180 likes | 300 Vues
This outline presents insights from the Innovation Task Force at DePaul University, highlighting the obstacles to innovation and the need for interdisciplinary collaboration. It discusses the vital role of tenure-track faculty as sources of energy for the institution and presents key findings that emphasize DePaul's agility in introducing new programs. The proposal for a Collaboratory for Interdisciplinary Research aims to foster collaborative faculty efforts across colleges. Key strategies include relaxing rules, making time and space for collaboration, and addressing structural obstacles to drive innovation in the academic environment.
E N D
A Collaboratory to Support Interdisciplinary Projects Robin Burke Greg Scott Mess Hall May 19, 2014
Outline • Innovation task force • Obstacles to innovation • A proposal
Innovation Task Force • Charged with proposing mechanisms for enhancing academic innovation at DePaul • Two main areas • Curriculum • Delivery
Tenure-Track Faculty • Essential, but • Expensive • Long-term investment • Profitability depends on “filling the seats” • Passive • Depreciates over time • Fungible • Consumer of institutional resources
Tenure-Track Faculty • Essential, but • Expensive • Long-term investment • Source of energy • Fuels the institution
Key findings I • DePaul is relatively nimble • much easier for us to introduce new, high-quality programs • new programs tend to grow both students and revenue • But • the process is unfocused, “hero-driven” • support for new programs is lacking • marketing is a weak spot
Key findings II • Cross-disciplinary collaboration is particularly hard • Many structural disincentives • college-centered metrics • majors, FTEs, etc. • college-centered resource allocation • budget, faculty lines, space, etc.
But the future • is interdisciplinary
Deans’ concept • AVP for Innovation • external • market research: what are the needs? • internal • capabilities: what can we do? • resources • funding to the deans to launch and market programs • Top-down process • administrators are visionaries • faculty are implementers • Not interdisciplinary
An Alternative View • Support faculty collaboration esp. across disciplines • Attack structural obstacles directly • Let innovation arise from creative interchange
CIRSCI • Collaboratory for Interdisciplinary Research, Scholarship and Curricular Innovation • Support faculty (esp. across colleges) to work jointly on research and curriculum projects • Email me rburke@cs.depaul.edu for a copy of the proposal
Four strategies • Relax the rules • make it possible to experiment • Make time • lower the cost of innovation • Make space • need to be together to work together • Don’t break what’s working • federate existing interdisciplinary centers
Fiscal Reality • Difficult to get resources in the current climate • But innovation doesn’t come for free
Signs of progress • Faculty Council Resolution on Collaboration • Approved by Faculty Council March 5 • Approved by the Provost March 24 • Main points • QIC / URC set-asides for cross-college projects • University-wide programs (Liberal studies, Honors and Study Abroad) should support collaborative courses • Faculty Council will work the Academic Affairs: • a number of potential initiatives including: • “exploring ways to create free-standing units at the university level (rather than in a particular college) to house collaborative work”
Discussion • Let’s talk about collaboration • what do we need? • how do we get there?
Resolution • Approved by Faculty Council March 5 • Endorsed by the Provost March 24