1 / 8

Evaluating and Reflecting on the Map-making Process

Evaluating and Reflecting on the Map-making Process. Tools for Success. By: Nigel Crawhall. Unit: M15U01. Adopting a methodology. There are different methodologies for planning, monitoring and evaluating projects.

fola
Télécharger la présentation

Evaluating and Reflecting on the Map-making Process

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Evaluating and Reflecting on the Map-making Process Tools for Success By: Nigel Crawhall Unit: M15U01

  2. Adopting a methodology • There are different methodologies for planning, monitoring and evaluating projects. • Adopting a particular method helps to be consistent and check key points in the planning and assessment tool kit. • Logical Framework (ZOPP) and Appreciative Inquiry are examples.

  3. Scale of results • Development goal: This is the overall positive, long-term result the community seeks. • Project purpose: This is the immediate outcome of implementing this project and should contribute to the development goal. • Results/objectives: A project purpose is made up of smaller steps and outputs which together assure that the project purpose is achieved.

  4. Planning, monitoring & evaluation • Planning, monitoring and evaluation are all part of one process. • Planning sets the objectives. • Monitoring helps check that the objectives are on track. • Evaluation measures whether the overall project purpose has been met. • Evaluation also provides a chance to reflect on the overall process and empowerment.

  5. Planning • Adopt a methodology appropriate to the context. • Develop an analysis of the negative situation that should be solved. • Specify the target group (i.e. those in the community who will do the actions). • Identify levels of desired results: development goal, project purpose, results leading to the project purpose

  6. Monitoring • Every result in the project needs an indicator to help determine whether you are achieving the result as planned. • Indicators should at least give quantity, quality, time and location for the result. • Monitoring involves collecting data as events happen. • Objectively verifiable indicators (OVIs) make your work transparent to donors, the whole community and others.

  7. Planning, monitoring and evaluating cycles

  8. Evaluation • Evaluation can be summative (i.e. what happened?) or formative (i.e. what does this tell you for the future?). • Projects are evaluated against their project purpose and result indicators. • Evaluation can look at the impact caused by the project (which may sometimes be unintentional). • Evaluation can look at processes, including human dynamics and empowerment.

More Related