1 / 10

Faculty Development Needs Assessment: Report on Findings

Faculty Development Needs Assessment: Report on Findings. Institution: AIEP – Universidad Andrés Bello Response to Final Survey. Project Staff Carmen (Lizy) Lamboy, Ed.D. Director Faculty Development January, 2009 Laureate Higher Education Group Network Products and Service

fancy
Télécharger la présentation

Faculty Development Needs Assessment: Report on Findings

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Faculty Development Needs Assessment: Report on Findings Institution: AIEP – Universidad Andrés Bello Response to Final Survey

  2. Project Staff Carmen (Lizy) Lamboy, Ed.D. Director Faculty Development January, 2009 Laureate Higher Education Group Network Products and Service To request additional information, please contact Laureate Higher Education Group Network Products and Service 701 Brickell Ave., Suite 860 Miami, FL 33131 (786) 425-0370 Faculty Needs Assessment: ReportLaureate Higher Education GroupNetwork Products and Service AIEP - Final

  3. Basic Information • This PowerPoint presentation summarizes descriptive statistics at the local level for AIEP at Universidad Andrés Bello. • Complete generalizations and conclusions are presented in the Final Report. • AIEP sample constitutes only 5.3% of the sample and less than 0.2% of the population. (n=47) • Faculty members are predominantly part-time (72.3%). AIEP Final

  4. Experience Data shows AIEP faculty are relatively new at teaching. More than half (53.3%) state having up to 5 years of teaching experience. Yet, 80.8% state having more that 6 years of professional experience. A great majority (89.4%) has no online teaching experience. AIEP Final

  5. Educational Levels • Only 21.3% of the faculty are currently engaged in completing a more advanced degree. • 60.0% of faculty who are currently studying are completing a masters degree. On-line programs are preferred (60.0%) among those studying. AIEP Final

  6. Education-Seeking Opportunities • Of the faculty seeking professional development, most are interested in completing a masters degree, followed by doctorate degree. Certificate program in the academic discipline was also one of the top interests. • Areas of top interest were Education and Business among faculty currently engaged in degree advancement or advanced certifications. AIEP Final

  7. Assessment of Current Professional Development, Interests and Costs • 70.2% rate current professional development opportunities as good to excellent. • Nearly three-fourth(74.5%) believe the professional development opportunities offered by the Laureate university they work with are equal or better than those offered by similar universities. • All Faculty are interested in additional professional development opportunities and 85.1% expect the university to help pay for their professional development. 8.51% state that the university should pay for professional development in its entirety. 36.2% are willing to pay up to 50% of professional development costs. • Over half (59.6%) of the faculty are not sure if the university offers reimbursement for professional development. Of those who responded that they did know reimbursement program were available, half (50%) were not sure of what the university requirements were to qualify for these programs. AIEP Final

  8. Top 5 Faculty Development Interests • Even though “Improving English proficiency for teaching and learning” was not one of the top five, over half of respondents presented this as important (61.7%). AIEP Final

  9. Technology Skills • Using Synchronous communication tools and CMS and LMS software are considered important by almost half of the faculty (46.8% and 42.6% respectively), yet over half of respondents reveal they have no skill in the usage of The lowest skill rating related to technology was using Wikis in Education and synchronous communication tools (69.0% at the “No Skill” level). • No one rated themselves at the “Expert level” in the use of CMS/LMS and Synchronous communication tools. • PowerPoint was rated as the most important technology for teaching (89.4%), but only 14.9% of the sample state mastering the software at an expert level. • The lowest ranking technologies in terms of importance were: Social Networking (4.26%), Blogs and Microsoft Access (both at 2.13%), and Microsoft Publisher (0.0%). AIEP Final

  10. Conclusions • Professional development activities in the area of online teaching should be explored as finding reveal that a great majority has no online teaching experience and is considered as one of the top five areas of interest by more than half of the sample. • Attention should be provided to the achievement of advancing the academic degrees of the faculty, especially in areas of masters degrees. NPS should be an instrument that opens up possibilities for assisting schools to advance the degrees of their faculty by 1) offering high-quality, discounted or tuition assisted programs to all faculty notwithstanding the type of contract • One topic that stands out is “Improving English proficiency for teaching and learning.” NPS should seek partners with energy and vision to help LIU network universities promote learning English as a second language or develop a program which developed within. Training will give faculty the opportunity to enhance their English skills for the purpose of teaching, but additionally learning, as they seek opportunities to complete an advanced degree. AIEP Final

More Related