1 / 27

Andreas Barner Minneapolis, July 16, 2007

`. Healthcare and Innovation Trans-Atlantic Experts' Roundtable 2007. Opportunities and limitations for health care innovations in Germany. Andreas Barner Minneapolis, July 16, 2007. Health Care Innovations in Germany. The Opportunities:

Télécharger la présentation

Andreas Barner Minneapolis, July 16, 2007

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ` Healthcare and Innovation Trans-Atlantic Experts' Roundtable 2007 Opportunities and limitations for health care innovations in Germany Andreas Barner Minneapolis, July 16, 2007

  2. Health Care Innovations in Germany The Opportunities: • direct market access and reimbursement immediately after registration • fast registration in the EU

  3. Proportion of molecules available to patients at reference dateAll new medicines with marketing authorisation from 1 July 2002 to 30 June 2006 NB – Figure in parenthesis after country name represents the number of molecules with marketing authorisation in each country Source: IMS Management Consulting, May 2007

  4. Average time delay between marketing authorisation and market access (hospital and retail delays combined)All new medicines with marketing authorisation from 1 July 2002 to 30 June 2006 NB – Figure in parenthesis after country name represents the number of molecules included in the delay calculation; second number is Phase 6 delay Source: IMS Management Consulting, May 2007

  5. Average time difference between US and EMEA marketing authorisation datesUS dates subtracted from EMEA dates n=14 n=16 n=9 n=11 n=6 n=5 Since 2004, the delay between US and EMEA marketing authorisations has increased significantly Source: EFPIA Information Meeting, 30 May 2007

  6. Health Care Innovations in Germany The Opportunities: - direct market access and reimbursement immediately after registration • fast registration in the EU • in the early phase after registration innovation being honored

  7. Price differentials across the EU are narrowing dramatically 5 core markets all EU 16 * 2003 launches chosen to allow roll-out to be measured across the majority of countries 1997 2000 2001 2002 2003* Source: Cambridge Consultancy Analysis (Analysis covering NMEs launched by the top 14 pharma companies)

  8. Health Care Innovations in Germany The Opportunities: - direct market access and reimbursement immediately after registration - fast registration in the EU • in the early phase after registration innovation being honored • good research institutions (universities, Max-Planck-Society, etc.)

  9. Top 100 R&D Institutes worldwide Source: Webometrics

  10. Health Care Innovations in Germany The Opportunities: - direct market access and reimbursement immediately after registration - fast registration in the EU • in the early phase after registration innovation being honored • good research institutions (universities, Max-Planck-Society, etc.) • biotech companies and pharmaceutical industry active in Germany

  11. Biotechnology Companies in Europe for comparison: 1450 Companies in USA number of companies Source: Ernst & Young, 2005

  12. Patent Applications on Pharmaceuticals in Germany by Country of Origin Total USA Germany Japan Source: German Patent Office, 2006

  13. Patent Applications on Biopharmaceuticals in Germany by Country of Origin 2005: 1.375 Patents Others 22 % USA 43 % France 6 % Great Britain 6 % Germany 11 % Japan 12 % Source: German Patent Office, 2006

  14. Health Care Innovations in Germany The Limitations: • acceptance of innovations in Germany

  15. Innovative Medicines (NME) compared to other European countriesPercentage share of sales of innovative medicines brought to market in the last 5 years Result: Germany is bottom in Europe in adopting new medicines... As of: 2005 Source: European Pharmaceutical Associations, VFA

  16. … but top in prescribing generics Generics in European Pharmaceutical Markets(Percent of Market Sales Value at Ex-Factory Prices) As of: 2005 Source: EFPIA, VFA

  17. Health Care Innovations in Germany The Limitations: • acceptance of innovations in Germany • cost containment measures and health care reforms

  18. Health Care Reforms in Germany Gesund- heits- struktur- gesetz GKV-Soli- daritäts- stärkungs- gesetz Arznei- mittel- Ausgaben- begrenzungs- gesetz Gesund- heits- moderni sierungs- gesetz GKV-Wett- bewerbs- stärkungs- gesetz Festbetrags- anpassungs- gesetz GKV-Neu- ordnungs- gesetz Haushalts- begleit- gesetz 1983 1989 1992 1997 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2006 2007 200? Gesund- heits- reform- gesetz Beitrags- entlastungs- gesetz GKV-Gesund- heitsreform Arznei- mittel- budget- ablöse- gesetz Beitrags- sicherungs- gesetz Arznei- mittel- versorgungs- Wirtschaftlich- keitsgesetz ??? Source: Bayer Health Care

  19. Most recently: • April 1st 2007 “Law for the Strengthening of Competition in the Statutory Health Insurance (SHI)” affects: • Private health insurance, • Statutory health insurance, Hospitals, • Physicians, • Patients, • Pharmaceutical industry - patented + generics • The law stipulates: adherence to established international standards in benefit assessments and cost/benefit assessments (IQWiG)

  20. Health Care Innovations in Germany The Limitations: • acceptance of innovations in Germany • cost containment measures and healthcare reforms • patented compounds and generics in one reimbursement group • Institute for Quality and Efficiency in the Health Care Sector (IQWiG) – still to be proven to live up to convincing quality standards and internationally accepted scientific standards

  21. Introduction of health economic assessment: Structure of the decision making process Ministry of health (MoH) Tasks Supervision Supervision IQWiG G-BA Sawicki guest at G-BA meetings Panels Committees Departments Commissions Project groups Office Recommendations Decisions MoH has to approve G-BA decisions Statutory health insurance (90% of population), manufacturers

  22. Institute for Quality and Efficiency in the Health Care Sector (IQWiG) • Carrying out HEA and benefit analysis • Established 2004 as private foundation • Located in Cologne • Bodies: - Foundation Council and Executive Board - Scientific Advisory Council (10 members) - Board of Trustees (30 members) • 8 departments with 72 (50 scientific) staff • 2006 budget: EUR 11 million • Financed with funds from statutory health insurance • Public funding only if MoH commissions directly

  23. The new law reflects some of industry’s wishes • IQWiG will have to comply with international standards of both evidence-based medicine and health economics. • IQWiG must guarantee transparency and the participation of experts, industry and patients for ongoing and future assessments. • Participation of industry is required in all steps of the assessment. • Set of definitions of patient benefit is widened and determined by law.

  24. Recent IQWiG Reports/Draft Reports are being debated controversially • stem cell transplantation • antihypertensives (draft report)(e. g. in contrast to NICE evaluation) • the atorvastatin case(e. g. in contrast to decisions taken by formularies in the US) • short-acting insulin analogues(in contrast e.g. of International Diabetes Federation, also a Cochrane recommendation)

  25. Conclusions • Germany has a history of good access to innovations in health care with immediate access to directly after registration • Germany has a variety of very good research institutions, of pharmaceutical companies and of biotech companies to continue to be attractive for scientists and companies.

  26. Conclusions • Germany has in the recent past had many cost containment measures and endorsed legislations which decreased the value of patents and innovation. • The institutions to judge the value of innovations (in particular the IQWiG) still need to demonstrate that they can live up to international standards.

  27. Thank you for your attention

More Related