1 / 30

Evaluation Basics for Youth Programs

Evaluation Basics for Youth Programs. Ben Silliman, Ph.D. Dept. of 4-H Youth Development. Reasons to Love Program Evaluation. Personal: feedback on personal effectiveness Practical: information for improving delivery Professional: process and outcomes data to show accountability, impact.

fay-christian
Télécharger la présentation

Evaluation Basics for Youth Programs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Evaluation Basics for Youth Programs Ben Silliman, Ph.D. Dept. of 4-H Youth Development

  2. Reasons to LoveProgram Evaluation • Personal: feedback on personal effectiveness • Practical: information for improving delivery • Professional: process and outcomes data to show accountability, impact

  3. Understanding Evaluation • Name the best thing(s) you’ve seen/experienced in a youth-at-risk program • Name the worst thing(s) you’ve seen/experienced in a youth-at-risk program

  4. Dimensions of Evaluation Good things come from… • A clear vision of what is happening • A positive climate for youth • Programs that make a difference • Organizations that run effective programs

  5. Dimensions of Evaluation Good things come from research-based… • Environmental scanning • Program evaluation • Outcome evaluation • Organizational/ professional evaluation

  6. Environmental ScanningWhat do people need?What resources do people have?

  7. Needs and Asset Mapping • Demographic Data • Community Economic and Social Surveys • Focus Groups • Targeted Needs Assessments • Community Coalition consensus

  8. Program EvaluationHow good is the program?

  9. Positive Climates/Best Practices • Safe Environments • Structure Appropriate for • Supportive Relationships • Social Inclusion • Standards of Conduct • Skill Learning Focused • Contribution-Oriented • Connections to Family, Community

  10. Program Climate • Physical and Psychological Safety • Safe, healthy facilities • Conflict resolution • Wellness habits

  11. Program Climate • Appropriate Structure • Clear consistent boundaries • Age-based opportunities • Effective monitoring

  12. Program Climate • Supportive Relationships • Warmth, affirmation • Communication • Positive guidance

  13. Program Climate • Opportunities to Belong • Acceptance, inclusion • Cultural diversity/ tolerance • Teamwork

  14. Program Climate • Positive Social Norms • High expectations for ethics, behavior • High achievement orientation • Service orientation

  15. Program Climate • Efficacy and Mattering • Growth in confidence and autonomy • Ability to make a difference • Meaningful changes effected with individuals, organizations, communities

  16. Program Climate • Opportunities for Skill Building • Mastery of practical skills in many domains • Ability to relate and navigate varied cultures • Improvements in vocation- related skills

  17. Program Climate • Integration with Family, School, and Community • Parent involvement and family activities at home • Increased academic performance and school leadership • Youth-adult partnership

  18. Outcome EvaluationWhat’s happening with the kids?

  19. Logic Model:Building a Game Plan • The Big Picture: Winning Legacy • Giant Steps: A Habit of Playing Well • Small Steps: Mastering the Fundamentals • The Right Stuff: Good Preparation • Setting the Table: Good Resources

  20. Inputs Investments of resources Money Staff Volunteers Equipment Supplies Effects of constraints Laws Regulations Funder requirements Outputs Products of programs Classes taught Materials distributed Hours of service Participants served The Logic of Evaluation • Outcomes • Short-term outcomes • Knowledge • Attitude • Skills • Aspirations Long-term outcomes (impacts) • Behavioral change • Social-economic change • Cultural change

  21. Evaluating Outcomesin Small Steps • Knowledge • Attitudes • Skills • Aspirations

  22. Outcome Domains • Physical • Health • Safety • Wellness • Risk Reduction

  23. Outcome Domains • Intellectual/Cognitive • Critical thinking/ problem solving • Academic achievement • Project skills/mastery • Decision-making • Creative thinking

  24. Outcome Domains • Emotional • Coping • Stress management • Optimism • Self-efficacy • Character

  25. Organizational/ProfessionalEvaluationHow (well) do leaders make things happen?

  26. Organizational Processes • Serving People • Designing and Producing Better Goods and Services • Building an Efficient and Effective Workforce

  27. Six Sigma Processes • Define the project goals and customer (internal and external) requirements • Measure and determine customer needs and specifications; benchmark competitors and industry • Analyze the process options to meet the customer needs • Design (detailed) the process to meet the customer needs • Verify the design performance and ability to meet customer needs

  28. Professional Evaluation • Professional Standards • Novice-to-Expert Rubrics and Certification for General & Specialized Competencies • Individual and Team goals, performance standards, and professional development • Continuous quality improvement

  29. Human Subjects • Satisfaction, description is program feedback • Individual performance change is consent-required feedback

  30. Replicating and SustainingPrograms • Stage 1: Program running as planned, having intended effect (Process Evaluation/Formative Evaluation/Quality Control) • Stage 2: Change in knowledge, attitude, skill, or aspiration (Outcome Evaluation/Summative Evaluation/Achievements & Impact)

More Related