Review of Level 3 Programmes: Quality Assurance Insights and Suggestions
This document reviews the Level 3 programmes offered by Co. Cavan VEC in accordance with their Quality Assurance Policy. The focus is on the Certificates of General Learning, Employability Skills, and ICT, with overall positive feedback on layout and structure. However, it identifies areas for improvement including indicative content amendments, assessment clarity, and the appropriate level of material. Key suggestions for programme enhancement are discussed, emphasizing the importance of aligning content with learning outcomes and specific assessments. Annual reviews will be conducted for continued improvement.
Review of Level 3 Programmes: Quality Assurance Insights and Suggestions
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Quality Assurance • These programmes need to be reviewed according to Co. Cavan VEC’s Quality Assurance Policy: • B5 Programme development, delivery and review • B9 - Self-evaluation
What we are reviewing Our 3 Level 3 programmes: • Certificate of General Learning (Everyday Learning Skills) • Certificate in Employability Skills (Skills for Employment) • Certificate in ICT (Skills for ICT)
General • Overall, comments were positive. • There seemed to be no difficulties in the layout and structure of the programmes. • Some indicative content and assessment will be amended according to comments and suggestions.
Application of number • Suggestions to add a few points to the indicative content
Art and Design • A section on presenting work – Level 4/5 standard • Too many finished pieces required
Breakfast Cookery • Evidencing some of the skills demonstrations was difficult • A lot of content for only 5 credits
Career Preparation • Difficult to source materials for the course • Too difficult for many Youthreach learners • Perhaps too much to cover
Communications • Suggestions to remove some of the indicative content, e.g. the personal letter • Interpersonal communication needs reworking with not as much having to be covered, clearer
Computer Literacy • Some tutors unsure of 3rd skills demonstration, more clarification needed • Too much theory
ESOL • Too many reading pieces • Insufficient emphasis on writing
Horticulture • No issues!
Hairdressing Basin Skills • No issues!
Internet Skills • Too theory based • Some discrepancies between indicative content and specific assessment
Mathematics • Possibly too much information in the indicative content, difficult for learners to complete the component due to the amount of work that needs to be covered
Managing Personal Finances • Details such as APR difficult for the learner
Personal Care and Presentation • Hair washing procedure should be a skills demonstration not collection of work, but FETAC have stated 100% portfolio
Personal Effectiveness • Some assessments too vague
Woodwork • No issues!
Word processing • Some indicative content too detailed • Some important aspects left out
Just a reminder…. • Indicative content – ‘indicative’ – it’s a sign of what you should be covering • All learning outcomes must be covered • All specific assessment must be covered • Sometimes learning outcomes are repeated or they overlap, integrate where possible
To sum up.. • Indicative content – match this content to your learning outcomes • If it states ‘to include’ – you should cover all, if it states ‘for example’ – choose the most appropriate examples • Check the specific assessment • …….then you are ready to start writing your assessment briefs….
Thanks! • Thanks to all tutors who gave very valuable comments and suggestions.
Groups • Woodwork – Damien O’Brien, Brian McIntrye, Patsy McIntyre • Breakfast cookery –Mary Cochrane, Angela McEntee, Derek Quinn • Computer Literacy – Jason Smith, Mairead Mulligan, Charlotte Dunne, Patricia Martin • Career Preparation – Sean Corcoran, Grainne Smith • Communications – Anne Brady, Mary McKenna, Clara McCabe • ESOL – ZuzannaGorska, Fiachra Keogh, Michael Donohoe • Internet skills - Tomas Brides, Margaret Brady, Chris Kirk, Anita McKenna, Colette McBrien • Maths – Margaret O’Reilly, Conal Clarke, Michael Murphy • Join any group that suits: Karen Fitzsimons, Marie Reilly, Caroline Clarke, Siobhan Duffy and any others!
TASK • Read the feedback. • Refer to the programme and specific component. • Decide if you agree / disagree. • Offer suggestions. • Record your comments.
On-going Review Co. Cavan VEC will review all programmes annually. Remember, to make notes of things that are difficult to deliver. If you have any queries, please email me: jannatiearney@calc.ie