1 / 22

PMA 208 Industry Day

PMA 208 Industry Day. Agenda. Opening Remarks CAPT Walter Program Overview Dave Williams PMA 208 Supersonic Targets Threat D Technical Constraints TAAS Acquisition Activities Funding RFI Considerations Points of Contact Q&A.

faith-bentley
Télécharger la présentation

PMA 208 Industry Day

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. PMA 208 Industry Day

  2. Agenda • Opening Remarks CAPT Walter • Program Overview Dave Williams • PMA 208 • Supersonic Targets • Threat D • Technical Constraints • TAAS • Acquisition Activities • Funding • RFI Considerations • Points of Contact • Q&A

  3. Improve Industry’s understanding of the Navy’s requirement. Help Navy understand Industry’s capabilities. Industry approaches to provide capability. Price information. Schedule information. Purpose of RFI

  4. TDWG stood up by OSD AT&L Defense Systems, Operational Test and Evaluation, and the Navy will establish a Threat D Target Working Group to explore the area of target availability and present alternatives to the Overarching Integrated Product Team (OIPT) by January 2005 DOD/Navy Interest in Threat D

  5. OSD AT&L tasking to DSB (22 Oct 2004) “Alternatives for replication of supersonic, sea-skimming threats, such as Threat D.” DOD/Navy Interest in Threat D

  6. DOT&E Line in the sand Dec 2001 Memo to ASN(RD&A) “threat representative (Including Threat D) ASCM targets must be available” March 2002 Memo to SECNAV Concerns that budget does not contain funding for Threat D target. DOD/Navy Interest in Threat D

  7. What’s possible. What’s it going to cost. What’s the required schedule to field a solution. Help Needed

  8. BQM-74F Aerial Targets and DecoysPMA-208 Product Line Subsonic Supersonic Miscellaneous SSST QLT-1C BQM-34S AQM-37 Common TA/AS MQM-8G/ VANDAL Decoys Threat Simulation BQM-74E MA-31 TALD TDU-32 ARME SNTC GQM-163A ITALD ARME

  9. Operating Sites

  10. Operational RequirementsSupersonic Sea-Skimming Targets (SSST) • SSST ORD (#505-86-98) identifies requirements to replicate a family of ASCM Threats called Threats A, B, C and D • Threat A:Currently fielded and exported. • Vandal (Out of Production) • Converted TALOS missile • Orbital Sciences Corporation supporting operations • Threat B. Currently fielded and exported. • MA-31 • Boeing Corporation (Integration/Support Operations) • Threat C : Never entered production. • GQM-163 represents Threat A, B and C • GQM-163 finishing development (DT phase) • Orbital Sciences Corporation (Production/Support Operations) • Threat D : Currently fielded and exported. • Currently no representative target. • Capabilities Development Document (CDD) in Draft

  11. Supersonic High Altitude/TBM Profile Targets • AQM-37 • Medium to high altitude supersonic cruise with dive • Mach 2.0 – 4.0 • Range 100 mi • Altitude 1000ft – 100Kft • Demonstrated TBM profiles (300Kft, 120 nmi downrange) • Out of Production since Dec 01 • Raytheon Corporation • T&E and FMS use • Govt Operational & Logistic Support FY02 OPS & Expenditures - 21 FY03 OPS & Expenditures – 15 FY04 OPS & Expenditures - 11 FY05 OPS & Expenditures -11

  12. Limited inventory Inventory depletion now projected in FY05 Contractor Operational & Logistic Support MQM-8G ER/EER (Vandal)Converted Talos Missiles: Orbital Sciences Inc. FY02 OPS & Expenditures – 10 FY03 OPS & Expenditures – 10 FY04 OPS & Expenditures - 3 FY05 OPS & Expenditures - 5

  13. Acquisition Approach to Meet Threat A,B, & C Two Solutions Being Pursued • MA-31 • Produced by Boeing from Russian Kh-31 missile • Available for fleet use in calendar year 2006 • Adding F-16 launch capability • Contractor Logistic Support • Government assist Operational Support • GQM-163 • In EMD with Orbital Sciences Corporation • Successful EMD-1/2/3 • MS III scheduled 3rd qtr FY05 • Available for fleet use 2005 • Contractor Logistic Support • Government assist Operational Support

  14. 3M-54E 2 1a 6 4 5 3 1b 1) Launch from a) ship or b) submarine. 2) Solid booster separation. 3) Cruise at Mach 0.53-0.70, 20 meter altitude. 4) Ascend to extend radar horizon, search for target, detection range up to 65 km. 5) Descend, subsonic cruise toward target. 6) Combat stage separation 20 km from target, spent bus falls away, Combat stage accelerates up to Mach 3 at 5-10 m altitude.

  15. Range (NM) – 35 min cruise (108 desired)/11 min (terminal) Speed (mach) – 0.7 min cruise/ acc to 2.8 min terminal Altitude (feet absolute) – 50 cruise/16 terminal Terminal Maneuvers (g’s) – 6.5 min (+15 desired) Payload – RF/ECM/ECCM, range safety Body length (ft) – 28 max (total Sprint + Cruise w/o booster) Diameter (ft) – 1.7 max Wingspan (ft) – 9.9 max Endpoint accuracy (ft) - +/- 100 (moving endpoint) Integrate in current Navy Ranges Shipping commensurate with standard commercial shipping by land , air, and sea Technical Constraints

  16. Flight Termination System Radar Tracking Transponder Scoring System EA/EW Threat System Data Telemetry System RCC-319 Compliant (Dual / Redundant Command Destruct Receivers) G or I–Band Beacon (GFE) (AN/DPN-90) Scalar/Vector Scorer (GFE) (AN/DSQ-50A / VDOPS) Threat Simulator (GFE) (AN/ULQ-21, AN/DPT-2) Telemetry Transmitter (Navigation, Flight Data, Scoring Telemetry) Target Auxiliary/Augmentation Systems AN/DPN-90 AN/DSQ-50A

  17. Acquisition Strategy in development Multiple approaches being considered Domestic hybrid approach Foreign Material Acquisition Other? Threat Representative target needed in FY-10 FY06 Milestone B decision FY06 Contract award Average 10 presentations per year Threat D Acquisition Activities

  18. Funding FY06 FY07 FY08 RDT&E 10.5M 22.9M 10.6M Requirement for SM-6 OT, FY10

  19. Design Approach for Target Address Critical Areas Vehicle Separation Acceleration to Supersonic Flight Concept of Operations Include Buildup, Test, Launch, Mission Profile, Propulsion, Navigation/Guidance, Termination Demonstrated Target/Missile Systems Design, Integration, Test, & Manufacturing Capability Engineering Information

  20. Logistics/Supportability • Demonstrated Logistics Capability • Maintenance Concept • Data Management and Depository Concepts • Supply Support Concept • Package, Handling, Storage & Transportation Concepts • Test and Support Equipment Concept

  21. Points of Contact Dawyn Johnson Contracts (301) 757-5896 Dawyn.Johnson@navy.mil David Williams Project Lead (301) 757-6109 David.T.Williams@navy.mil WEBSITE: http://www.navair.navy.mil/pma208/

  22. Questions & Answers

More Related