1 / 18

Earning Inequality and Spatial Mismatch in Texas

Earning Inequality and Spatial Mismatch in Texas. Shujuan Li Geog 406 Instructor: Dr. Bednarz. Introduction. Earning Inequality “Earning inequality has increased markedly in the United States in recent decades” ----------- Bradbury, Kodrycki, and Mayer. Introduction.

ernst
Télécharger la présentation

Earning Inequality and Spatial Mismatch in Texas

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Earning Inequality and Spatial Mismatch in Texas Shujuan Li Geog 406 Instructor: Dr. Bednarz

  2. Introduction • Earning Inequality “Earning inequality has increased markedly in the United States in recent decades” ----------- Bradbury, Kodrycki, and Mayer

  3. Introduction • Economic segregation • Spatial Mismatch Studies “The spatial mismatch hypothesis states that housing discrimination confines blacks to living in a few central city neighborhoods, where jobs have become increasingly scarce because employers have relocated to the suburbs.” (Mayer,1996)

  4. Objectives • Earning Inequality in Texas • Spatial Characteristics of earning segregation • Spatial Mismatch?

  5. Data • Census 1990 • Census 2000

  6. Earning Inequality in Texas • Earning Inequality has been increasing in Texas since the late 1970s1 • Texas is among the nine states with highest levels of income inequality 2 • Only Texas and Louisiana were the two states keeping in the top ten from 1970s to today 3 • It was also among the only four states having a larger proportion of income going to the richest families. 3 [1] http://www.epinet.org/content.cfm/datazone_states_usmap_tx [2] http://www.cbpp.org/1-18-00sfp.htm [3] http://www.fiscalpolicy.org/pullingapart.htm

  7. Spatial Distribution of Household Incoming – Urban area VS rural area

  8. Spatial Distribution of Household Incoming -- Urban area VS rural area

  9. Spatial Distribution of Household Incoming -- Central Cities VS Suburban Areas

  10. Spatial Distribution of Household Incoming -- Central Cities VS Suburban Areas

  11. Spatial Distribution of Household Incoming -- Central Cities VS Suburban Areas

  12. Spatial Distribution of Household Incoming -- Central Cities VS Suburban Areas • There are obvious household incoming segregations between central cities and suburban areas. • From 1990 to 2000, the general spatial pattern of household incoming segregation in urban areas had been unchanged. • Segregation conditions in central cities did not change much, while area surrounding suburban area had obvious increase of household incoming.

  13. Spatial Mismatch?

  14. Spatial Mismatch? Unemployment Status for the Population 16+ Years

  15. Spatial Mismatch?

  16. Spatial Mismatch?

  17. Percentage of workers working in central city Spatial Mismatch?

  18. Conclusions • Texas has serious income inequality problem. • There are obvious and aggregate rural/ urban income segregation. • Change of income segregation in urban area is not very obvious. • Income segregation did affect job access of inner work forces in Houston area.

More Related