1 / 64

September 9, 2010 Macao, China Kamoto

Report of W GH. September 9, 2010 Macao, China Kamoto. Progresses of WGH AOP 2010 New Proposed Projected and WGH AOP 2011 Budget for WGH 2011. Date 6 ~ 8 Sept . 2010 Participants

finn
Télécharger la présentation

September 9, 2010 Macao, China Kamoto

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Report of WGH September 9, 2010 Macao, China Kamoto

  2. Progresses of WGH AOP 2010 • New Proposed Projected and WGH AOP 2011 • Budget for WGH 2011

  3. Date 6~ 8 Sept. 2010 Participants 23 from 10 Members (China, DPRKorea, Japan, Laos, Malaysia, Philippines, ROKorea, Thailand, USA, VietNam) and ESCAP, TCS

  4. Objectives • To exchange information on priorities and key areas • To review progress of the AOP 2010 • To consolidate achievements of priority projects • To identify priority and strategic needs of the TC Members • To propose budget for WGH in 2011

  5. Progresses of AOPs 2010

  6. AOP1 On-the-Job Training on Flood Forecasting for TC members • KRA 1, 6 and 7 • Driver: Malaysia • Launched in 2002 • To be closed in 2010

  7. OJT Objectives • gain knowledge, appreciation and experience on use of the Tank Model for flood forecasting； • configure a flood forecasting model based on the Tank Model for a selected catchment in the participant’s country； • calibrate the Tank Model and preparing the model for operational use in the participant’s respective organization； • develop expertise in writing simple macros (MSExcel) to automate model computations – a skill which can be used to customize the model and further enhance the model in the future.

  8. Main Benefit to Trainees • understand the concept of the Tank Model in simulating flood runoff. • configure and calibrate a Tank Model for a river basin in the participant’s country. • develop expertise in simple programming techniques which is useful for future continual enhancement of the model which is to be expected

  9. The 1st OJT: 21 Jan – 28 Feb. 2008 • The 2nd OJT: 01– 31 Dec. 2008 • The 3rd OJT: 21 July – 23 Aug. 2009 • The 4th OJT: 12 July~ 06 Aug. 2010

  10. Participants at the OJTs • 11 trainees from TC Members • 43 trainees for Malaysia

  11. Funding

  12. Participating Members (China, Laos, Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam) submit report of OJT to TCS before the end of December, 2010. • TCS prepare a thanks-letter to DID, Malaysia before TC 43rd Session.

  13. AOP2 Urban Flood Risk Management (UFRM) in TC region • KRA 1, 2, 4 and 5 • Driver: China • Duration: 2008-2011 (4 years) • On-going project

  14. Major Footprints 2008 September IWS in Beijing - Proposed by MWR China as a new WGH project 2009 January41st Annual Session in Cheng Mai - Confirmed as new project - Decision to survey TC WGH Focal Point 2009 SeptemberIWS in Cebu - Introduced results of survey by MWR China 2009 DecemberTelecom of WGH AWG meeting in Macao - Discussed Mechanism and Major activities

  15. Major Footprints (Cont.) 2010 January 42nd Annual Session in Singapore - Confirmed as cross-cutting project of TC - Decision to survey 3 Members (China, Japan and R. of Korea) as good practice on UFRM (Side meeting) - Decision to have a Task Force (TF) Meeting - Decision to consult with ESCAP to fund an expert meeting of UFRM and the possibility of contracting consultants to push forward the project. 2010 July Expert (TF) Meeting in Bangkok - Finalize the Roadmap - establishment of the Task Force for UFRM 2010 September5th TC IWS in Macao

  16. Progress in 2010 • Questionnaire for collecting good practice TC Circular Letter to: • Shanghai (China) • Yokohama (Japan) • Ansung (R. of Korea)

  17. To highlight the land use planning. To enhance meteor-hydrological monitoring, forecasting and warning to provide timely, accurate and all-sided information support to the urban flood management. To build up various dissemination ways of flood warning information to individual residents To apply flood hazard/risk map widely as an important technique of urban flood preparedness. To emphasize on the function of retarding basins and discharge ponds in the urban flood management To establish the comprehensive urban flood management strategy a b c e d f Good practices in urban flood management

  18. TC UFRM Expert (TF) Meeting UNITED NATIONS ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMISSION FOR ASIA AND THE PACIFIC Strengthening regional cooperation towards flood resilient cities considering climate change: ESCAP/WMO Typhoon Committee Meeting on Urban Flood Risk Management Project 19-20 July 2010 Bangkok

  19. Participants • 12 representatives from TC Members: China; Hong Kong, China; Japan; Macao, China; Philippines; Republic of Korea; Thailand and Vietnam; • 3 resource persons from International Centre for Water Hazard and Risk Management (ICHARM), Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) and the ESCAP publication on Innovative Strategies for Flood Resilient Cities; • 15 representatives from UNDP, UN/ISDR, UNOCHA, ADPC, ESCAP, WMO and TCS.

  20. Project Overview and Information exchange • Mechanism of implementing UFRM • Selection of Pilot Cities for the UFRM • Activities of next steps • Make clearly Objectives, Target areas and Outputs • Roll of Task Force • Roll of National Focal Points in Pilot City • Support groups • Financial Resources Topics for discussion

  21. Project Overview • Background information on UFRM as the cross-cutting project among the 3 TC Working Groups was introduced by Chair of WGH; • The analysis of the questionnaire on good practices of UFRM project of 3 cities: Shanghai, Yokohama and Busan was reported by project leader; • Representatives from Philippines, Viet Nam, Thailand and Macao made the presentation on the impacts of flooding in Manila, Hanoi, Hat Yai and Macao.

  22. - Report to TC Session - Guidebook (Pilot Studies) (Recommendations) (Good Practice Inventory) (Useful materials) • -Contribute to other TC Members Typhoon Committee - Guidance material - Advice - Materials - Analysis Coach Player UFRM TF Chairs Vice-chairs TCS Observer National Focal Point of P.C. TC AWG - Information - Results - Outputs - Advice -Fund Rising - Project Formation - Consultation - Workshop - Advice - Materials - Fund - Advice - Materials - Advice - Materials Supporter Supporter Support Groups ESCAP, WMO Structure of UFRM project (draft) Mechanism of Implementing UFRM

  23. The Terms of Reference (TOR) of TF • Objective of Task Force • The main objective of the Task Force is to provide technical advisory to the cross cutting project of UFRM, including the following activities: • Inventory of good practices • Develop manual for implementation of the project • Provision of technical advisory for pilot case studies. • 2. The Task Force will also create guidance material for UFRM based on the good practices and the pilot city studies, which can be used in other countries.

  24. Structure and Organization of TF • The Task Force consists of the three chairs and vice-chairs of the three Working Groups of TC, and TC Secretariat. • The chair of the WGH is the leader of the Task Force. • Support Groups which are approved by the Task Force can participate, fund and give advice to the pilot case studies. • Activities of Task Force members will be supported by in-kind contribution of Task Force members, however, contributions from donors are to be sought. In kind contribution from TC members and interested partners is encouraged. • The Task Force will be coordinated and supported by the Advisory Working Group (AWG) of TC.

  25. Reporting of TF The Task Force is required to provide timely progress report at TC session and seek advice when necessary.

  26. Pilot Cities of UFRM Project • The criteria for selecting pilot cities: • Cities which their national focal points are willing to conduct studies and have agreed on using the study result in the guidance material; • Cities which were frequently affected by floods or storm surges induced by typhoons; • Cities which are socio-economically and environmentally important in their countries, as well as in the region or areas. The pilot case studies will be implemented by national focal points, based on the manual for implementation of the project, with supports from various sources.

  27. Four pilot Cities and the contact persons: • Metro Manila, Philippines, Dr. Susan R. Espinueva, • Hanoi, Viet Nam, Ms. Nguyen Lan Chau • HatYai, Thailand, Mr. Thosakdi Vanichkajom • Macao, China, Mr. TANG Iu Man

  28. The Pilot Cities will be benefited by: • receiving the technical advices in view of reducing urban flood risk in the city in perspectives of meteorology, hydrology, disaster risk reduction as well as TC members such as exchanging the experiences on members’ good practices; • potentially receiving financial support to hold workshop on urban flood risk reduction from Support Groups of UFRM; • receiving the technical advices and the latest information from TC network on specific topics as requested by the cities; and • receiving TC-AWG’s support to liaise with donors on urban flood risk reduction projects formulation.

  29. Support Groups of UFRM Project TC is suggested to seek the further technical cooperation or funding support from UN agencies, international organizations, private companies or individuals as Support Groups of UFRM. • WMO, ADPC, ADRC, ICHARM and JAXA were initially proposed as support groups of the project; • MLIT-Japan, MLTM- RoK, JICA, KOICA, ADB, WB-GFDRR also are suggested as the potential Support Groups, Although we need negotiation in advance.

  30. The Support Groups will be benefited from: • excellent opportunity to show their visibility in the TC network; • excellent opportunity to introduce their knowledge, technology and system to reduce flood risk in the pilot cities; • excellent information on urban flood risk management in the pilot cities in perspectives of meteorology, hydrology, disaster risk reduction as well as their well-planned collaboration, e.g. other TC Members’ good practices; and • opportunities to participate in the workshops on urban flood risk reduction which are organized and supported by the Support Groups of UFRM.

  31. Timeline of UFRM project • September 2010 • Task force (TF) prepare and discuss draft guidance material for pilot study; • Send invitation of pilot study to TC Members; • Send invitation letter to potential support group (SG). • Confirmation of Pilot Cities (PC); • January 2011 • Finalize of guidance material for pilot study and sent it to PC; • Confirmation of SG. • March 2011 • PC prepare the implementation plan in consultation with TF; • Implementation of pilot study (TF members visit PC). • January 2012 • TF reports to the Annual TC Session

  32. Activities of Next Steps of UFRM

  33. ESCAP is ready to provide USD 5,000 for consultancy on the desk review of the proposed cities. The money must be spent by the end of this year. ESCAP will seek funding to suppot TF member mission to PC in 2011 Small meeting in June/July...

  34. AOP3Assessment System of Socio-economic Impacts of Water-related Disasters for Infrastructure • KRA 1, 2, 4 and 5 • Driver: Republic of Korea • Duration: 2008-2012 (5years) • On-going project ---- Korean side is arranging one-day WS. on Jan. 2011

  35. The purpose • to establish the assessment system of flood control measures • To develop the highly applicable system for international cooperation among member countries. • to analyze socio-economic impacts of flood control measures, and to present standards for selecting an optimal alternate.

  36. Expected results Integrated Assessment system Assessment system construction Construction of independent shell program Integrated and consistent process construction for the assessment and deduction of flood control measures Construction of program and user manual available in domestic and abroad region Integrated assessment system completion of flood control measures Objective assessment & deduction Socio-Economic impact analysis Objective assessment and deduction of flood control measures Multilateral consideration of flood damage Suggesting reasonable standards of flood control measures

  37. Project schedule Maintenance and utilization Inside module construction Requirements analysis of users and analysis of structural measures Framing the plans for maintenance and utilization System construction Flood control assessment system Damage estimation and economic module construction Present status analysis & establishment of plans D/B, module, and system construction 2012 Module design of the system and module D/B design 2011 Investigation of domestic and foreign flood control assessment system and establishment of plans 2010 2009 2008

  38. AOP4 Hazard Mapping for Sediment-related disasters • KRA 1, 2, 4 and 5 • Driver: Japan • Duration: 2009-2011 • On-going project

  39. Objective • To develop & modify a method to designate area with high risk of sediment-related disasters • To apply the method to some pilot areas of TC Member Fig. Conceptual image of identification of area with high risk of sediment-related disaster caused by debris flow. In case of JAPAN Government controls developments in area where are designated as the “Special Sediment-related Disaster Hazard Area”. And government releases information on sediment-related disaster through Internet, TV and so on.

  40. Progresses • 1st year (2009) • Japan distributed a draft of guideline and opened THD. • Member countries selected model sites. Guideline • China • Hongkong, China • The Philippines • Thailand • United States • Japan Help-Desk

  41. 2nd year (2010) • Field Training (priot to 5th TC IWS) • Member countries draw hazardous area in the model sites. • Discuss technical problems at WS. Plan in next year • 3rd year (2011) • Members countries make Hazard map. • Publish the guidelineto reduce damage of sediment-related disaster and to spread Japanese technique inTyphoon Committee Region.

  42. AOP5 Establishment of Flood Disaster Preparedness Indices • KRA 1, 2, 4 and 5 • Driver: Japan • Duration: 2009~2011 • On-going project

  43. Target: Improvement of disaster preparedness level of local governments • When facing disasters, while role of central government is important, in many countries, assistance from the central government is often insufficient and not timely. • Therefore enhancing disaster preparedness level of local Governments/communities is the key for flood management, by objectively checking/assessing the basic requirement items. • It is necessary to develop and apply common and convenient tools to assess and measures the level of flood preparedness level of LGs. • There is, however, no well-structured set of widely recognized indicators that can be used for periodical self-assessment by local governments.

  44. Development and application of commonly applicable indices possibly by questionnaire survey

  45. Requirements for FDPI • Designed for self and periodicalself-assessment by local governments • Usable for bothdeveloping and developed countries • Should be assessed objectively by available data/information andavoid arbitral evaluationby different evaluators • Indicators need to beappropriately weighedfor detecting weakness factors • Useful for not only LGs, but also for national governments and donor communities for identifying support needs For positive spiral of disaster management cycle

  46. MITIGATION RECOVERY PREPAREDNESS RESPONSE Indicators could be compiled and tested e.g. According to disaster management cycle 1. General questions 2. Mitigation 3. Preparedness 4. Response 5. Recovery

  47. Project Timeline for 2010 1. Before the IWS at Macao; ICHARM, lead organization of this Flood Disaster Preparedness Indices (FDPI) project, had developed a set of disaster preparedness indices (a questionnaire survey including 78 points to be checked). At the same time, ICARM acquired the web site at http://www.fdpi.jp/fdpi/ where proposed questionnaire survey will be taken. 2. During Macao IWS; Japan will present in detail the configuration of questionnaire set together with introduction of the usage of newly-opened web-page from where questionnaire surveys will be taken. TC Members are then requested to cater this info. to disaster managers in many municipalities/communities in each territory. 3. By end-2010; Questionnaire survey will hopefully be participated by numerous number of municipalities/communities in TC members. Answers will be compiled and processed by ICHARM. Municipalities/communities will receive from ICHARM results of overall situation paper for flood preparedness level in TC region, as well as diagnosis report of flood preparedness level of each participating body.

  48. We have just prepared the site http://www.fdpi.jp/fdpi/ -Terms and Condition -78 questions - Confirmation and sending

  49. New Proposed Projected and WGH AOP 2011

  50. 1. Assessment of the Variability of Water Resources Impacted by Climate Change • KRA: • Proposed driver: Philippines • Proposed in: 2009 at Cebu IWS • New Proposed Project

More Related