1 / 112

Mendel's Laws of Inheritance: Gene Segregation and Allele Dominance

This chapter explores Gregor Mendel's groundbreaking work on heredity, where he formulated laws of gene segregation and allele dominance. Mendel's experiments with pea plants laid the foundation for understanding inheritance patterns.

fnewell
Télécharger la présentation

Mendel's Laws of Inheritance: Gene Segregation and Allele Dominance

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Chapter 11 Mendelian Patterns of Inheritance

  2. CO 11

  3. Mendel was an Austrian monk. Mendel formulated two fundamental laws of heredity in the early 1860s. He had previously studied science and mathematics at the University of Vienna. 11.1 Gregor Mendel

  4. At time of his research, he was a substitute science teacher at a local technical high school. Prior to Mendel’s work, investigators had been trying to support a “blending” concept of inheritance. 11.1 Gregor Mendel

  5. 11.1 Gregor Mendel • Blending Concept of Inheritance • This theory stated that offspring would have traits intermediate between those of the parents. • Red and white flowers produce pink flowers; any return to red or white offspring was considered instability in the genetic material.

  6. 11.1 Gregor Mendel 3. Charles Darwin wanted to develop a theory of evolution based on hereditary principles; blending theory was of no help. a. A blending theory did not account for variation (differences) and could not explain species diversity. b. The particulate theory of inheritance proposed by Mendel can account for presence of differences among members of a population generation after generation. c. Mendel’s work was unrecognized until 1900; Darwin was never able to use it to support his theory of evolution.

  7. 11.1 Gregor Mendel • Mendel’s Experimental Procedure • Because Mendel had a mathematical background, he used a statistical basis for his breeding experiments.

  8. 11.1 Gregor Mendel • Mendel prepared his experiments carefully and conducted preliminary studies. • He chose the garden pea, Pisum sativum, because peas were easy to cultivate, had a short generation time, and could be cross-pollinated by hand. • From many varieties, Mendel chose 22 true-breeding varieties for his experiments.

  9. Figure 11.2b

  10. 11.1 Gregor Mendel • True-breeding varieties had all offspring like the parents and like each other. • Mendel studied simple traits (e.g., seed shape and color, flower color, etc.).

  11. Figure 11.2a

  12. 11.1 Gregor Mendel • Mendel traced inheritance of individual traits and kept careful records of numbers. • He used his understanding of mathematical principles of probability to interpret results. • He arrived at a particulate theory of inheritance because it is based on the existence of minute particles—now called genes.

  13. Figure 11.2

  14. 11.2 Mendel’s Law of Segregation • Mendel confirmed that his tall plants always had tall offspring, i.e., were true-breeding, before crossing two different strains that differed in only one trait—this is called a monohybrid cross. • A monohybrid cross is between two parent organisms true-breeding for two distinct forms of one trait.

  15. 11.2 Mendel’s Law of Segregation • Mendel tracked each trait through two generations. • P generation is the parental generation in a breeding experiment. • F1 generation isthe first-generation offspring in a breeding experiment. • F2 generation isthe second-generation offspring in a breeding experiment.

  16. Figure 11.3

  17. 11.2 Mendel’s Law of Segregation • He performed reciprocal crosses, i.e. pollen of tall plant to stigma of short plant and viceversa. • His results were contrary to those predicted by a blending theory of inheritance. • He found that the F1 plants resembled only one of the parents.

  18. 11.2 Mendel’s Law of Segregation • Characteristics of other parent reappeared in about 1/4 of F2 plants; 3/4 of offspring resembled the F1 plants. • Mendel saw that these 3:1 results were possible if: • F1 hybrids contained two factors for each trait, one being dominant and the other recessive; • factors separated when gametes were formed; a gamete carried one copy of each factor; • and random fusion of all possible gametes occurred upon fertilization.

  19. Figure 11.3

  20. 11.2 Mendel’s Law of Segregation • Results of his experiments led Mendel to develop his first law of inheritance—the law of segregation: • Each organism contains two factors for each trait. • Factors segregate in the formation of gametes. • Each gamete contains one factor for each trait. • Fertilization gives each new individual two factors for each trait.

  21. 11.2 Mendel’s Law of Segregation • Example of segregation • Homozygous dominant x homozygous recessive • Homozygous recessive x heterzygous

  22. 11.2 Mendel’s Law of Segregation • As Viewed by Modern Genetics • Each trait in a pea plant is controlled by two alleles, alternate forms of a gene that occur at the same gene locus on homologous chromosomes. • dominant allele masks or hides expression of a recessiveallele; it is represented by an uppercase letter.

  23. 11.2 Mendel’s Law of Segregation 3. A recessive allele is an allele that exerts its effect only in the homozygous state; its expression is masked by a dominant allele; it is represented by a lowercase letter. • The gene locus is the specific location of alleles on homologous chromosomes.

  24. Figure 11.4a

  25. Figure 11.4b

  26. Figure 11.4

  27. 11.2 Mendel’s Law of Segregation • The process of meiosis explains Mendel’s law of segregation. • In Mendel’s cross, the parents were true-breeding; each parent had two identical alleles for a trait–they were homozygous, indicating they possess two identical alleles for a trait.

  28. 11.2 Mendel’s Law of Segregation • Homozygous dominant genotypes possess two dominant alleles for a trait. • Homozygous recessive genotypes possess two recessive alleles for a trait.

  29. Figure 11.4

  30. 11.2 Mendel’s Law of Segregation • After cross-pollination, all individuals of the F1 generation had one of each type of allele. • Heterozygous genotypes possess one of each allele for a particular trait. • The allele not expressed in a heterozygote is a recessive allele.

  31. Table 11.1

  32. 11.2 Mendel’s Law of Segregation • sample

  33. 11.2 Mendel’s Law of Segregation • Genotype Versus Phenotype 1. Two organisms with different allele combinations can have the same outward appearance (e.g., TT and Tt pea plants are both tall; therefore, it is necessary to distinguish between alleles present and the appearance of the organism).

  34. 11.2 Mendel’s Law of Segregation • Genotype refers to the alleles an individual receives at fertilization (dominant, recessive). • Phenotype refers to the physical appearance of the individual (tall, short, etc.).

  35. 11.2 Mendel’s Law of Segregation • One-trait Genetics Problems • First determine which characteristic is dominant; then code the alleles involved. • Determine the genotype and gametes for both parents; an individual has two alleles for each trait; each gamete has only one allele for each trait. • Each gamete is haploid; each has a 50% chance of receiving either allele.

  36. example

  37. 11.2 Mendel’s Law of Segregation • Laws of Probability • Probability is the likely outcome a given event will occur from random chance. • For example, with every coin flip there is a 50% chance of heads and 50% chance of tails. • Chance of inheriting one of either two alleles from a parent is also 50%.

  38. 11.2 Mendel’s Law of Segregation • The multiplicative law of probability states that the chance of two or more independent events occurring together is the product of the probability of the events occurring separately. • The chance of inheriting a specific allele from one parent and a specific allele from another is ½ x ½ or 1/4. • Possible combinations for the alleles Ee of heterozygous parents are the following: • EE = ½ x ½ = 1/4 eE = ½ x ½ = 1/4 • Ee = ½ x ½ = 1/4 ee = ½ x ½ = 1/4

  39. 11.2 Mendel’s Law of Segregation 3. The additive law of probabilitycalculates the probability of an event that occurs in two or more independent ways; it is the sum of individual probabilities of each way an event can occur; in the above example where unattached earlobes are dominant (EE,Ee, and eE), the chance for unattached earlobes is 1/4 + 1/4 + 1/4 = 3/4.

  40. 11.2 Mendel’s Law of Segregation • The Punnett Square • The Punnett square was introduced by R. C. Punnett (early 1900s) and provides a simple method to calculate the probable results of a genetic cross. • In a Punnett square, all possible types of sperm alleles are lined up vertically and all possible egg alleles are lined up horizontally; every possible combination is placed in squares.

  41. 11.2 Mendel’s Law of Segregation • The larger the sample size examined, the more likely the outcome will reflect predicted ratios; a large number of offspring must be counted to observe the expected results; only in that way can all possible genetic types of sperm fertilize all possible types of eggs. • Specific crosses in humans cannot be done in order to count many offspring; therefore in humans, the phenotypic ratio is used to estimate the probability of any child having a particular characteristic.

  42. 11.2 Mendel’s Law of Segregation • Punnett square uses laws of probability; it does not dictate what the next child will inherit. • “Chance has no memory”: if two heterozygous parents have a first child with attached earlobes (likely in 1/4th of children), a second child born still has 1/4 chance of having attached earlobes.

  43. Figure 11.5

  44. 11.2 Mendel’s Law of Segregation • Examples

  45. 11.2 Mendel’s Law of Segregation • One-Trait Testcross • To confirm that the F1 was heterozygous, Mendel crossed his F1 plants with homozygous recessive plants. • Results indicated the recessive factor was present in the F1 plants; they were thus heterozygous.

  46. A monohybrid testcross isusedbetween an individual with dominant phenotype and an individual with a recessive phenotype to see if the individual with dominant phenotype is homozygous or heterozygous.

  47. Figure 11.6

  48. Figure 11.6a

  49. Figure 11.6b

More Related