1 / 49

From Vibrations to Rotations as a Function of Spin

From Vibrations to Rotations as a Function of Spin. Paddy Regan Dept. of Physics, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, UK e-mail: p.regan@surrey.ac.uk. Outline. Main physics question, Are nuclei (with Z=40-50) Rotators or Vibrators ?

thelma
Télécharger la présentation

From Vibrations to Rotations as a Function of Spin

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. From Vibrations to Rotations as a Function of Spin Paddy Regan Dept. of Physics, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, UK e-mail: p.regan@surrey.ac.uk

  2. Outline Main physics question, Are nuclei (with Z=40-50) Rotators or Vibrators ? * Signatures of vibrator-rotor structural evolution. * 102Ru from WNSL-Yale * 99-102Mo alignments/phase changes (using DICs). * 112,114Cd medium spins from WNSL-Yale * Odd-A cases, 101Ru

  3. Nuclear Rotations and Vibrations • What are the signatures (in even-even nuclei) ? • (extreme) theoretical limits

  4. En n=3 n=2 n=1 n=0 b2 V http://npl.kyy.nitech.ac.jp/~arita/vib b2

  5. Signatures of (perfect) vibrators and rotors State lifetimes, i.e., B(E2) values and selection rules (eg. Dn=1).

  6. Nuclei in the Sr-Sn region show dramatic change in structure around N~60. Sudden explosion of b2 deformation in Sr-Ru isotopes at N=60 has been explained by strong spatial overlap of Spin-Orbit Partners (SOPs) g9/2 protons and g7/2 neutrons. (see Federman and Pittel, Phys. Rev. C20 (1979) p820)

  7. Alignments and rotational motion in ‘vibrational’ 106Cd (Z=48, N=58), PHR et al. Nucl. Phys. A586 (1995) p351

  8. Can subtract off a reference (core) aligned angular momentum to see effect of quasi-particle alignments as a function of frequency. Dix=5h CSM ref. Bengtsson Frauendorf and May, At. Data. Nuc. Data. Tab. 35 (1986) p15

  9. h11/2 neutron orbital responsible for 1st crossing in even-even systems. Energy appears to correlate with transition to deformed ground states at N~60

  10. 82 1h11/2 50 [550]1/2- 1g9/2 Alignment (rotational picture at least) driven by Coriolis interaction on high-j, low-W orbitals (ie. ones with large jx on collective rotation axis. Vcor = -jx.w eg. nh11/2 [550]1/2 ‘intruder’ FS for N~57, b2~0.15->0.2 jx [541]3/2-

  11. Ru (Z=44) in the centre of the ‘deformed’ region for N=56-58 Anharmonic vibrator for the ground state ‘band’ is the usual explanation for 100Ru and neighbours....but mid-shell (Z=40-50) nature is consistent with largest collectivity in the region. Q.Are these nuclei deformed or vibrational ? Zr Mo Ru Pd Cd Sn

  12. Experimental Details 96Zr (9Be,3n)102Ru, space~100mb Enriched (85%) 670mg/cm296Zr foil on 5mg/cm2natPb support. Ebeam=44 MeV, lmax~25 h YRASTBALL array at WNSL 6 clover germaniums @ 90o 5 co-axial detectors @ 50o + 126o 3 co-axial detectors @ 160o

  13. See PHR, Beausang, Zamfir, Casten, Zhang, Yamamoto et al., PRL in press.

  14. If we parameterize with (Eg / J) vs. J Can see if rotor or vibrator by inspection

  15. Structural change from vibrator to rotator appears to be a regular feature of this region. Rotation stabilized by core stiffening due to population of ‘rotation-aligned’ h11/2 neutrons. Special type of crossing, Vibrator to Rotor !!!

  16. Q. Are backbends necessarily due to rotational alignment ? A. NO ! Can be vibrational – rotational structure change!!

  17. Detailed spectroscopy allowed by investigating gamma-decay sequences from high-spin states. YRASTBALL allows triple coincidences to be routinely observed. Band-like structures are clearly observed in 101Ru. (a) gamma-gamma (b) triple coincidences

  18. Decay scheme for 101Ru Band-like sequences observed on ‘intrinsic’ 11/2-, 5/2+ and 7/2+ states. Backbending observed in positive parity bands (1 and 2), but not in negative parity band (band 3). Pauli blocking arguments suggest aligning particles are therefore of h11/2 neutron nature. see A.D.Yamamoto et al. Phys. Rev. C66 (2002) 024302

  19. Quasi-particle alignments and kinematic moments of inertia nh11/2 band Dix=10 nh11/2 band

  20. TRS calculations for 101Ru by Furong Xu (Bejing) for different parity (and signature) configs. g b2 w=0.2MeV w=0.3MeV w=0.4MeV w=0.6MeV

  21. See PHR, Yamamoto, Beausang, Zamfir, Casten, Zhang et al., AIP Conf. Proc. 656 (2002) p422

  22. For Odd-A (Carl Wheldon’s idea)

  23. (iii) (ii) (i) Ebeam ~15-20% above Coulomb barrier beam target Z N Can not use fusion-evaporation reactions to study high-spin states (and thus vibrational-rotational transitions, alignments etc.) in beta-stable and neutron-rich systems. Use deep-inelastic reactions.

  24. Kinematics and angular mom. input calcs (assumes ‘rolling mode’) for 136Xe beam on 100Mo target. Estimate ~ 25hbar in TLF for ~25% above Coul. barrier. For Eb(136Xe)~750 MeV, qblf~30o and qtlf~50o. 100Mo +136Xe (beam) DIC calcs.

  25. 100Mo + 136Xe @ 750 MeV GAMMASPHERE + CHICO BLFs TLFs elastics

  26. z x q1 q2 f1 f2 y

  27. Isomer gating very useful in DIC experiments. Test with known case…..

  28. Use known delayed lines in 101Mo (182 and 57 keV) to identify previously unknown nh11/2 band (+ 34 keV E1 decay).

  29. 112Cd

  30. Vib. rotor

  31. (ph11/2)2 alignment in A~130 region appears to have analogous behaviour to (nh11/2)2 alignment in A~100 region. Conclusion? In many cases, ‘rotational alignment’ is actually a crossing between a quasi-vibrational ground state configuration and a deformed rotational sequence caused by stiffening of potential by population of high-j, equatorial (h11/2) orbitals

  32. Summary and Future Look • 101,102Ru (and neighbours) look like g-soft, anharmonic vib. nuclei at low-spins (eg. E(4+)/E(2+)~2.3)..... BUT also have apparent rotational-like behaviour eg. band-crossing, alignments etc. • Paradoxically, Coriolis (rotational) effects are largest in nuclei which have SMALL deformations (ie. require large energies/frequencies to rotate). ‘Vibrational’ A=100 may be the best tests of nuclear Coriolis effects. • Vibrational – Rotational ‘phase’ change around spin 10? Smooth evolution with crossing of anharmonic vibrational states and rotation-aligned configurations. • Plot of Eg /J verses J gives model independent crossing.

  33. many thanks to...... • Arata Yamamoto (Surrey/Yale student). • 101-102Ru Expt. Con Beausang (+ Yalies) • 100Mo+136Xe CHICO, Rochester (Chin-Yen Wu et al.,), Manc. (John Smith et al,) + LBNL • 7Li+110Pd, Scott Langdown (+Yalies + Paisley) • Vibrator-Rotator (E-GOS) plots, Con B., Rick Casten, Victor Zamfir, Jing-Ye Zhang et al., • Odd-A, Carl Wheldon (now at GSI)

  34. NUSTAR’05International Conference onNUclear STructure, Astrophysics and Reactions The University of Surrey, Guildford, UK9-12 January 2005

More Related