Temptation Sucker Punishment 3 (R) A 1 (S) 0 (P) 5 (T) 0 (P) Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

  5. Life is “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short” (Hobbes 1651) Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

  6. Reconsidering the Free-Rider Problem Communality and Discretionary Databases “Second-Order” Communality Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

  7. Problem shift– Making private data publicMaintaining information privacy Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

  8. Collective Action and Group Size Smaller groups tend to have a better chance of producing a public good (Olson 1965) Why? • More benefits for each person • Larger impact of any single contribution • Generally, lower costs of organization Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

  9. But what about REALLY big groups? Analyzing and Visualizing the Semantic Coverage of Wikipedia and Its Authors (Holloway, Bozicevic and Borner 2005) http://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0512085 Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

  10. Self-Interest in Small versus Large Groups Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

  11. Fallacy of Individuals and Collectives See: Mancur Olson (1965)“The Logic of Collective Action” Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

  12. Online Collectives are Good! BAD!? Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

  13. Finding “Roles” in Online Collective Action Behaviors Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

  14. Structural similarity Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

  15. Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

  16. Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

  17. Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

More Related