1 / 7

Project 37623 Energy Efficiency Rulemaking

Project 37623 Energy Efficiency Rulemaking. Comments from the REP Coalition June 30, 2010. Customer Cost Impact Estimate for Increased EE Goals Under June 3 Filing. * Includes both Performance Bonus and Hard-to-Reach Bonus.

eron
Télécharger la présentation

Project 37623 Energy Efficiency Rulemaking

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Project 37623Energy Efficiency Rulemaking Comments from the REP Coalition June 30, 2010

  2. Customer Cost Impact Estimate for Increased EE Goals Under June 3 Filing * Includes both Performance Bonus and Hard-to-Reach Bonus

  3. Customer Cost Impact Estimates Under June 3 Filing by Customer Class (in $000s)

  4. Applicable Volume Projections (GWh) 1 Weather-adjusted actual MWh for Residential and Commercial customers only, per EEPRs 2 Assumed growth rates from Itron Report, Table 3-21 (adjusted for apparent AEP-SWEPCO misplacement) 3 Assumed Residential % based on 2005-08 actual (non-weather adjusted) volumes reported in EEPRs and PUC data

  5. Customer Cost Impact Estimate Under June 3 Filing by Customer Class ($/MWh)

  6. Customer Impacts Should be Capped at $1/MWh for Residential and Commercial Customers • As proposed, the rule would provide a cap on utility budgets, exclusive of potential bonus payments • REPs prefer a cap on the total customer impact because it would: • Reduce the projected cost impact by nearly 40% that consumers would otherwise incur under the June 3 filing for the year 2014 • Provide greater transparency and rate certainty for retail customers, limiting customer confusion • Set a reasonable cost limit at the outset, allowing the Commission and stakeholders to evaluate through a measured approach how increases in efficiency goals can be effected, taking into account the impact the rate increase will have on retail customers

  7. Estimate of Cost Exposure with $1/MWh Cap

More Related