1 / 8

JAMA Ophthalmology Journal Club Slides: Mycotic Ulcer Treatment Trial

JAMA Ophthalmology Journal Club Slides: Mycotic Ulcer Treatment Trial.

gad
Télécharger la présentation

JAMA Ophthalmology Journal Club Slides: Mycotic Ulcer Treatment Trial

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. JAMA Ophthalmology Journal Club Slides:Mycotic Ulcer Treatment Trial Prajna NV, Krishnan T, Mascarenhas J, et al; Mycotic Ulcer Treatment Trial Group. The Mycotic Ulcer Treatment Trial: a randomized trial comparing natamycin vs voriconazole. JAMA Ophthalmol. Published online December 10, 2012. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.1497.

  2. Introduction • Infectious keratitis is a leading cause of monocular blindness globally, and fungal keratitis accounts for about 50% of all corneal ulcers. • Fungal keratitis is more difficult to treat than bacterial corneal ulcers and often results in worse outcomes. • Natamycin is the only US Food and Drug Administration–approved antifungal for topical ophthalmic use, but expert opinion and in vitro results indicate that voriconazole may be superior. • Objective: • To compare topical natamycin vs topical voriconazole in the treatment of filamentous fungal keratitis.

  3. Methods • Study Design: Double-masked, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. • Participants: 368 patients with smear-positive filamentous fungal keratitis and visual acuity between 20/40 and 20/400 (inclusive). • Data Analysis: Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) at 3 months analyzed in a multiple linear regression model with baseline BSCVA and treatment arm as covariates. • Limitations: • Enrolled patients only from South India. • No contact lens wearers enrolled. • Compared only topical monotherapies.

  4. Results • Natamycin-treated cases had significantly better 3-month BSCVA than voriconazole-treated cases (P = .006) • Natamycin-treated cases were less likely to have perforation or require therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty (P = .009). • Fusarium cases fared better with natamycin than with voriconazole for 3-month BSCVA (P < .001) and perforation (P = .001). • Non-Fusarium cases fared similarly for 3-month BSCVA (P = .81) and perforation (P = .86).

  5. Results Table title or figure legend with table or figure Abbreviation: BSCVA, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity.

  6. Results Abbreviation: TPK, therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty.

  7. Comment • Why voriconazole? • Recent survey of cornea specialists indicated that while natamycin was the most commonly used antifungal, voriconazole was largely preferred. • Isolates from fungal keratitis demonstrated good in vitro susceptibility to voriconazole. • The Mycotic Ulcer Topical Treatment Trial I (MUTT I) found that natamycin-treated cases had significantly better clinical and microbiological outcomes compared with voriconazole-treated cases. • Much of the difference was attributable to improvements seen in Fusarium cases.

  8. Contact Information • If you have questions, please contact the corresponding author: • Thomas M. Lietman, MD, Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Ave, Box 0412, San Francisco, CA 94143-0412 (tom.lietman@ucsf.edu). Funding/Support • This work was supported by grants U10 EY018573 (Dr Lietman) and K23 EY017897 (Dr Acharya) from the National Eye Institute and grants from That Man May See, the Harper/Inglis Trust, the South Asia Research Foundation, and Research to Prevent Blindness (Drs Lietman and Acharya). Natamycin and voriconazole were donated by Alcon and Pfizer, respectively. Conflict of Interest Disclosures • None reported.

More Related