1 / 18

Cooperative Learning in Science

This workshop provides in-service teachers with strategies and tools to implement cooperative learning in science classrooms. Explore the benefits, research, and practical tips for setting up and assessing cooperative learning groups.

Télécharger la présentation

Cooperative Learning in Science

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Cooperative Learning in Science A Workshop for In-Service Teachers Erin E. Peters

  2. What is cooperative learning? • Cooperative learning is the instructional use of small groups so that students work together to maximize their own and each other’s learning. (Johnson & Johnson, 1999) • Students work together in teams to master material initially presented by the teacher (Slavin, 1995) • Set of instructional strategies which include cooperative student-student interaction over subject matter as an integral part of the learning process (Kagan, 1994)

  3. In the time of change, learners inherent the earth, while the learned find themselves beautifully equipped to deal with a world that no longer exists. - Eric Hoffer

  4. What is your stance? • Exercise 1 – Do you Agree or Disagree? • Exercise 2 – Cooperative, Competitive, or Individualistic?

  5. How do I know it works? • Research in academic achievement • In 99 experimental research studies, 64% significantly favored cooperative learning • Only 5% of these studies significantly favored the control group • Amount of growth depends on type of method among other things • Research in relationships, self-esteem, behavior, and empathy

  6. How do I know it works? • Research has shown that about 2/3 of the time, favorable outcomes will be produced in one or more of the following non-academic categories • Intergroup relations • Acceptance of mainstreamed students • Self-esteem • Proacademic peer norms • Self-attribution • Time-on-task • Liking school • Feeling liked and liking classmates • Cooperation, altruism and empathy

  7. How do I plan for cooperative learning? • Factors to consider • Enhancement of learning goals • Setting up groups • Cooperative learning structure • Interdependence • Assessments

  8. Enhancements of learning goals • The conditions that cooperative efforts may be expected to be more productive than competitive and individualistic efforts: • Clearly perceived positive interdependence • Considerable face-to-face interaction • Clearly perceived individual accountability and personal responsibility to achieve the group’s goals • Frequent use of the relevant interpersonal and small-group skills • Frequent and regular group processing of current functioning to improve the group’s future effectiveness • (Johnson & Johnson, 1999)

  9. Setting up groups • 4 most common team assignments • Heterogeneous • Random • Interest • Homogeneous language

  10. Structures • Teambuilding – team relationship • Classbuilding – whole class relationships • Mastery – content skills • Thinking Skills – cognition • Communication Skills – expressing information • Information Sharing – dissemination • (Kagan, 1994)

  11. Lesson Designs • Mastery Designs • Division of Labor Designs • Project Designs • Multi-Functional Frameworks • Effective Instruction • Johnson & Johnson • Big Four • (Kagan, 1994)

  12. Interdependence • Each group member's efforts are required and indispensable for group success (i.e., there can be no "free-riders"). • Each group member has a unique contribution to make to the joint effort because of his or her resources and/or role and task responsibilities. • (Johnson & Johnson, 1999)

  13. Assessments • Learning Contracts • Tests and Exams • Compositions and Presentations • Portfolios • Observations • Interviewing

  14. Jigsaw Activity • Group – Home groups, mastery groups • Structure – Mastery, Information Sharing • Content – Motors, Transformers, Generators • Interdependence – Non-experts must rely on teaching of experts • Assessment – Individual quizzes on mastery of content

  15. Classbuilding Activity • Group – Whole Group • Structure – Classbuilding • Content – Review of forces content • Interdependence – All students must provide at least one correct answer for the activity to be completed • Assessment – Exam on forces on the following day

  16. Parting Messages Activity • Group – Home groups • Structure – Teambuilding • Content – Social interactions • Interdependence – All students must provide one comment • Assessment – Evaluation of positive feedback

  17. Parting Messages • Team building activity

  18. “Let us put our minds together . . . and see what life we can make for our children” -Sitting Bull

More Related