1 / 24

Impulsivity and Deep Brain Stimulation

Impulsivity and Deep Brain Stimulation. “Hold Your Horses: Impulsivity, Deep Brain Stimulation, and Medication in Parkinsonism” Michael J. Frank, Johan Samanta , Ahmed A. Moustafa , Scott Sherman Reviewed by XXXXX. Hypotheses. Patients will show lack of reinforcement learning.

fisseha
Télécharger la présentation

Impulsivity and Deep Brain Stimulation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Impulsivity and Deep Brain Stimulation “Hold Your Horses: Impulsivity, Deep Brain Stimulation, and Medication in Parkinsonism” Michael J. Frank, Johan Samanta, Ahmed A. Moustafa, Scott Sherman Reviewed by XXXXX

  2. Hypotheses • Patients will show lack of reinforcement learning. • Medication will impair negative feedback learning. • DBS will impair high conflict slowing response.

  3. Definitions • Reinforcement Learning – Learning with positive or negative feedback • Negative Feedback Learning – Learning after making error • High Conflict Slowing Response – Pause before making win/win or lose/lose decisions • “Should you vacation in Montreal or Rome?” • “Should you eat chocolate fondue or tiramisu?” • Neither option crosses “critical decision threshold” (STN)

  4. Participants Demographics

  5. Exclusion Criteria • Significant medical history • Concurrent illness (Schizophrenia, Manic Depression) • History of drug abuse/alcoholism • Advanced symptoms (stage V) • MMSE<24 (to screen for dementia) • Additional medications thought to confound findings

  6. Methods • Four Groups of Participants • On/Off medication • On/Off DBS (stimulating in the STN) • Probabilistic Selection Task • Training • AB (A=80%), CD (C=70%), EF (E=60%) • Training (AB=65%, CD=60%, EF=50%) • Test • Novel test pairs • Measured number of correct responses and response times • *non-specific keys for response

  7. Example of Training

  8. Training B A 80% 20%

  9. Correct!

  10. Incorrect

  11. No response detected

  12. Measurements • Positive Feedback Learning – Choosing “A” in novel test pairs • Negative Feedback Learning – Avoiding “B” in novel test pairs • Compared to positive feedback learning • Conflict Effects – Reaction times of novel test pairs with similar reinforcement values as compared to those with dissimilar values

  13. Testing for Negative Feedback Learning Impairment

  14. Testing for High-Conflict Slowing Response Impairment

  15. Results • Feedback learning unaffected in on/off DBS groups • On DBS group differed from off DBS group in conflict effects • On DBS seemed to even speed up with high conflict pairs • No change in high-conflict slowing response in on/off medication groups • On medication group was impaired at negative feedback learning.

  16. Results (cont.) • In on DBS group, the more severe the impairment of high-conflict slowing response, the more errors • On DBS responded faster to high-conflict win/win pairs as opposed to lose/lose pairs

  17. Impairment of Negative Reinforcement for On Medication Group

  18. Impairment of High-Conflict Slowing Response for On DBS Group

  19. Confirmation of Results • “Retrograde DBS procedure” • Off DBS retested with stimulators turned on • Same results found as with on DBS group • Control group also retested with same time delay • No change in conflict-induced slowing response • Off Medication group retested with different time delay • No change in conflict-induced slowing response

  20. Applications • Two roles of Basal Ganglia in decision making • One area of striatum is composed of “Go” neurons (D1 receptors) • Seek reinforcement • Dopamine increases with reinforcement • Another area of the striatum is composed of “No Go” neurons (D2 receptors) • Avoid non-reinforcing stimuli • Dopamine decreases without reinforcement • Medications prevent decrease in dopamine necessary for negative feedback learning

  21. Applications (cont.) • STN provides “Hold Your Horses” response when decision-conflict is high • Two theories of how DBS works • DBS acts as lesion • DBS over-activates STN • Neurons in the STN are firing all the time instead of selectively during high-conflict decision making • With impairment in negative feedback learning and lack of high-conflict slowing response it is easy to understand how one could begin to gamble

  22. Critique of Study • Pros • Controlled for age and education • Controlled for motor deficiencies • Control group • Control group retested • Cons • Attrition • DBS groups had more years diagnosed • No random assignment

  23. Additional Research • Contarino et al. found that hypersexuality and hypomania may be caused by DBS • Desbonnet et al. found premature responding in rats with STN stimulation • Uslaner and Robinson found that STN lesions in rats increased impulsive action • Smeding et al. conducted case study of patient who began DBS and acquired gambling addiction

  24. Thanks!

More Related