1 / 62

Projecting points onto a point cloud with noise

Projecting points onto a point cloud with noise. Speaker: Jun Chen Mar 26, 2008. Data Acquisition. Point clouds. 25893. Point clouds. 56194. topological. Unorganized, connectivity-free. Surface Reconstruction. Noise. Definition of “onto”. Close? Which?. Applications. Rendering

Télécharger la présentation

Projecting points onto a point cloud with noise

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Projecting points onto a point cloud with noise Speaker: Jun Chen Mar 26, 2008

  2. Data Acquisition

  3. Point clouds 25893

  4. Point clouds 56194

  5. topological Unorganized, connectivity-free

  6. Surface Reconstruction

  7. Noise

  8. Definition of “onto” Close? Which?

  9. Applications • Rendering • Parameterization • Simplification • Reconstruction • Area computation

  10. References An extension on robust directed projection of points onto point clouds Ming-Cui Du, Yu-Shen Liu(CAD, In press) Parameterization-free Projection for Geometry Reconstruction Yaron Lipman, Daniel Cohen-Or, David Levin, Hillel Tal-Ezer (SIGGRAPH ’07)

  11. An extension on robust directed projection of points onto point clouds Ming-Cui Du, Yu-Shen Liu CAD, In press

  12. About the author (刘玉身) • Postdoctor of Purdue University, Ph.D. in Tsinghua University. • 3 CAD, 1 The Visual Computer. • CAD, DGP .

  13. Result

  14. Previous work Parameterization of clouds of unorganized points using dynamic base surfaces (CAD, 04) Drawing curves onto a cloud of points for point-based Modeling (CAD, 05) Automatic least-squares projection of points onto point clouds with applications in reverse engineering (CAD, 06)

  15. Weighted squared distances error

  16. Weighted squared distances error

  17. Proposition Terminating criterion: Simple, direct

  18. Error analysis (Robustness) True location Independent of the cloud of points

  19. Improved weight distance between pm and the axis stability

  20. Improved weight

  21. Reduce cloud • Setting the threshold: • 1.

  22. Reduce cloud • Setting the threshold: • 1. • 2. Sort the weights in a decreasing order, then choose the nth weight as threshold. (n=N/100).

  23. References • Robust diagnostic regression analysis. Atkinson A, Riani M. (Springer;2000) • Robust Moving Least-squares Fitting with Sharp Features Shachar Fleishman, Daniel Cohen-Or, Claudio T. Silva (SIGGRAPH ’05)

  24. Forward vs. backward • Backward: Start from the entire sample set, then delete bad samples. • Forward: Begins witha small outlier-free subset, then refining byadding one goodsample at a time. (robust) • Adding of multiple points.

  25. Algorithm • 1. Choose a small outlier-free subset Q. • 2. The solution is computed to the current subset Q. • 3. The point with the lowest residual in the remaining points is added into Q. (Forward) • 4. Repeat steps 2 and 3 until the error is larger than a predefined threshold. • 5. Compute the projection position for the final Q.

  26. Least median of squares

  27. LMS algorithm

  28. Random sampling algorithm

  29. Robustness • P: Probability of success. • g: Probability of selecting good sample. • k: Number of points are selected at random. (k = p) • T: Number of iteration. (T = 1000)

  30. Forward search

  31. Disturbing points

  32. Disturbing points

  33. Limitations

  34. Limitations Use the first quartile (25%) instead of the median (50%)

  35. Parameterization-free Projection for Geometry Reconstruction Yaron Lipman, Daniel Cohen-Or, David Levin, Hillel Tal-Ezer (SIGGRAPH ’07)

  36. About the author (Yaron Lipman) • Ph.D. student at Tel-Aviv University. His supervisors are Prof. David Levin and Prof. Daniel Cohen-Or. • SIGGRAPH, TOG, EG, SGP

  37. About the author (Daniel Cohen-Or) • Professor at the School of Computer Science, Tel Aviv University. • Outstanding Technical Contributions Award 2005(EG) • TOG(19), CGF,TVCG, SGP, VC

  38. About the author (David Levin) • Professor of Applied Mathematics, Tel-Aviv University. • Major interests: • Subdivision • Moving Least Squares • Numerical Integration • CAGD • Computer Graphics

  39. About the author (David Levin) • Professor of Applied Mathematics, Tel-Aviv University. • Major interests: • Subdivision • Moving Least Squares • Numerical Integration • CAGD • Computer Graphics

  40. Results

  41. Locally Optimal Projection (LOP) θ(r), η(r)are fast decreasing functions.

  42. Regularization

  43. Multivariate L1 median

  44. Optimization

  45. Optimization

More Related