1 / 7

Updating the ARCP Process

The ARCP process has been updated to address past challenges, particularly with a large cohort expected in March. Key changes include a strict timetable for communication, early warnings for assessors anticipating adverse outcomes, and more detailed role descriptions for educational supervisors and panel members. We emphasize reflective practice and structured feedback across all stages. While regular evidence uploads and revalidation statements remain unchanged, these improvements aim to enhance the robustness of outcomes and enhance user experience. Any suggestions or questions are welcome.

faye
Télécharger la présentation

Updating the ARCP Process

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Updating the ARCP Process Mary Corcoran - with thanks to all those who helped with the update.

  2. Why the update? • Process for last ARCP very clunky • Big cohort attending in March • Changes to Academic ARCPs • Revalidation requirements for StRs • Too many ‘surprises’ • Resilience BUT • Outcomes robust

  3. Key changes 1 Strict timetable: • Emails to Panel members, StRs and educational supervisors at: • 12 months; 3 months; 1 month; 2 weeks (portfolio ‘lockdown’) • Early warning to TPD if assessors anticipate any adverse outcome – 1 week before ARCP • Feedback next day if adverse; within 1 week to all StRs

  4. Key changes 2 • More detailed instructions/role descriptions for: • Educational supervisors • StRs • Panel member roles, incl. lay & external assessors • Feedback from Assessors (generic/anonymous) to Educational supervisors

  5. Additional: Emphasis on reflection for each piece of work Feedback from ARCP Panel (anonymous, generic) Standard file structure to be developed Implications for Educational supervisors No change: • Upload evidence regularly • Revalidation statements required • In general, 2 pieces of evidence for a LO sign off

  6. Implications for Assessors • More portfolios to review at a Panel • Structured feedback form for each portfolio reviewed • Feedback for Educational supervisors • Fast initial assessment for potential adverse outcomes (within 1 week) Still an excellent experience!

  7. Any suggestions?Any questions?

More Related