1 / 24

Housing Solutions for Child Welfare

Housing Solutions for Child Welfare. National Center for Housing and Child Welfare Ruth Anne White, Executive Director. North Carolina Drug Treatment Court Conference.

frisco
Télécharger la présentation

Housing Solutions for Child Welfare

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Housing Solutions for Child Welfare National Center for Housing and Child Welfare Ruth Anne White, Executive Director North Carolina Drug Treatment Court Conference

  2. On the official reports filed when a child is placed in foster care, you won't often find "homeless" as the primary reason for the placement. But you probably should. "What is actually a housing issue is disguised as another issue," says Steve Hayes, director of family and children services for Guilford County. "For example, a woman with children fleeing a domestic violence situation has a housing issue." Or a single parent who lost her job because of substance abuse and is now in treatment, but having trouble making the rent - that's a housing issue, too. From WFAE Julie Rose 8/9/10

  3. The National Center for Housing and Child Welfare (NCHCW) • NCHCW links housing resources to child welfare agencies to improve family functioning, prevent family homelessness, safely reduce the need for out-of-home placement, and ensure that each young person who ages out foster care is able to access safe, decent, permanent housing.

  4. The NCHCW Approach • NCHCW makes the housing-child welfare connection on three key levels: • Policy: Housing and child welfare policies must reflect the real needs of families. For example, NCHCW revived $20 million in funding for FUP so that child welfare can appropriately match housing needs with services. • Program: Communication between systems is key. Bringing system chiefs together can result in resources for cw families and youth. For example, HACLV set aside 50 vouchers for youth. • Practice: All workers must know about resources and where to get them. NCHCW cross-trains front line workers and improves relationships.

  5. Housing Matters • Housing affects families at each decision point in the child welfare continuum. Children from families with housing problems are: • More likely to be investigated by CPS (Culhane et al, 2004) • More likely to be placed in out-of-home care (Courtney et al, 2004) • Longer stayers in foster care (Jones, 1998) • Thirty percent of children in foster care are there because of housing problems (Doerre & Mihaly, 1996; Hagedorn, 1995; Thoma, 1998). • Housing poses a special challenge for which cw workers are uniquely ill-equipped (English, 2005).

  6. Housing is Cost-Effective • A $20 million investment in FUP means that more than 9,000 children can return home. This will result in a savings of $134 million in foster care expenditures. (Harburger and White, 2004). • It costs approximately $53,500 to serve a homeless young person on the street or in residential treatment but supportive housing for one young person costs only $5,300. (Van Leeuwen, 2004). • "If we can invest resources that we now spend to have kids in foster care to help stabilize their families so that they can take care of their own kids, that would be better for the kids, better for the families, and better for the child-welfare system," Donald says. "The system's past failures are not due to lack of resources. They really are not. And that definitely includes Baltimore City." Instead, she says resources have been poorly allocated. It is cheaper to provide services for families than to house kids in group homes, which can cost the system $72,000 a year per child. (MD DHR Secretary Brenda Donald, June 10, 2009, Baltimore City Paper)

  7. ASFA and Housing • Without housing resources, states will continue to fall short of the ASFA goals of safety, permanency, and well-being. • In a 2001 review of family preservation and family support programs, Chaffin, Bonner, and Hill found that programs designed to meet basic needs were more effective at preventing recurrence of maltreatment than programs which offered parenting and child development-oriented services. • Eamon and Koppel (2004) found that “Norman” families (those families assisted with housing subsidies) had reduced rates of out-of- home placement, fewer days in substitute care, and a greater rate of reunification resulting in significant cost savings to the department.

  8. How can CW begin to address housing? • Acknowledge the difficulty that the lack of housing tools poses to frontline cw staff. • Consider the advantage that cw workers have over homeless shelter workers in preventing family and youth homelessness. • Train cw workers on housing issues and resources. • Partner with housers to provide housing tools to cw workers. • Participate in conversations governing the distribution of community housing resources.

  9. Housing Resources • ARRA Homelessness Prevention and Rapid Re-Housing Program (HPRP) • Community Action Programs (received $1 billion in CSBG ARRA funds) • HOME • Low Income Housing Tax Credit • City and State housing funds, SHFAs • Private Landlords • Public Housing Authorities – Section 8 and PH • Family Unification Program

  10. What is the Family Unification Program (FUP)? • FUP is a housing program for families and aging-out youth in the child welfare system. At minimum, FUP provides Section 8 vouchers to child welfare families. • FUP is a local level collaboration between Housing Authorities and Child Welfare Agencies. • FUP is designed to strengthen and stabilize families and assist aging out youth reach independence.

  11. What is the status of FUP? • From 1992 through 2001, HUD awarded an average of 3,500 vouchers to FUP. • In 2000, Sen. Bond added youth ages 18-22 who left foster care after age 16 as an eligible population for FUP. • From 2002-2007, Congress provided funding but HUD opted not to fund FUP . • On July 3, 2009, HUD awarded new 2,551 vouchers to 37 PHAs. • On August 5, 2010, HUD awarded 2500 vouchers – 100 (or 531,000) to Greensboro, NC. • HUD has $15 million to issue a NOFA this fall.

  12. Typical FUP Partnership Signed MOU Department of Children and Families (child welfare) U.S. HUD Info and cooperation Funding for Sec. 8 vouchers Funding and referrals Family Issues voucher to youth Local Public Housing Authority (PHA) Housing assistance and case management Pays rent on time IFP or Supportive Housing CM Landlord Pays rent on time

  13. What are the Benefits of FUP? • For PHAs: increased ability to serve clientele, more Section 8 vouchers, administrative fees. • For CWAs: expanded access to housing solutions for families, caseworkers. • For families: affordable housing, stability, reunification, exit from the child welfare system. • For the community: it is the preferred and most cost-effective alternative to foster care for homeless families. This has been shown to be true with families in recovery as well.

  14. Establishing a FUP • Begin to ask questions regarding the housing needs in your community; consult cw direct service workers. • Map out current housing resources. • Conduct a cost analysis. • Document the need for FUP in your community. • Approach your partner (PHA, CWA) to exchange ideas, observations, and plans.

  15. Establishing a FUP (cont.) • Dedicate Section 8 subsidies to FUP • determine a reasonable number of vouchers to set aside for the program • set a local preference or • apply to HUD for FUP vouchers

  16. Build the Partnership • Gain an understanding of the mission and limitations of your partner agency • Lay out and agree upon the responsibilities of each partner agency • Specify the type and duration of services to be provided to FUP families upon lease-up • Write and sign a detailed Memorandum of Understanding

  17. Elements of an Effective Partnership • Appoint liaisons • Reliable communication • Regular meetings • Patience • Cross training • Staff support • Invite in additional partners • Seek additional funding for services • Solicit feedback from program participants

  18. Frequently Asked Questions • What if a family has a criminal record, history of drug and alcohol abuse, or owes money to the PHA? • Can a family’s voucher be taken away if they fail to comply with FUP? • What records are we supposed to keep? • Why do CWAs close cases so soon after families move in to their permanent housing?

  19. NCHCW Technical Assistance • In addition to presentations to national groups, NCHCW provides direct technical assistance based on the existing level of partnership, resource-sharing, and expressed need of each community. Technical assistance requests generally fall into one of three categories.

  20. NCHCW Policy Agenda • Policy • FUP Press Conference(s) to raise awareness, recognize FUP champions, families, and youth • Convene HHS and HUD to raise Children’s Bureau participation in housing options for child welfare • FCIA implementation • Reintroduction of A Place to Call Home Act • CAPTA reauthorization. • Increase SSFP funding and argue for federal child welfare funding flexibility. • HEARTH Act implementation.

  21. Program Improvements Agenda • Build capacity to provide TA to FUP sites (5 intensive sites). • Formalize and fund the FUP loaned executive network. • Add training materials, video to website. • Increase the amount of communities that enact “FUP Plan B” through outreach and education. • Convene cw folks and housers at regional and national housing solutions meetings – first to be held at Community Access Unlimited in Elizabeth, NJ.

  22. Practice Improvements Agenda • Partner with each of the National Child Welfare Resource Centers to infuse housing interventions into existing and new training materials. • Provide Keeping Families Together and Safe cross-training in FUP sites. • Increase capacity to field housing questions from front line child welfare staff, families and aging-out youth. • Work with HUD PD&R to study the effect interaction of FUP and FSS on family functioning and cw workforce retention .

  23. Exemplary Sites • State of Connecticut • State of Illinois • Vancouver, WA • San Francisco, CA

  24. Contact information • Ruth White, MSSA Executive Director National Center for Housing and Child Welfare 6711 Queens Chapel Rd University Park, MD 20782 (301) 699-0151 rwhite@nchcw.org www.nchcw.org

More Related