1 / 26

NetDSS Facilitating Implementation of a Depression Care Management Intervention Using Web-Based Decision Support

NetDSS Facilitating Implementation of a Depression Care Management Intervention Using Web-Based Decision Support. John Fortney, PhD June 17, 2008 South Central MIRECC HSR&D Center for Mental Health and Outcomes Research HSR&D Mental Health QUERI Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System.

fernando
Télécharger la présentation

NetDSS Facilitating Implementation of a Depression Care Management Intervention Using Web-Based Decision Support

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. NetDSSFacilitating Implementation of aDepression Care Management Intervention Using Web-Based Decision Support John Fortney, PhD June 17, 2008 South Central MIRECC HSR&D Center for Mental Health and Outcomes Research HSR&D Mental Health QUERI Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System

  2. Funding Sources • VA IIR 00-078-3 • VA IMV 04-360 • VA MNT 05-152 • NIMH R01 MH076908-01

  3. Clinical Background • 75% of patients treated for depression receive care in primary care settings • 20-50% of primary care patients stop taking medications in the first month of treatment • 30-50% of primary care patients don’t respond to the initial medication • 15-30% of primary care patients treated for depression receive guideline concordant care.

  4. Components of Collaborative Care • Use of informatics to track critical processes • Use of clinical practice guidelines • Stepped care model • Ready access to mental health specialists • Delegation of key provider functions to non-physician members of a practice team • Care Management

  5. Depression Care Management • Education and activation • Barrier assessment and resolution • Comorbidity assessment • Depression symptom monitoring • Suicide risk assessment • Medication adherence monitoring • Side-effects monitoring • Self Management goal setting and monitoring

  6. Telemedicine-Based Collaborative Care for CBOCs • Offsite depression care team • Nurse care manager • Pharmacist • Psychiatrist • Telephones • Care manager encounters with patients at home • Interactive Video • Psychiatric evaluations with patients at CBOC • Electronic Medical Records (CPRS) • Communication among on-site PCPs and offsite depression care team

  7. Effectiveness of TEAM Intervention • TEAM Study1,2 – Randomized effectiveness trial of telemedicine-based collaborative care in rural CBOCs • Increased medication adherence • Increased rates of response and remission • Increased health status • Increased patient satisfaction • Fortney JC, Pyne JM, Edlund MJ, Robinson DE, Mittal D, Henderson KL. Design and Implementation of the Telemedicine-Enhanced Antidepressant Management Study. General Hospital Psychiatry, 28(1): 18-26, 2006 • Fortney JC, Pyne JM, Edlund MJ, Robinson DE, Mittal D, Henderson KL. A Randomized Trial of Telemedicine-Based Collaborative Care for Depression, Journal of General Internal Medicine, in press.

  8. Medication Adherence Casemix-Adjusted Results OR=2.1p=0.04 OR=2.7p<0.01

  9. Response Casemix-Adjusted Results OR=1.4p=0.18 OR=1.9p=0.02

  10. RemissionCase-mix Adjusted Results OR=2.4p=0.02 OR=1.8p=0.14

  11. Mental Health Component (MCS) Casemix-Adjusted Results P<0.01 P=0.07

  12. Satisfaction Casemix-Adjusted Results OR=1.7p=0.03 OR=1.8p=0.01

  13. Implementation Research • Partners In Care study • Fidelity to the care manger protocol was lower than anticipated • Computerized tracking system was recommended as a result1. • RIPPLE Study • Implement telemedicine-based collaborative care in contract CBOCs. • Decision Support System was needed to maintain fidelity to the evidence base during implementation? • Rubenstein LV, Jackson-Triche M, Unutzer J, Miranda J, Minnium K, Pearson M, Wells K. Evidence-Based Care for Depression in Managed Primary Care Practices, Health Affairs, 18(5): 89-105, 1999.

  14. Design and Development of NetDSS

  15. Cross-functional Design Team • Bill Raney, RN – Depression Care Manager • Amanda Davis MA – Technical Writer • Chris Steven – Web programmer • Silas Williams – Web programmer • Richard Hedrick – Systems Analyst • Jeff Pyne, MD – Psychiatrist • John Fortney, PhD – Translator

  16. Scope • Users – Care Managers • Patients – PC patients with depression • Timing – Between PC visits • Purpose • Panel management • Trial management • Structured assessment • Decision support • Workload and Outcomes Reports

  17. Attributes • NetDCMS was designed to have most of the required features of a clinical information system as outlined in a recent article by Kilbourne and colleagues (2006) including: • Short training time, with uncluttered screens that are easy to navigate • Web-based • Use of drop menus and logic checks • Compliant with HIPAA standards and conforms to standards to internet security/encryption • Use of clinic reminders • Capability of creating individual care plans with self-management information and disease severity rating • Capacity to print out summary data on quality and other patient outcomes • Linked with, but not a substitute for electronic medical records • Supports multiple chronic illnesses • Kilbourne AM, McGinnis GF, Belnap BH, Klinkman M, Thomas M. The role of clinical information technology in depression care management. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2006 Jan;33(1):54-64.

  18. Features • NetDSS has the following functional capabilities: • patient registry and panel management • trial and phase management • encounter scheduler • decision support • progress note generator • workload report generator • NetDSS guides the care manager through a self-documenting and evidence-based patient encounter using scripts and self-scoring instruments which support: • patient education and activation • barrier assessment • comorbidity assessment • depression severity monitoring • suicide risk assessment • adherence monitoring • side-effect monitoring • self-management activities

  19. Registry Workload Report Database Care manager [ clinic [ provider [ patient ] ] ] Trial types [ phases [ success/failure ] ] Instrument scoring Outcomes tracking Automated Treatment Recommendations Decision Support Encounter Scheduler Assessments Progress Notes Story Board

  20. Story Board Evidence-Based Protocols User Interface Database Structure Trial Management Instruments and Scripts Panel Management Decision Support Assembling the Components

  21. Decisions • CPRS vs. stand-alone application • Target VA vs. private sector vs. both • Web-based vs. CD-ROM • Flexible vs. structured • User friendly vs. efficient

  22. Development Process • Rapid prototype-test-prototype product development cycles • Monthly planning meetings • Programming • User testing • Revisions & additions • Continuous beta test version (2 years) • Users Guide & Training Manual • Version 1.x with biannual updates (1.5 years)

  23. Current Users • VA RIPPLE Study (Contract CBOCs) • Little Rock, AR • Loma Linda, CA • Los Angeles, CA • VA HiTIDES Study (VA Medical Centers) • Little Rock, AR • Houston, TX • Atlanta, GA • NIMH OUTREACH Study (Federally Qualified Health Centers) • Little Rock, AR • Pine Bluff, AR • West Memphis, AR • Lepanto, AR • Corning, AR • Pochahontas, AR • Huntsville, AR • PC/MH Integration Initiative • Little Rock, AR • New Orleans, LA

  24. Web-Sites • Non-VA Version URL • https://www.netdss.net/ • VA Version URL • Send request from VA.gov email to: • virec@va.gov • John.Fortney@VA.gov

  25. NetDSS Demonstration

More Related