1 / 36

Dr. R. Nagarajan Professor Dept of Chemical Engineering IIT Madras

Advanced Transport Phenomena Module 5 Lecture 23. Energy Transport: Radiation & Illustrative Problems. Dr. R. Nagarajan Professor Dept of Chemical Engineering IIT Madras. RADIATION. Plays an important role in: e.g., furnace energy transfer (kilns, boilers, etc.), combustion

ewa
Télécharger la présentation

Dr. R. Nagarajan Professor Dept of Chemical Engineering IIT Madras

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Advanced Transport Phenomena Module 5 Lecture 23 Energy Transport: Radiation& Illustrative Problems Dr. R. Nagarajan Professor Dept of Chemical Engineering IIT Madras

  2. RADIATION • Plays an important role in: • e.g., furnace energy transfer (kilns, boilers, etc.), combustion • Primary sources in combustion • Hot solid confining surfaces • Suspended particulate matter (soot, fly-ash) • Polyatomic gaseous molecules • Excited molecular fragments

  3. RADIATION EMISSION FROM & EXCHANGE BETWEEN OPAQUE SOLID SURFACES • Maximum possible rate of radiation emission from each unit area of opaque surface at temperature Tw (in K): (Stefan-Boltzmann “black-body” radiation law) • Radiation distributed over all directions & wavelengths (Planck distribution function) • Maximum occurs at wavelength (Wein “displacement law”)

  4. RADIATION EMISSION FROM & EXCHANGE BETWEEN OPAQUE SOLID SURFACES

  5. RADIATION EMISSION FROM & EXCHANGE BETWEEN OPAQUE SOLID SURFACES Approximate temperature dependencea of Total Radiant-Energy Flux from Heated Solid surfaces a

  6. RADIATION EMISSION FROM & EXCHANGE BETWEEN OPAQUE SOLID SURFACES e w (T w) = fraction of Dependence of total “hemispheric emittance” on surface temperature of several refractory material (log-log scale)

  7. RADIATION EMISSION FROM & EXCHANGE BETWEEN OPAQUE SOLID SURFACES • Two surfaces of area Ai & Aj separated by an IR-transparent gas exchange radiation at a net rate given by: • Fij grey-body view factor • Accounts for • area j seeing only a portion of radiation from i, and vice versa • neither emitting at maximum (black-body) rate • area j reflecting some incident energy back to i, and vice versa

  8. RADIATION EMISSION FROM & EXCHANGE BETWEEN OPAQUE SOLID SURFACES • Isothermal emitter of area Aw in a partial enclosure of temperature Tenclosure filled with IR-transparent moving gas: • Surface loses energy by convection at average flux: • Total net average heat flux from surface = algebraic sum of these

  9. RADIATION EMISSION FROM & EXCHANGE BETWEEN OPAQUE SOLID SURFACES • Thus, radiation contributes the following additive term to convective htc: • In general: • Radiation contribution important in high-temperature systems, and in low-convection (e.g., natural) systems

  10. RADIATION EMISSION & TRANSMISSION BY DISPERSED PARTICULATE MATTER • Laws of emission from dense clouds of small particles complicated by particles usually being: • Small compared to lmax • Not opaque • At temperatures different from local host gas • When cloud is so dense that the photon mean-free-path, lphoton << macroscopic lengths of interest: • Radiation can be approximated as diffusion process (Roesseland optically-thick limit)

  11. RADIATION EMISSION & TRANSMISSION BY DISPERSED PARTICULATE MATTER • For pseudo-homogeneous system, this leads to an additive (photon) contribution to thermal conductivity: • neff  effective refractive index of medium • Physical situation similar to augmentation in a high-temperature packed bed

  12. RADIATION EMISSION & TRANSMISSION BY IR-ACTIVE VAPORS • Isothermal, hemispherical gas-filled dome of radius Lrad contributes incident flux (irradiation): to unit area centered at its base, where Total emissivity of gas mixture  eg(X1, X2, …, Tg) • Can be determined from direct overall energy-transfer experiments

  13. RADIATION EMISSION & TRANSMISSION BY IR-ACTIVE VAPORS

  14. RADIATION EMISSION & TRANSMISSION BY IR-ACTIVE VAPORS • More generally (when gas viewed by surface element is neither hemispherical nor isothermal): (for special case of one dominant emitting species i) Tg (q, f, Xi) temperature in gas at position defined by q  angle measured from normal, andf ∫0dXi optical depth

  15. RADIATION EMISSION & TRANSMISSION BY IR-ACTIVE VAPORS • Integrating over solid angles : (piLrad)eff  effective optical depth Leff  equivalent dome radius for particular gas configuration seen by surface area element • Equals cylinder diameter for very long cylinders containing isothermal, radiating gas

  16. RADIATION IN HIGH-TEMPERATURE CHEMICAL REACTORS • Coupled radiation- convection- conduction energy transport modeled by 3 approaches: • Net interchange via action-at-a-distance method • Yields integro-differential equations, numerically cumbersome • Six-flux (differential) model of net radiation transfer • Leads to system of PDEs, hence preferred • Monte-Carlo calculations of photon-bundle histories • PDE solved by finite-difference methods

  17. RADIATION IN HIGH-TEMPERATURE CHEMICAL REACTORS • Net interchange via action-at-a-distance method: • Net radiant interchange considered between distant Eulerian control volumes of gas • Each volume interacts with all other volumes • Extent depends on absorption & scattering of radiation along relevant intervening paths

  18. RADIATION IN HIGH-TEMPERATURE CHEMICAL REACTORS • Six-flux (differential) model of net radiation transfer method: • Radiation field represented by six fluxes at each point in space:

  19. RADIATION IN HIGH-TEMPERATURE CHEMICAL REACTORS • In each direction, flux assumed to change according to local emission (coefficient ) and absorption () plus scattering (): • (five similar first-order PDEs for remaining fluxes) • Six PDEs solved, subject to BC’s at combustor walls

  20. RADIATION IN HIGH-TEMPERATURE CHEMICAL REACTORS • Monte-Carlo calculations of photon-bundle histories: • Histories generated on basis of known statistical laws of photon interaction (absorption, scattering, etc.) with gases & surfaces • Progress computed of large numbers of “photon bundles” • Each contains same amount of energy • Wall-energy fluxes inferred by counting photon-bundle arrivals in areas of interest • Computations terminated when convergence is achieved

  21. PROBLEM 1 A manufacturer/supplier of fibrous 90% Al2O3- 10% SiO2 insulation board (0.5 inches thick, 70% open porosity) does not provide direct information about its thermal conductivity, but does report hot- and cold-face temperatures when it is placed in a vertical position in 800F still air, heated from one side and “clad” with a thermocouple-carrying thin stainless steel plate (of total hemispheric emittance 0.90) on the “cold” side.

  22. PROBLEM 1 • a. Given the following table of hot- and cold-face temperatures for an 18’’ high specimen, estimate its thermal conductivity (when the pores are filled with air at 1 atm). (Express your result in (BTU/ft2-s)/(0F/in) and (W/m.K) and itemize your basic assumptions.) • b. Estimate the “R” value of this insulation at a nominal temperature of 10000F in air at 1 atm. • If this insulation were used under vacuum conditions, would its thermal resistance increase, decrease, or remain the same? (Discuss)

  23. PROBLEM 1

  24. SOLUTION 1 The manufacturer of the insulation reports Th , Tw –combinations for the configuration shown in Figure. What is the k and the “R” –value (thermal resistance) of their insulation? We consider here the intermediate case: and carry out all calculations in metric units.

  25. SOLUTION 1 Note: Then: and

  26. SOLUTION 1 Radiation Flux or Inserting

  27. SOLUTION 1 Natural Convection Flux: Vertical Flat Plate But: and, for a perfect gas: Therefore

  28. SOLUTION 1 For air: and Therefore

  29. SOLUTION 1 and Therefore This is in the laminar BL range Now,

  30. SOLUTION 1 And Since L

  31. SOLUTION 1 Therefore

  32. SOLUTION 1 Conclusion When

  33. SOLUTION 1 Therefore or Therefore, for the thermal “resistance,” R:

  34. SOLUTION 1 Remark (one of the common English units) at

  35. SOLUTION 1 Student Exercises 1. Calculate for the other pairs of is the resulting dependence of reasonable? 2. How does compare to the value for “rock-wool” insulation? 3. Would this insulation behave differently under vacuum conditions?

More Related