1 / 11

Absolute Impact Ages and Cratering as a Function of Time With contributions from

Absolute Impact Ages and Cratering as a Function of Time With contributions from Timothy D. Swindle Donald D. Bogard David A. Kring. K-Ar Geochronology Method. 40 K (half-life 1.3 Ga) decays to 40 Ca (89%) and 40 Ar (11%) – like sand through an hourglass.

ethan
Télécharger la présentation

Absolute Impact Ages and Cratering as a Function of Time With contributions from

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Absolute Impact Ages and Cratering as a Function of Time With contributions from Timothy D. Swindle Donald D. Bogard David A. Kring

  2. K-Ar Geochronology Method • 40K (half-life 1.3 Ga) decays to 40Ca (89%) and • 40Ar (11%) – like sand through an hourglass. • Rate proportional only to amount of 40K & T1/2 • Measure amount 40K remaining & 40Ar formed. • Decay Eq: ln (N / No) = e -λt • Age is: t = (1/λ) ln ((40Ar*/40K) (λ/λe) + 1) • where λ = ln 2 / T1/2 is the total decay constant and the sum of λe (decay of 40K to 40Ar) and λβ (decay of • 40K to 40Ca). 40K 40Ar, 40Ca

  3. Ar-Ar Geochronology Method • Irradiate a K-bearing sample with neutrons to produce 39Ar from 39K • (The nuclear reaction is 39K (n, p) 39Ar ) • 39Ar becomes a proxy for K & is located in same lattice site as 40Ar from 40K • Precisely measure with a mass spectrometer the Ar isotopic ratio, 40Ar/39Ar, eliminating the need to measure absolute concentrations of both K and Ar. • Age given by: t = (1/λ) ln ((40Ar*/39Ar) J + 1) • J is a factor calculated from standards of known age irradiated with unknown samples. Age, t, is thus calculated relative to a standard age. • The Ar-Ar method is more reliable than the K-Ar technique for most samples & is now almost exclusively used. It is also ideal for small samples (e.g., impact melts from the Moon and in meteorites). • Commonly degas & measure Ar from sample in increasing temperature steps to examine age in different lattice sites.

  4. Ar-Ar Geochronology Method • Some Issues: • Age of unknown sample only as accurate as age of standard sample. • Sample may have contained 40Ar at the timeof formation. Resolve with isochron plot of 40Ar/36Ar vs.39Ar/36Ar (shown here) or • 36Ar/40Ar vs.39Ar/40Ar. • Age is calculated from the slope • Inherited 40Ar is given by the intercept • Sample may have lost some 40Ar by diffusion out of grain surfaces. • Prior loss typically revealed in Ar released at lower extraction temperatures.

  5. Simple Example of an Ar-Ar Age Spectrum • Age ‘boxes’ in red, K/Ca ratio in blue, for each temperature step. • Slight prior diffusion loss of 40Ar at low-temperature. • Varying K/Ca ratios indicate different K-bearing “phases” with same K-Ar age. Low temperatures High temperatures Yamaguchi et al. (2001)

  6. Ar-Ar Geochronology Method (magmatic example) Step Heating Plateau ages of ~1375 Ma Low temperatures High temperatures Swindle & Olson (2004)

  7. Ar-Ar Geochronology Method (magmatic example) Step Heating Low-T phases lost Ar or were “degassed” and, thus, do not reflect age of crystallization. Low temperatures High temperatures Swindle & Olson (2004)

  8. Ar-Ar Geochronology Method (magmatic example) Step Heating The nuclear reaction may create a “recoil” effect that moves 39Ar from a K-rich phase into a high-Ca, low-K phase, in this case pyroxene, producing a fictitiously low age in the highest T steps. Low temperatures High temperatures Swindle & Olson (2004)

  9. Ar-Ar Geochronology Method (impact melt example) Plateau age of 3800-3900 Ma Degassing event <2000 Ma Swindle et al. (2009)

  10. An Example of the Method’s Application Apollo – The radiometric ages of rocks from the lunar highlands indicated the lunar crust had been thermally metamorphosed ~3.9 – 4.0 Ga. A large number of impact melts were also generated at the same time. This effect was seen in the Ar-Ar system (Turner et al., 1973) and the U-Pb system (Tera et al., 1974). It was also preserved in the more easily reset Rb-Sr system. (Data summary, left, from Bogard, 1995.) A severe period of bombardment was inferred. Bogard (1995)

  11. References D.D. Bogard (1995) Impact ages of meteorites: A synthesis. Meteoritics 30, 244-268. T.D. Swindle, C.E. Isachsen, J.R. Weirich, and D.A. Kring (2009) 40Ar-39Ar ages of H-chondrite impact melt breccias. Meteoritics Planet. Sci. 44, 747-762. T.D. Swindle and E.K. Olson (2004) 40Ar-39Ar studies of whole-rock nakhlites: Evidence for the timing of aqueous alteration on Mars. Meteoritics Planet. Sci. 39, 755-766. F. Tera, D.A. Papanastassiou, and G.J. Wasserburg (1974) Isotopic evidence for a terminal lunar cataclysm. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 22, 1-21. G. Turner, P.H. Cadogan, and C.J. Yonge (1973) Argon selenochronology. Proc. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf. 4th, 1889-1914. A. Yamaguchi, G.J. Taylor, K. Keil, C. Floss, G. Crozaz, L.E. Nyquist, D.D. Bogard, D.H. Garrison, Y.D. Reese, H. Wiesmann, and C.Y. Shih (2001) Post-crystallization reheating and partial melting of eucrite EET90020 by impact into the hot crust of asteroid 4Vesta 4.50 Ga ago. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 65, 3577-3599.

More Related