1 / 11

Aeroflex RadHard FPGA ESD Test Results January 2005

Aeroflex RadHard FPGA ESD Test Results January 2005. Gerald Matia Manager, Analytical Services Aeroflex Colorado Springs (719) 594-8137 Matia at aeroflex dot com. Outline. ESD Testing Results / Classification Failure Analysis Conclusion. ESD Testing. Test Methods

fran
Télécharger la présentation

Aeroflex RadHard FPGA ESD Test Results January 2005

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Aeroflex RadHard FPGA ESD Test Results January 2005 Gerald Matia Manager, Analytical Services Aeroflex Colorado Springs (719) 594-8137 Matia at aeroflex dot com

  2. Outline • ESD Testing • Results / Classification • Failure Analysis • Conclusion

  3. ESD Testing • Test Methods • HBM: Mil-Std-883, TM3015 • CDM: JESD22-C101C • MM: JESD22-A115-A • Unprogrammed and Programmed devices tested • ViaLinks (antifuses) are isolated from the ESD protection structures by several stages of circuitry • At Failing Voltages, in all cases damage resulted in I/O pin or VCCIO power shorts to ground • No damage observed in adjacent passing buffers

  4. ESD Testing

  5. ESD Stress Results • Specification • HBM: Class 1 = 0-1,999V, Class 2 = 2,000 – 3,999V, Class 3 = 4000+ V • CDM: Class 1 = <200V, Class 2 = 200 to <500V, Class 3 = 500-1000V, Class 4 = >1000V • MM: Class A = 200V or less, Class B 200V - 400V, Class C = 400+ V • Buffer Configurations Tested • LVCMOS • LVTTL • PCI

  6. Ground DP18 Passed DP15 failed Not tested Not tested

  7. Conclusion • ESD Tolerance Results are good • ESD Protection circuitry layout performs well • No change in pre-stress to post-stress electrical test results indicating no damage to device below failing voltage levels

More Related